Dr. Michael Morbius (Jared Leto) looking down in swirling blue smoke
Film review

Morbius

2022 · Directed by Daniel Espinosa · 1h 45m

In a sentenceA vampire film so solemn that Matt Smith having fun feels like a breach of contract

Dr. Michael Morbius (Jared Leto) looks to science for an answer to the suffering he shares with his friend Milo (Matt Smith). His work draws him into vampirism, making the consequences of his experiments personal for both men. Martine Bancroft (Adria Arjona) and Dr. Emil Nicholas (Jared Harris) are part of the circle around him. As he tries to understand his changed condition, the scientific problem becomes a threat he cannot simply reason away. His friendship with Milo remains bound up with the predicament he is trying to escape.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Daniel Espinosa’s vampire thriller wastes a promising friendship on thin writing and muddled action. Jared Leto takes it seriously, Matt Smith finds some fun, and neither can make it worth the evening.

Daniel Espinosa’s Morbius starts with a workable idea: two friends whose shared suffering might make a vampire story matter. That gives this particular scientist a reason to interest us before any transformation, and gives the horror somewhere personal to begin. The film is poor because it spends so little time developing that friendship and so much on action that becomes difficult to follow. The 105 minutes feel longer once the fights begin to repeat themselves.

Jared Leto plays Dr. Michael Morbius with a seriousness that initially helps: a mad scientist is more interesting when he believes there is a sound reason for what he is doing. The friendship with Milo, played by Matt Smith, offers a way of understanding that determination without another explanation from the screenplay. Both actors give the shared suffering some weight. What is missing is enough writing to make us interested in these men beyond the problem that connects them.

The screenplay by Burk Sharpless and Matt Sazama favours exposition, then hurries through the backstory that might have made the exposition unnecessary. We learn enough to follow the premise, but the supporting characters are too thin to make each new difficulty count. Adria Arjona gives Martine Bancroft a welcome presence, though the part has too little scope to change the film’s direction. It is frustrating to see capable actors supplying concern that the script has not taken the trouble to build.

Oliver Wood’s cinematography is more persuasive in the gloom, where the nocturnal setting briefly gives the film the unease it needs. When light breaks through, we can look at the image without spending so much effort trying to distinguish what is in it. Stefania Cella’s production design contributes to that atmosphere, although the surroundings make less impression than the performers. There is enough visual care here to suggest a modest horror film could have worked if the story had stayed with its people.

Pietro Scalia’s editing is least helpful when the action takes over, cutting so choppily that movement stops being something we can follow. The digital transformations do Jared Leto no favours either, obscuring a committed performance with effects that struggle to convince. We were bored by the fights because the cutting kept making it harder to care who was doing what. Jon Ekstrand’s score cannot restore the suspense lost in those passages. More of the performers and a clearer view of their movements would have done more to help.

Matt Smith is the useful exception to the prevailing solemnity. He supplies some of the pleasure in excess that a vampire film can reasonably promise, and the change in energy is welcome. We do not need this kind of horror to be respectable, but we do need it to take some pleasure in frightening or surprising us. Here the familiar vampire material is treated with such dutiful seriousness that even its silliness seldom becomes fun. Unless following this particular scientist matters to you, we would spend the evening elsewhere.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

36
Positive
2
Mixed
3
Negative
18

Most critics find Morbius a dull, derivative vampire origin story, with thin characters and action that offers little excitement. The limited praise clusters around the performances: several reviews credit Jared Leto’s commitment, while Matt Smith supplies energy that they find lacking elsewhere. Some also see promise in the mad-scientist premise and find moments of atmosphere or visual interest, though few consider these enough to compensate for the script.

The reservations centre on predictable plotting, confusing effects and poorly staged or repetitive combat. Performances divide opinion too, with Leto judged committed by some and lifeless by others. The spread is wide despite the strongly negative consensus: Vulture finds a brisk, atmospheric thriller with effective scares and heartfelt acting, while Screen Daily enjoys the spirited cast and assured direction. These favourable reviews find modest genre pleasures where most critics see an underdeveloped franchise exercise.

Vulture
1 April 2022 · Bilge Ebiri
75*

Despite seeming unnecessary, the film works as a tight, brisk mad-scientist thriller with strong atmosphere, effective scares, and heartfelt performances from Leto and Matt Smith. Espinosa brings an engaging dreamy style to its nocturnal world.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
31 March 2022
70*

The critic finds it a consistently enjoyable franchise start-up elevated by spirited performances and the director’s sure hand, offering modest genre pleasures and a spooky vibe.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
31 March 2022 · Manohla Dargis
65*

The critic finds that Morbius does not suck as a movie and provides a diverting neo-vampiric tale despite the odds. The first half is better shaped, with coherent characters and visuals that sometimes allow light to shine through the gloom.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
30 March 2022 · C- · Todd Gilchrist
50

A run-of-the-mill, capably acted origin story that is professionally mounted but mostly lifeless and disappointing after years of anticipation. It leans on familiar vampire clichés and horror visuals without delivering excitement or depth.

Read the full review →
Empire
31 March 2022 · ★★ · Sophie Butcher
40

The core concept of two friends bonded by suffering has promise but is undermined by messy action, wafer-thin characters and a slight plot. Solid performances and flashes of visual interest cannot save the flat, forgettable result.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
31 March 2022 · ★★ · Sabastian Astley
40

The critic finds the film disappointing overall, with a dated plot, visually confusing CGI and predictable storytelling that reaches new depths.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Morbius worth watching?
Morbius is not worth the evening for most viewers, and we scored it 38. Jared Leto takes the scientist seriously and Matt Smith finds some fun as Milo, but the screenplay leaves their friendship thin and the fights are cut so choppily that we stopped caring who was doing what. Only those set on following this particular character need bother.
How long is Morbius, and what is it rated?
Morbius runs 1h 45m. It is an action and science fiction film.
Where can I watch Morbius in Portugal?
Morbius is streaming on HBO Max in Portugal, and it is also available to rent from Apple TV and Amazon Prime Video from €3.99. It leaves HBO Max on 15 October. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Morbius, and is it suitable for children?
Morbius carries a UK 15 certificate, so it is not suitable for younger children. The review finds the vampire material handled with dutiful seriousness rather than real fright, and the digital transformations struggle to convince, so the squeamish have less to fear than the certificate suggests. Older teenagers are the natural audience, though we doubt they will be scared.
How does Morbius compare to The Fly?
Morbius and The Fly both follow a scientist whose experiment changes his body, and Cronenberg's film is the far better one. The Fly makes its horror hurt by giving us a couple worth caring about, while Morbius skims past the friendship that might have done the same. Choose The Fly unless you cannot stomach graphic effects.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Fly (1986, Fi1m 88)Another scientist’s experiment goes wrong, with far more care for the person changing.

  2. Cronos (1993) · not reviewed yetVampirism treated as a bodily burden, with tenderness towards the man enduring it.

  3. Thirst (2009) · not reviewed yetAn appetite for blood creates moral trouble, and the characters remain worth following.

  4. Byzantium (2012) · not reviewed yetTwo female vampires get the history and complicated loyalties missing from this story.

  5. Frankenstein (1931) · not reviewed yetA scientist’s ambition produces horror through actors and atmosphere rather than confused action.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever