Film review

Scarface

1983 · Directed by Brian De Palma · 2h 50m · MPA R

In a sentenceAl Pacino makes wanting more money sound like a threat to everyone within earshot

ActionCrimeDrama

Tony Montana (Al Pacino) is a Cuban refugee in Miami who sees the cocaine trade as a route to money and power. He wants to move upwards, and violence is part of the business he chooses. Brian De Palma directs Oliver Stone’s screenplay about ambition and criminality, with Steven Bauer as Manny Ray, Michelle Pfeiffer as Elvira and Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio as Gina. Robert Loggia plays Frank Lopez. Tony’s pursuit of wealth places him among people for whom success means having more than the next man.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Brian De Palma’s Scarface is an absorbing, ugly account of criminal ambition, driven by Al Pacino’s ferocious performance. Its 170 minutes include some unnecessary insistence, but the vulgarity has a point.

Scarface is a forceful gangster film whose excess mostly earns its keep, though it repeats itself too often. Brian De Palma and screenwriter Oliver Stone follow Tony Montana, a Cuban refugee in Miami, into the cocaine trade with little interest in making his ambition respectable. Wealth is something he wants without qualification, and Al Pacino makes that wanting uncomfortable to watch. There is little comfort here for anyone who likes a criminal to explain why he had no choice.

Pacino’s performance is pitched high, but there is thought behind the volume. The swagger has an ugly impatience: Tony seems to regard everyone else’s existence as a delay in his own advancement. That makes him funny in a way that soon becomes unpleasant, and Pacino is willing to stay unpleasant long after a more ingratiating performance might have asked for sympathy. Tony’s desires are easy to recognise, however much his behaviour makes us recoil.

John A. Alonzo’s cinematography gives the gaudy surroundings a harshness that suits Tony, while Ferdinando Scarfiotti’s production design makes the display of wealth feel increasingly oppressive. The decoration looks exhausting, and that seems exactly right for a man with Tony’s appetite. De Palma allows the ugliness to register without constantly competing for our attention. His relative visual restraint matters, because Pacino is already supplying enough aggression to dominate the image.

The chainsaw sequence is where the film’s brutality becomes hardest to stomach. We were horrified by it; the threat of the tool is enough to make the criminal swagger turn sickening. De Palma understands how quickly anticipation can remove the pleasure from watching dangerous people, and the sequence makes violence feel like something to dread. It also complicates the invitation to enjoy Tony’s nerve, which matters in a film so often carried by his confidence.

The weakness is repetition, particularly across a running time of 170 minutes. Editors David Ray and Gerald B. Greenberg give Pacino room to establish Tony’s appetite, then leave him more room to establish it again. Stone’s dialogue can be viciously funny, but the repeated aggression gradually becomes less revealing, and some exchanges continue beyond their usefulness. Giorgio Moroder’s score adds another emphatic presence beside the acting. Its pressure suits the film, although quieter stretches would have given both the music and Pacino more force.

As a gangster film, Scarface is unusually unwilling to offer the consolation of criminal honour. Stone’s interest in acquisitiveness is plain enough, and De Palma gives it a suitably disagreeable setting. There is a limit to how much insight comes from watching a greedy man want still more, which is why the film can feel thinner as it gets longer. Yet the humour and horror make that greed more unsettling than a tidy speech about the American dream would have done.

The reason to stay is Pacino, whose performance remains absorbing even when the writing is repeating its point. De Palma lets us enjoy the force of Tony’s personality while making the violence difficult to dismiss, and the unease survives the film’s lapses of pace. Give it an evening when a long, abrasive crime film sounds appealing; it is poor company for anyone hoping to relax.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

65
Positive
6
Mixed
1
Negative
2

Most critics respond warmly to Scarface’s excess, with praise clustering around Al Pacino’s swaggering, ferocious performance as Tony Montana. Even the harsher reviews find him magnetic, while supporters credit Brian De Palma’s direction with giving the criminal world both visual flair and a sense of sleaze. The favourable readings see a bitter satire of greed and acquisitive culture, with sharp dialogue, dark humour and forceful set pieces making its broad style feel purposeful.

The spread is wide, however, and the same excess attracts complaints about overacting, length and garishness. The Hollywood Reporter admires Pacino but finds little else to recommend, criticising Oliver Stone’s dialogue and De Palma’s plodding direction; Eye for Film likewise finds the film dated and lacking in heart despite its lead performance. Between those positions, the reservations concern whether the outrageous behaviour yields much insight, and whether the pacing can sustain the film’s scale.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Andy Gill
80*

The critic praises Al Pacino's spectacular performance as Tony Montana, highlighting his demonic intensity and swagger. They note the film's initial critical disdain but defend it as a black-hearted satire on excess and acquisitive culture.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

This update of the 1932 classic relocates the story to Miami and follows the rise and fall of a Cuban refugee turned cocaine kingpin. Al Pacino delivers one of his finest performances alongside strong support, with sharp dialogue and vivid cinematography making it a modern classic, though some may find the excesses off-putting.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
7 September 2006 · Martyn Bamber
80*

Praises the remake as superior to most updates of classics, highlighting De Palma's visual restraint and the film's portrayal of a gaudy, sleazy world with humor and horror elements.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
75*

The critic highlights Al Pacino's spectacularly over-the-top performance as Tony Montana in the drug trade rise-and-fall story. They praise De Palma's notable sequences and describe the film as visceral with flair.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
7 October 2003 · Scott Tobias
75*

The review discusses how the film has been misinterpreted in hip-hop culture but praises De Palma's subversive, raw take on the gangster genre as a trashy counterpoint to The Godfather, highlighting Pacino's energetic performance.

Read the full review →
Time Out
18 August 2009 · ★★★ · Tom Huddleston
60

The film’s outrageous excess powers a fun, unashamed study of selfish criminality without any Godfather-style honour and family guff, though its unironic adoption by certain subcultures highlights its ludicrous aspects over piercing insight.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Director, 1984

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Director

If you liked this, try…

The Long Good Friday poster88

The Long Good Friday

1980 · Another ambitious gangster discovers how little his confidence can settle.

A Prophet poster86

A Prophet

2009 · A patient account of criminal advancement, with each compromise made painfully clear.

The Public Enemy poster

The Public Enemy

1931 · For a shorter, harsher look at ambition with a gun.

Pusher poster

Pusher

1996 · A smaller criminal operation, with the pressure felt at closer quarters.

Sonatine poster

Sonatine

1993 · For a quieter gangster film, where waiting becomes its own source of dread.