Po balances on a rocky outcrop, practicing a pose before the setting sun
Film review

Kung Fu Panda

2008 · Directed by Mark Osborne, John Stevenson · 1h 30m · MPA PG

In a sentenceThe panda is good company, but the chopsticks get the finest scene

Po (Jack Black) is the panda at the centre of an animated kung fu adventure built around an underdog’s progress. Shifu (Dustin Hoffman), Tigress (Angelina Jolie) and Tai Lung (Ian McShane) are among the characters in his story, which combines martial-arts combat with physical comedy. Mantis (Seth Rogen), Viper (Lucy Liu) and Crane (David Cross) also feature. The action uses slow motion and freeze frames as the fights unfold, putting a comic panda into the familiar role of an unlikely hero.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Kung Fu Panda is a good-humoured martial-arts comedy whose fights are sharper than its story. Jack Black makes Po worth rooting for, although the supporting characters deserve more than the screenplay gives them.

Mark Osborne and John Stevenson make a sensible choice with Kung Fu Panda: they take the kung fu seriously enough for the comedy to work. This is an enjoyable family adventure, carried by its fights and Jack Black’s appealing voice performance as Po. The story is familiar, and Jonathan Aibel and Glenn Berger’s screenplay does little to disguise how few surprises it has. We would happily spend an evening with this panda, even when the writing leaves him short of anything interesting to say.

Jack Black gives Po enough eagerness to make the underdog story worth following. His silliness is endearing, and the voice performance leaves space for the animation to do much of the comic work. That matters in a film whose central joke could have worn out quickly. He makes Po enjoyable company through stretches where the screenplay is merely getting on with the expected business, and the affection survives some fairly broad comedy.

The chopstick battle between Po and Shifu is the clearest example of what the film gets right. We laughed because the timing makes such small movements feel so important. Dustin Hoffman and Jack Black have a scene that builds its comedy out of the fight itself, without interrupting it to explain the joke. Across the action, C.K. Horness’s editing handles changes of pace deftly, giving us time to appreciate the physical business before moving on.

Yong Duk Jhun’s cinematography makes the movement readable, including when the film pauses it for a freeze frame. Raymond Zibach’s production design gives those fights a colourful, detailed setting that remains worth looking at between the blows. The scenery helps the film feel larger than its elementary story. John Powell and Hans Zimmer’s music keeps the action lively, although its eagerness occasionally feels unnecessary when the movement is already doing the work.

The supporting characters are the main disappointment. Angelina Jolie’s Tigress and Seth Rogen’s Mantis belong to a cast that sounds more promising than the writing proves to be. The screenplay gives us too little reason to become as interested in them as in Po, and famous voices cannot supply what has not been written. Some of the dialogue consequently feels like time spent waiting for another fight, rather than a chance to get to know the company.

As a martial-arts comedy, though, this has a welcome respect for the thing it is borrowing. The fights have enough wit and energy to entertain someone who came for the action, while slow motion and freeze frames help make the movement funny. The filmmakers understand that a comic fight still needs to work as a fight. For a family animation with such a ready-made joke in its title, that degree of care is worth appreciating.

At 90 minutes, it asks for a reasonable amount of patience when the writing becomes predictable. There is enough invention in the action to repay it, though anyone hoping for equally rich work across the whole cast should lower their expectations. Choose it for an evening when a well-timed scrap matters more than being surprised by the story.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

66
Positive
6
Mixed
8
Negative
1

The reviews lean towards qualified approval, with praise concentrated on the animation and martial-arts sequences rather than the story. Most critics find the fights lively and inventive, and even less enthusiastic assessments admire the detailed scenery and colourful imagery. Jack Black’s performance as Po also draws praise for making the familiar underdog appealing. For the warmer reviews, the humour and energetic action make this an enjoyable family adventure despite its predictable plot.

Reservations centre on thin characters, broad comedy and a script that follows familiar formulas. The spread is fairly wide, though mixed assessments outnumber enthusiastic ones. Variety offers the clearest dissent, finding little comic inspiration or character depth to match the sophisticated visuals. The Skinny takes the opposing view, praising the script as well as the animation for making the characters engaging; elsewhere, even several admirers concede that the storytelling is flimsy.

Empire
27 June 2006 · Chris Hewitt
80*

Hewitt considers it DreamWorks Animation’s finest effort since the first Shrek, despite a rudimentary plot and merely decent gags. He especially praises the astonishing visuals and exhilarating kung fu sequences.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
15 May 2009 · festival review · Kirk Honeycutt
80*

Honeycutt finds the film funny, frantic, and broadly appealing. He especially praises its vivid animation and the lively martial-arts action.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
65*

The page is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be verified. No specific praise or complaint is available from the page text.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
16 November 2008 · Mark Kermode
65*

Kermode finds the film affable, slick family entertainment, though its script is baggy and it lacks the staying power of the Shrek series. He praises its unexpectedly plentiful, innocuous laughs.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
15 May 2008 · Allan Hunter
64*

The accessible page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It also does not show what the critic singled out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
5 June 2008 · ★★½/4 · Nick Schager
62

Schager finds the film watchably innocuous but narratively meager and overly reliant on familiar formulas. He praises the lively, well-animated action, especially the chopstick battle between Po and Shifu.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Kung Fu Panda worth watching?
Kung Fu Panda is worth watching for its witty fights and Jack Black’s appealing Po, and we score it 77 out of 100. We recommend it for a family evening when physical comedy matters more than an unpredictable story, though the supporting characters get too little attention.
How long is Kung Fu Panda, and what is it rated?
Kung Fu Panda runs 1h 30m and is rated PG by the MPA in the US. It is an action and animation film.
Where can I watch Kung Fu Panda in the US?
Kung Fu Panda is streaming on Tubi and Amazon Prime Video in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from $3.99. It leaves Tubi on 1 October. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Kung Fu Panda compare to Ernest & Celestine?
Kung Fu Panda is the choice for lively martial-arts comedy, while we recommend Ernest & Celestine for warmer, more individual attention to its animal characters. Po is good company, but his companions are thinly written; the slight, funny story of a mouse and a bear offers more of the character work we miss here.
What should I watch after Kung Fu Panda?
After Kung Fu Panda, try Ernest & Celestine (2012, Fi1m 84): For animal characters given the warmth and individual attention Po’s companions lack. Then The Iron Giant (1999, Fi1m 88): For family animation that gives its unlikely hero more emotional weight; and Chicken Run (2000, Fi1m 84): For an underdog adventure whose supporting characters all earn their place.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2009

Nominated
Best Animated Feature

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Animated Movie, 2009

Nominated
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Animated Movie

Annie Award for Best Animated Feature, 2008

Won
Annie Award for Best Animated Feature

Critics' Choice Awards, 2008

Nominated
Best Animated Feature

If you liked this, try…

  1. Drunken Master (1978) · not reviewed yetFor martial-arts comedy that makes bodily effort part of the joke.

  2. Shaolin Soccer (2001) · not reviewed yetFor another cheerfully unlikely collision of athletic skill and physical comedy.

  3. Ernest & Celestine (2012, Fi1m 84)For animal characters given the warmth and individual attention Po’s companions lack.

  4. The Iron Giant (1999, Fi1m 88)For family animation that gives its unlikely hero more emotional weight.

  5. Chicken Run (2000, Fi1m 84)For an underdog adventure whose supporting characters all earn their place.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever