A suited man walks through a doorway as a woman lies in the foreground
Film review

Sabotage

1936 · Directed by Alfred Hitchcock · 1h 17m

In a sentenceAlfred Hitchcock makes a trip to the aquarium feel like something the police should know about

In London, Mrs. Verloc (Sylvia Sidney) is married to Karl Verloc (Oskar Homolka), and Stevie (Desmond Tester) is her young brother. A bomb plot brings the threat of violence close to their family. Ted (John Loder) and Superintendent Talbot (Matthew Boulton) also figure in the unfolding crime, while an aquarium becomes the setting for a sinister encounter. The people involved do not all have the same understanding of the danger, leaving family loyalties exposed to plans made beyond the home.

Fi1m review

Alfred Hitchcock’s Sabotage is a gripping thriller with an unusually cruel streak. Its family relationships give the suspense weight, though obscure plotting and ill-timed comedy keep interrupting the fear.

Alfred Hitchcock’s Sabotage is a good, disquieting thriller, though its comic interruptions and cloudy plotting keep it from being a wholly satisfying one. The bomb plot supplies the danger, but the family caught close to it gives that danger a weight the mechanics alone could not carry. Hitchcock understands how frightening an ordinary place can become once we know something is wrong. At 77 minutes, the film has little space to waste, which makes its occasional distractions more noticeable.

Sylvia Sidney gives Mrs. Verloc enough emotional substance to prevent the film becoming an exercise in threatening people we scarcely know. We care about her because Sidney makes the domestic relationships seem worth protecting, even when the plotting demands more attention than it deserves. Oskar Homolka, as Karl Verloc, is absorbing without making the man easy to understand, and his performance sustains interest where the writing leaves questions. Desmond Tester gives Stevie a place in that family, so our concern for him begins with his relationship to his sister.

The aquarium sequence shows Hitchcock’s control at its most assured. Bernard Knowles’s photography makes the setting feel inhospitable, giving an ordinary public attraction a chill that needs little explanation. We felt uneasy because a place devoted to quietly looking at fish had become a place to fear the people. The setting does useful work: it makes the encounter strange without making it remote from everyday life, and allows Hitchcock to suggest how close danger can come to an innocent outing.

Charles Frend’s editing gives the suspense time to gather, making anticipation an uncomfortable part of watching. We have time to imagine what might go wrong before the film presses on. The music, credited to Jack Beaver, Hubert Bath and Louis Levy, supports that unease without becoming the chief source of it. We remember the aquarium more readily than a musical phrase, and the film benefits from giving the pictures so much responsibility.

Charles Bennett’s screenplay adapts a novel by Joseph Conrad, and the underlying intrigue is not always as clear or persuasive as the immediate threat. Some motives remain obscure long enough to distract us from what is happening in front of us. The comic interludes cause a different problem: they loosen the tension without consistently earning the interruption. Humour can make screen danger nastier by catching us unprepared, but here it sometimes feels as though we have wandered into another film just when the first one was getting somewhere.

By the usual crime-thriller measure of how neatly everything has been arranged, Sabotage is imperfect. Hitchcock’s treatment of the family makes neatness seem a secondary concern, although it cannot excuse every awkward change of tone. We recommend it to anyone who wants suspense with some emotional risk; save the comfortable detective story for another evening.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

71
Positive
3
Mixed
2
Negative
0
Radio Times
★★★★ · Tom Hutchinson
80

The review presents the film as an unnerving, suspenseful Hitchcock thriller. It singles out the scene in which a boy carries a time-bomb aboard a bus as especially unsettling.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· PT
75*

The review presents the film as one of Hitchcock’s most playful British thrillers. It singles out its playful approach and adaptation from Joseph Conrad’s novel.

Read the full review →
Empire
14 June 2006 · David Parkinson
65*

The critic finds the film an atmospheric, pessimistic London thriller, while acknowledging Hitchcock’s reservations and the film’s flaws. He especially praises the suspenseful build-up and the devastating scene of Winnie watching a cartoon after learning of Steve’s death.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1935 · Variety Staff
60*

The review finds the film smartly made but held back by an outmoded, obscure story. It praises Oscar Homolka’s performance as a brilliant piece of character acting.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
31 August 2008 · Jeff Robson
75*

Robson finds the film a gem of cinematic storytelling, though its comic interludes blunt the impact. He especially praises the chilling aquarium sequence and the film’s growing technical ambition.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Sabotage worth watching?
Sabotage is worth watching for suspense with emotional weight, and we score it 77 out of 100. Hitchcock makes an ordinary aquarium feel threatening, while Sylvia Sidney gives us reason to care about the family near the bomb plot; obscure motives and ill-timed comedy keep it from being wholly satisfying.
How long is Sabotage, and what is it rated?
Sabotage runs 1h 17m. It is a drama and thriller film.
Where can I watch Sabotage in Ireland?
Sabotage is not on any streaming or rental service in Ireland at the moment. It is available in 7 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is Sabotage, and is it suitable for children?
Sabotage has a UK PG certificate, but its bomb plot and threats close to a family make it an unsettling choice for children. We find the suspense unusually cruel rather than comfortable, so parental guidance matters particularly for younger or sensitive viewers; the certificate should not be mistaken for a promise of gentle entertainment.
How does Sabotage compare to The Conversation?
Sabotage offers family-centred danger and an unusually cruel streak, while The Conversation builds patient suspense through repeated listening, uncertain motives and loneliness. We recommend The Conversation more confidently, despite some over-arranged plotting; Sabotage suits those drawn to domestic relationships under threat, provided they can accept comedy that sometimes interrupts the tension.
Is Sabotage based on a true story or a book?
Sabotage is adapted from a novel by Joseph Conrad, with a screenplay by Charles Bennett, rather than presented as a true story. We find some of the intrigue obscure, but the immediate threat and family relationships give a newcomer enough to engage with; reading the novel first is not a prerequisite.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Fallen Idol (1948) · not on Fi1m yetFor another child’s view of adult behaviour that deserves closer supervision.

  2. Le Corbeau (1943) · not on Fi1m yetFor a small community where suspicion makes ordinary encounters feel poisonous.

  3. The Conversation (1974, Fi1m 92)For patient suspense built from overheard words and uncertain motives.

  4. Mother (2009) · not on Fi1m yetFor family loyalty tested by a criminal investigation and uncomfortable doubts.

  5. Night Train to Munich (1940) · not on Fi1m yetFor another brisk thriller that lets comedy complicate the danger.