Jesse Lee (Mario Van Peebles) rides a horse through a dusty town, raising one hand
Film review

Posse

1993 · Directed by Mario Van Peebles · 1h 51m

In a sentenceA history lesson with a fish-eye lens and a body count

Cuba, 1898. Jesse Lee (Mario Van Peebles) leads a unit of Black infantrymen through the Spanish-American War under Colonel Graham (Billy Zane), a white officer who sends them behind enemy lines to take a shipment of gold and does not expect them back. They come back, with the gold. Jesse, the giant Obobo (Tommy Lister Jr.), Father Time (Big Daddy Kane), Weezie (Charles Lane) and a white soldier who throws in with them, Little J (Stephen Baldwin), escape. Jesse has a destination in mind: Freemanville, the Black settlement his preacher father founded, where Phoebe (Pam Grier) still lives and where the men who were there the night his father died have never been asked about it. Graham follows.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Mario Van Peebles puts Black cowboys back into the Western and tells us, often, that he is doing it. The result is lively, well cast and too restless to land a punch; the quiet final minute does more than the preceding 110.

Two years after New Jack City, Mario Van Peebles directs and stars in a Western built to correct the record. The genre spent half a century pretending the frontier was white, the film says, and it is right. Good intentions are not nothing, and we went in wanting to like it. What he has made is a loud, crowded, hit-and-miss 111 minutes that keeps its history in the end titles and its energy everywhere else.

The opening is the best stretch. Cuba in 1898, a trench full of Black soldiers under a white colonel who plainly regards them as spare, a night raid for gold that turns into a betrayal and an escape. Peter Menzies shoots it in orange smoke and hard sidelight, with the camera low and tilted, and the confusion is the point. Billy Zane plays Colonel Graham with a white glove and a smirk and has a wonderful time doing it. For twenty minutes the film has one job, get these men out alive and rich, and it does the job.

The cast is the reason to stay. Big Daddy Kane, as Father Time, is loose and funny and never seems to be acting. Tommy Lister Jr.’s Obobo is a big man the film treats as gentle, which is rarer than it should be. Charles Lane’s Weezie gets the laughs and earns most of them. Stephen Baldwin plays Little J as the eager younger brother the others tolerate. Pam Grier, Isaac Hayes and Salli Richardson are all in it and all underused; Grier in particular gets a few scenes and a look that suggests she could have carried the picture.

Van Peebles himself is the problem in the middle of his own film. He plays Jesse Lee as a pose: duster, hat brim, cheroot, eyes in close-up. The Leone borrowings are so direct they stop being homage and become a checklist, and he does not have Eastwood’s trick of looking as though the stillness costs him something. When Jesse talks about his father we are told he is in pain. We never saw it.

The direction will not sit still. Menzies is asked for fish-eye close-ups, whip pans, slow-motion blood and a camera that spins around speakers for no reason the scene supplies. Mark Conte and Seth Flaum cut a two-line exchange into eight shots. Michel Colombier’s score reaches for Morricone, brass and guitar and a big held chord under every entrance, and gets about halfway there. Catherine Hardwicke builds Freemanville as a plain wooden town with a church at its heart, and it is the one place in the film the camera calms down enough to let us look at.

The script, by Dario Scardapane and Sy Richardson, has too much in it. There is the pursuit, the gold, a railroad scheme, a romance for Little J, a second romance for Jesse, flashbacks that keep returning to the same night, and a frame in which an old man tells the whole thing to two reporters. Each of these would fill a Western on its own. Together they mean nothing gets more than a scene and a half, and the revenge the film is heading toward arrives as one more item on the list.

And yet. The frame ends with photographs of real Black cowboys and a few lines of text about how many of them there were, and we found ourselves moved, properly, in a way nothing staged in the previous hour and three-quarters had managed. The feeling was partly for the faces and partly for the film, which had the right subject the whole time and kept running away from it to shoot something in slow motion. John Ford got there first with Sergeant Rutledge in 1960, and did it with a single trial and a single man.

See it for the faces in the cast and the faces at the end. The hour in between is a Western made by someone who loves Westerns and does not yet trust one to stand still.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

59
Positive
2
Mixed
3
Negative
2
Los Angeles Times
14 May 1993 · MICHAEL WILMINGTON
88*

Wilmington finds the film a rousing, exuberant entertainment whose excesses are part of its appeal. He praises its revisionist effort to spotlight Black people largely overlooked in Hollywood Westerns.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
80*

The critic presents the film as a vigorous, incisive Western. They praise Tone Loc’s co-star Lane’s puckish comic performance for bringing levity to the bloody action.

Read the full review →
Variety
28 April 1993 · Todd McCarthy
65*

McCarthy finds the film lively and appealing, though its crowded plotting and weak dramatic build keep it from reaching emotional depth. He praises its revisionist portrayal of Black cowboys and the cast’s infectious energy.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The review's verdict cannot be established from the accessible page. Its specific praise or criticism is likewise unavailable.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
14 May 1993 · Janet Maslin
50*

The review gives the film a mixed verdict. It singles out its revisionist Western approach, while finding the execution uneven.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · empire
35*

The review finds the film entertaining but ultimately thin, with more style than substance. It faults the revisionist Western for repeating genre conventions rather than meaningfully subverting them.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Posse worth watching?
Posse is worth watching mainly for its cast and for the photographs of real Black cowboys that close it, and we scored it 58. Mario Van Peebles has the right subject, a Western that puts Black soldiers back on the frontier, but his direction will not sit still and the script crams in too much. Big Daddy Kane, Charles Lane and an underused Pam Grier are the reasons to stay.
How long is Posse, and what is it rated?
Posse runs 1h 51m. It is an action and adventure film.
Where can I watch Posse in Singapore?
Posse is available to rent from Apple TV from S$4.98. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Posse, and is it suitable for children?
Posse carries a UK 15 certificate and is a violent Western, with a night raid for gold, a pursuit and a revenge plot that arrives in slow-motion blood. It is not frightening so much as loud and crowded, but the body count and the war-time betrayal make it unsuitable for children. Teenagers who can take a conventional action Western should be fine.
How does Posse compare to The Wild Bunch?
Posse borrows its slow-motion bloodshed from The Wild Bunch, and the earlier film is the better of the two by a distance. Sam Peckinpah's Western gives its outlaw loyalties real weight and its violence a cost; Van Peebles uses the same tricks as a checklist, and little lands. Watch The Wild Bunch for the force, Posse for the subject and the faces.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Buck and the Preacher (1972) · not reviewed yetPoitier directs and stars; the Black Western Posse wishes it were, calmer and angrier.

  2. Sergeant Rutledge (1960) · not reviewed yetFord puts a Black cavalryman on trial and lets Woody Strode carry it.

  3. The Harder They Fall (2021) · not reviewed yetSame correction, thirty years on, with real cowboys’ names and far better gunfights.

  4. New Jack City (1991) · not reviewed yetVan Peebles’s first film; the same restless camera, pointed at something it understands.

  5. The Wild Bunch (1969, Fi1m 84)Where the slow-motion blood comes from, and why it meant something once.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever