Film review

Mary Poppins

1964 · Directed by Robert Stevenson · 2h 19m · MPA G

In a sentenceThe strictest nanny in cinema arrives by umbrella, and within a week the whole of London is dancing on its chimneys

ComedyFamilyFantasy

Edwardian London, Cherry Tree Lane. Mr Banks (David Tomlinson) works at a bank and runs his household by the clock, while Mrs Banks (Glynis Johns) marches for the vote and Admiral Boom (Reginald Owen) fires a cannon on the hour. Their children Jane (Karen Dotrice) and Michael (Matthew Garber) have seen off their nanny, Katie Nanna (Elsa Lanchester). Their father advertises for a stern replacement and tears up the children’s advert asking for a kind one; next morning Mary Poppins (Julie Andrews) is blown in on the east wind holding an umbrella and hires herself. She tidies the nursery with a snap of her fingers, then with Bert (Dick Van Dyke), a pavement artist, takes the children into one of his chalk drawings, where the penguins wait tables.

Fi1m review

Robert Stevenson’s musical runs long and Dick Van Dyke’s Cockney has never recovered, but Julie Andrews, the Sherman brothers’ songs and David Tomlinson’s frightened banker make it Disney’s best live-action film. It is a children’s film that is quietly about a father.

Disney’s film of P.L. Travers’s books is a good deal softer than she was. It is a musical about a strict nanny made by a studio that could never bear to be strict for long. It is too long and its Cockney accents are a national joke. We recommend it all the same, and not only for children. It is the best live-action film Disney ever made, and it has more sadness in it than most people remember.

The setting is Cherry Tree Lane in Edwardian London. Mr Banks (David Tomlinson) works at a bank and wants his home run like one. Mrs Banks (Glynis Johns) is out marching for the vote. Jane (Karen Dotrice) and Michael (Matthew Garber) have driven off another nanny, and when their father advertises for a stern replacement a woman called Mary Poppins (Julie Andrews) comes down out of the sky on the end of an umbrella and takes the job before he has quite offered it. Bert (Dick Van Dyke), a pavement artist and sometime chimney sweep, knows her from somewhere, and the film never says where.

Andrews is the reason it holds. Her Mary is vain, brisk and faintly amused by everything; she never explains herself and never says thank you. She sings A Spoonful of Sugar to a nursery that tidies itself at the snap of her fingers, and the trick of the performance is that she does not look pleased about it. The film’s one idea is that kindness can be delivered without a smile. She sings Feed the Birds at a bedroom window with Edward Colman’s light coming in low and the children half asleep. We were not ready for it. It moved us more than any of the dancing, because for two minutes nobody is trying to be delightful.

Richard M. Sherman and Robert B. Sherman wrote a score of tunes people who have never seen the film can hum: Chim Chim Cher-ee, Jolly Holiday, Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious, Let’s Go Fly a Kite. Van Dyke’s accent wanders from Bow to the American Midwest and back within a line, and it has been laughed at for good reason. It is the least of what he does. He dances with four cartoon penguins and keeps up, he plays the ancient chairman of Mr Banks’s bank under a great deal of make-up, and he is the only person on screen who enjoys Mary’s company as much as we do.

Colman’s London is chimneys and soot under a painted sky, with a St Paul’s built far too large on the horizon; one early critic took that as a fault and we take it as the point. When Mary, Bert and the children jump into a chalk drawing, the actors stroll through a painted countryside among drawn farm animals, and the seams show. We did not mind. What the film cannot hide is its length. At 139 minutes there is a stretch past the hour where Robert Stevenson lines up set pieces and loses the story, and Cotton Warburton lets the rooftop number Step in Time run on past its point. Fifteen minutes could go.

The story actually being told belongs to Mr Banks. Tomlinson plays him as a man who is not cruel, only frightened, and who has confused a tidy house and a steady job with looking after his children. Don DaGradi and Bill Walsh’s script gives him the turn in the second half, which we will not describe, and it lands harder than a film with dancing penguins has any right to. Johns has less luck. Her suffragette song is one of the best jokes in the picture, and the script forgets her afterwards.

Stevenson made Bedknobs and Broomsticks seven years later with Tomlinson and the same mixture, and it shows what this one would have been without Andrews: pleasant, and gone by breakfast. Most critics land near where we do. The dissenters call the film too polished and too soft. The polish we grant. The softness we grant less readily: the film lets a grown man be wrong for two hours before it corrects him, and not many children’s films risk that.

Watch it with a child if you can borrow one. If you cannot, watch the father.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

76
Positive
11
Mixed
1
Negative
2

Most critics are won over, and have been since 1964. Eleven of fourteen reviews are positive, and the praise gathers in the same places: Julie Andrews, whose nanny is repeatedly described as exact and a little unknowable; the Sherman brothers’ songs; and the sequences that put live actors among cartoon penguins. The chimney-sweep dance and Poppins’s arrival are named as set pieces that still work, and later writers, returning for anniversaries, find it has held up.

The reservations are scattered. Dick Van Dyke’s Cockney accent is the commonest complaint, raised by Time Out and The Times. Empire finds it overlong and would cut it. The sharper dissent is contemporary: The New Yorker thinks the whole thing too polished and too expensive to feel true, an oversized St Paul’s standing for the problem, while The Times finds it softened from the books and heavy of touch. Slant, reading it as a muddled tract on matriarchy, is the outlier. The spread runs from thirty to a hundred, which is wide for a film this well liked.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · David Parkinson
100

This is easily the best of Disney's experiments in combining animation and live action, and one of the studio's best-loved films. Julie Andrews is splendid as the prim nanny, with unforgettable sequences, adorable cartoon characters and timeless songs.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
27 August 2024
90*

The critic hails the film as a dazzling, enduring Disney masterpiece and technical marvel that has not lost its shine on its 60th anniversary. They single out Julie Andrews' pitch-perfect, enigmatic performance as the vital X-factor that elevates the musical and keeps the character intriguingly complex.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
28 August 1964 · James Powers
90*

The critic calls the film irresistible and a triumph of cohesive intelligence, praising Robert Stevenson’s direction as making it the greatest musical of its kind since The Wizard of Oz.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
25 September 1964 · Bosley Crowther
85*

The critic finds the Disney adaptation a wonderful, cheering movie that adds visual and aural felicities including beautiful production values, animated sequences, nimble dancing, and a strong musical score. He singles out Julie Andrews’ performance as Mary Poppins for particular praise while noting strong support from the rest of the cast and inventive direction.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1963 · Variety Staff
85*

The critic praises Disney’s all-out dream-world rendition of the magical nanny story and its introduction of wonders to the children. He singles out standout songs like “Chim-Chim-Cher-ee,” the chimney-sweep ballet, the live-action/animation penguin sequence, and the triumphant screen debuts of Julie Andrews and Dick Van Dyke.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
16 August 1964 · Philip K. Scheuer
80*

The critic calls it a Disney fantasy film that brings amazement and delight even to grownups and squares. He highlights the film’s successful blend of fantasy elements that appeal across age groups.

Read the full review →

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1965

Nominated
Best Art Direction, Color
Nominated
Best Cinematography, Color
Nominated
Best Costume Design, Color
Nominated
Best Director
Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Score, Adaptation or Treatment
Nominated
Best Sound
Nominated
Best Writing, Adapted Screenplay
Won
Best Actress
Won
Best Film Editing
Won
Best Original Score
Won
Best Original Song
Won
Best Visual Effects

If you liked this, try…

Bedknobs and Broomsticks poster

Bedknobs and Broomsticks

1971 · Stevenson and Tomlinson try the trick again, with less magic and more Nazis

Chitty Chitty Bang Bang poster

Chitty Chitty Bang Bang

1968 · The Sherman brothers and Van Dyke again, with a flying car and a nastier villain

Meet Me in St. Louis poster

Meet Me in St. Louis

1944 · Another household musical where the father is the problem and the songs do the healing

My Neighbour Totoro poster89

My Neighbour Totoro

1988 · Two sisters, an absent parent and a large creature who never explains itself

Paddington 2 poster91

Paddington 2

2017 · A polite stranger sorts out a London family, and the city looks like a picture book