Princess Lili (Mia Sara) reaches toward a white unicorn standing in a forest stream
Film review

Legend

1985 · Directed by Ridley Scott · 1h 34m

In a sentenceTim Curry seems to have read a livelier fairy tale than everyone else

Jack (Tom Cruise), Princess Lili (Mia Sara) and the Lord of “Darkness” (Tim Curry) are the central characters in Legend, a fantasy adventure. The cast also includes David Bennent as Honeythorn Gump, Alice Playten as Blix, Annabelle Lanyon as Oona and Robert Picardo as Meg Mucklebones. Ridley Scott directs a screenplay by William Hjortsberg, with cinematography by Alex Thomson, editing by Terry Rawlings and production design by Assheton Gorton. The film runs for 94 minutes and has a PG certificate.

Fi1m review

Ridley Scott’s fantasy rewards a taste for elaborate imagery, though its characters struggle to hold our attention. Tim Curry supplies welcome mischief in a film chiefly worth considering for committed fairy-tale enthusiasts.

Ridley Scott’s Legend is a fantasy adventure worth considering for its appearance and Tim Curry, provided a thin story is not a deal-breaker. At 94 minutes, it still has stretches in which there seems little to follow beyond the next elaborate image. The director wants us to accept fairy-tale simplicity without embarrassment, and we are happy to meet him there. The trouble is how seldom William Hjortsberg’s screenplay makes its people interesting enough to justify the attention spent on their surroundings.

Alex Thomson’s cinematography makes the crowded frames readable, drawing our eyes through the detail rather than losing them in it. Assheton Gorton’s production design rewards that scrutiny, although the decorative excess can become tiring. Everything receives so much visual attention that the actors sometimes struggle to hold ours. There is pleasure in looking closely, even if we occasionally find ourselves inspecting the surroundings because the people have become dull.

Tom Cruise, as Jack, and Mia Sara, as Princess Lili, have the harder task of making that world matter to us. Their earnestness is apparent, but William Hjortsberg gives them too little individuality. We felt detached from them because their exchanges seldom suggest two people with much to discover about each other. The film asks for affection before it has given us enough reason to feel it, and the performances cannot quite make up the difference.

Tim Curry has a better time as the Lord of “Darkness”, and so do we. He gives the dialogue a relish missing elsewhere, allowing a line to sound as though someone actually wants to say it. The performance has enough wit to make the surrounding solemnity seem even more burdensome. We found ourselves waiting for him to speak again; his enjoyment of the language briefly makes this stiff fairy tale feel playful.

Terry Rawlings’s editing keeps presenting images worth looking at, but the scenes do not build much urgency between them. The film can feel oddly slow for its length, particularly when its blunt distinctions between good and evil are being pressed upon us again. Simple storytelling is perfectly reasonable in a fantasy. What becomes wearing is the repetition, which leaves little room for characters to surprise us or for a conversation to develop beyond its immediate purpose.

The music is credited to Jerry Goldsmith, Johannes Schmölling, Edgar Froese and Christopher Franke, and it underlines how much of the appeal lies outside the writing. There is more feeling in the musical sweep than in several of the exchanges it supports. Yet the insistence on wonder also becomes wearing, with too many moments demanding the same wide-eyed response. A little more quiet would give the performances room to establish a different pace.

We would not improve Legend by making it explain every strange thing, or by demanding complicated motives from everyone in a fairy tale. The problem is that its people offer so little company between the striking images. Ridley Scott’s care for appearances is easy to appreciate, and Tim Curry makes a persuasive case for staying with it. Try it if elaborate fantasy design is a pleasure in itself; come expecting engaging heroes and the evening may feel longer than 94 minutes.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

49
Positive
2
Mixed
1
Negative
5

Most critics find Legend more persuasive as a visual fantasy than as a story, with praise clustering around its imagery, design and costumes. Even the less favourable reviews acknowledge the appeal of its fairy-tale setting, while Tim Curry’s Lord of Darkness receives particular praise for bringing some life to the proceedings. Tangerine Dream’s score also earns approval, though these strengths seldom outweigh complaints about thin characters and a lack of emotional involvement.

The disagreement centres on how much those visual pleasures can compensate for the storytelling. Slant Magazine offers the clearest defence, celebrating the film’s transportive style while acknowledging that character development suffers. The less enthusiastic reviews find the imagery insufficient, with reservations ranging from blunt symbolism and kitsch to a shortage of wit and invention. Across the relevant reviews, admiration for the craft is considerably more widespread than enthusiasm for the film.

Slant Magazine
13 October 2021 · ★★★★ · Rocco T. Thompson
80

Thompson praises the Arrow Video edition as a stellar release that gives fans little reason to want more. He highlights the film’s transportive visual style and Tangerine Dream score, while noting the trade-off of style over character development.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
13 September 2015 · Mark Kermode
70*

Kermode finds the film cartoonish but undeniably entertaining, with its attitude to the Krays’ glamour left deliberately ambiguous. He praises Tom Hardy’s committed, mesmerising dual performance as the twins.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TCh
64*

The available metadata does not reveal the critic’s verdict. Its description singles out the Teutonic-myth framing and the Lord of Darkness’s unicorn-killing.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★ · Joanna Berry
40

Berry finds the film a daft fairy tale that director Ridley Scott might prefer to forget. She singles out Tim Curry’s performance as the Lord of Darkness as the film’s best feature.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
18 April 1986 · Kevin Thomas
35*

Thomas finds the film visually sumptuous but thin in substance and unlikely to hold most adults’ interest. He praises Tim Curry’s lively performance and Tangerine Dream’s score, while wishing the film had more wit and invention.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
11 June 2002 · Keith Phipps
30*

Phipps finds the film a visually appealing but intriguing failure, undone by its excess and lack of human depth. He singles out the striking imagery as a strength, while criticizing the story’s blunt symbolism and kitsch.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Legend worth watching?
Legend is worth considering for committed fairy-tale enthusiasts who enjoy elaborate imagery and Tim Curry’s mischief; we score it 61 out of 100. We find its richly detailed surroundings more engaging than its heroes, and the thin, repetitive story makes even 94 minutes feel slow.
How long is Legend, and what is it rated?
Legend runs 1h 34m. It is an adventure and fantasy film.
Where can I watch Legend in Belgium?
Legend is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from €3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Legend compare to The Dark Crystal?
Legend offers elaborate fantasy imagery and Tim Curry’s wit, but we recommend The Dark Crystal more readily for the personalities of its handmade creatures. Both adventures sometimes struggle to hold our attention, though The Dark Crystal gives us more reason to care about the figures inhabiting its richly imagined surroundings.
What should I watch after Legend?
After Legend, try The Dark Crystal (1982, Fi1m 78): For another elaborate fantasy where the creatures deserve the attention they receive. Then Princess Mononoke (1997, Fi1m 88): For a forest fantasy whose characters complicate every easy judgement.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1987

Nominated
Best Makeup and Hairstyling

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Dark Crystal (1982, Fi1m 78)For another elaborate fantasy where the creatures deserve the attention they receive.

  2. La Belle et la Bête (1946) · not reviewed yetFor fairy-tale imagery with a more persuasive sense of desire.

  3. The Company of Wolves (1984) · not reviewed yetFor anyone who wants their fairy tales stranger and considerably less reassuring.

  4. Princess Mononoke (1997, Fi1m 88)For a forest fantasy whose characters complicate every easy judgement.

  5. Tale of Tales (2015) · not reviewed yetFor extravagant fairy tales with sharper appetites and less obedient princesses.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever