Shrek, Donkey, and Puss in Boots stand aboard a sailing ship
Film review

Shrek the Third

2007 · Directed by Chris Miller · 1h 33m · MPA PG

In a sentenceA frog king takes four goes to die and gets the biggest laugh; the rest of the film should have taken the hint

Far Far Away. King Harold (John Cleese), who has been a frog since his last adventure, is dying, and Shrek (Mike Myers) and Princess Fiona (Cameron Diaz) have been standing in for him at court: knighting courtiers, christening ships, splitting the royal tights. On his deathbed Harold names Shrek his heir, with one alternative: Fiona’s cousin Arthur, a boy away at a school called Worcestershire. Shrek sets sail to fetch him with Donkey (Eddie Murphy) and Puss in Boots (Antonio Banderas), and as the ship pulls out Fiona shouts from the quay that she is pregnant. Artie (Justin Timberlake) turns out to be the most picked-on pupil in the school. Back home, Prince Charming (Rupert Everett), reduced to dinner theatre, gathers the fairy-tale villains in the Poison Apple tavern and proposes they take the kingdom.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Chris Miller’s third outing is handsomely built and has about twenty minutes of jokes in it. Shrek’s reluctance to rule is stated in the first reel and then repeated for an hour, while Donkey and Puss wait in the wings.

Chris Miller directs the third Shrek film from a script he wrote with Jeffrey Price, Peter S. Seaman and Aron Warner, and its question is whether an ogre who has spent two films refusing to be anybody’s hero can be made to run a kingdom. The answer is no, and the film gives it inside ten minutes. Standing in for his ailing father-in-law, Shrek (Mike Myers) knights a man badly, splits his tights in front of the court and sinks a ship with the bottle meant to christen it. Everything that follows, all 93 minutes of it, makes that point again.

The best scene is the king’s death. John Cleese’s Harold, a frog since the last film, lies in state on a lily pad, gathers himself for his final words, croaks, and dies; then does not; then does again, while the mourners begin their lament too early each time and have to trail off. We laughed, properly and more than once, which we had not expected to, and the credit belongs to the editors, Joyce Arrastia and Michael Andrews, who hold on the frog a beat longer than is decent every time. The funeral that follows is sung by a chorus of frogs to a Wings song, and that is funny too.

Rupert Everett’s Prince Charming is the other thing the script gets right. Reduced to dinner theatre, performing his own life story to an audience that heckles him, he gathers the fairy-tale villains at the Poison Apple tavern and interrogates Pinocchio (Cody Cameron) about Shrek’s whereabouts, and the puppet’s long, grammatically perfect refusal to lie is the sharpest minute of writing in the film. Everett plays Charming as a man wounded in his vanity rather than his ambition, and he is the only character on screen who wants something badly. Doris the ugly stepsister (Larry King) tends the bar in a voice an octave below everyone else’s.

It is a handsome object. Guillaume Aretos’s Far Far Away is Beverly Hills with turrets, palm trees down the boulevards and boutiques under the castle walls, and Artie’s school is a prep school built inside a keep, with jousting on the playing field and cheerleaders in wimples. Shrek’s skin takes the light like wet clay, and the water in the harbour moves as water does. Israel Segal’s costumes give Fiona a wardrobe of gowns the plot never finds a use for. Harry Gregson-Williams’s score runs on fanfares and keeps the pop songs down to a few, which after two films of them we counted as a kindness.

The trouble is Artie, and the trouble is the middle. Justin Timberlake voices him as a sarcastic American teenager, and the film’s one idea about him is that he thinks he is a loser and needs telling otherwise. Shrek tells him. Merlin (Eric Idle), a wizard who has retired to a clearing in his dressing gown after some sort of breakdown, tells him. Shrek tells him again. The sea voyage out and back takes up most of the running time, and it is where Donkey (Eddie Murphy) and Puss in Boots (Antonio Banderas), who between them carried the previous film, are reduced to the odd aside; they are handed one gag in the second half that ought to have run for a reel and is dropped after a scene. By the midpoint we were bored, and then faintly cross about being bored, because Andrew Adamson, who co-directed the first two films and has only a story credit here, knew how to keep an ogre, a donkey and a cat talking.

Fiona (Cameron Diaz) does better than her husband. Her news that she is pregnant, shouted from the quay as his ship pulls out, gives Shrek a nightmare in which the castle fills with ogre babies, and the sequence has the panic the rest of the film lacks. Back at the palace she and Queen Lillian (Julie Andrews) host a baby shower for a set of princesses, and the second half gives the women a strand we will not describe except to say it is livelier than the men’s.

Shrek began as a jab at the Disney fairy tale. By this third film it is an institution itself, and it behaves like one: agreeable, well made and nearly without malice, where the first two ran on cheek. It is a U, and children who like Donkey will be content for an hour and a half. Adults will laugh at the frog and the puppet and then check how long is left. Watch it at home, where you can go back to the frog.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

47
Positive
1
Mixed
8
Negative
10

Most critics call this a tired third outing. The reviews lean negative: ten are unfavourable, eight are mixed and only one is positive. The complaint that recurs is a thin, half-baked story and jokes that land less often than they did in the first two films, with several reviewers writing that the series has run out of ideas. The praise, such as it is, goes to the animation, which most agree has weight and polish, and to the supporting cast: Eddie Murphy’s Donkey and Antonio Banderas’s Puss in Boots, the Gingerbread Man, and the early sight gags before the quest plot settles in.

The spread is fairly wide. At one end, Paste finds the film as entertaining as the original and better than the second; at the other, The Guardian thinks the series should have stopped after part two. In between, critics split over whom it serves: some say it will still divert young children, while the Los Angeles Times finds too many of the jokes aimed at adults.

Variety
15 May 2007 · Todd McCarthy
65*

McCarthy finds the film amusing and stylish, though its middle section loses momentum. He praises the visual storytelling and especially the playful design of the stage productions framing the film.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
10 May 2007 · John Hazelton
64*

The visible excerpt gives no clear critical verdict, focusing instead on the film’s likely box-office performance. It does not reveal what the critic praises or criticizes about the film.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
18 May 2007
64*

The review’s verdict and specific praise or criticism cannot be established from the inaccessible page. The available page text contains no review details.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
17 May 2007 · ★★½/4 · Roger Ebert
62

Ebert finds the film a disappointing follow-up, though it has moments of amusement. He singles out its diminished comic freshness compared with the earlier films.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Jamie Russell
60

Russell finds the film entertaining but weakened by franchise fatigue and a half-baked storyline. He praises the lively double act between Eddie Murphy’s Donkey and Antonio Banderas’s Puss-in-Boots.

Read the full review →
Time Out
16 May 2007 · ★★★
60

Time Out suggests the third installment is a disappointment rather than a magical return. It notes that, unlike some other recent trilogy finales, the film has at least one redeeming quality, though the available excerpt does not reveal what it is.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Shrek the Third worth watching?
Shrek the Third is worth watching only for the frog king's death scene and Rupert Everett's Prince Charming, and we scored it 50. It is handsomely made and nearly without malice, but Shrek's reluctance to rule is stated in the first ten minutes and repeated for an hour, while Donkey and Puss are left with the odd aside. Children who like Donkey will be content; adults will laugh twice and check how long is left.
How long is Shrek the Third, and what is it rated?
Shrek the Third runs 1h 33m and is rated PG by the MPA in the US. It is a fantasy and adventure film.
Where can I watch Shrek the Third in the US?
Shrek the Third is streaming on Peacock, The Roku Channel and Amazon Prime Video in the US, and it is also available to rent from Apple TV and Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Shrek the Third compare to Shrek?
Shrek the Third is the weaker film, and the first Shrek is the one to choose. The original runs on cheek, with a jab at the Disney fairy tale and an ogre and a donkey who are funny whenever they talk; the third has become an institution and behaves like one, agreeable and well built but short of jokes. Only the frog's funeral and Pinocchio's refusal to lie match the earlier film's best.
What should I watch after Shrek the Third?
After Shrek the Third, try Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975, Fi1m 87): Cleese and Idle on Arthurian legend, with a budget of about four coconuts. Then The Princess Bride (1987, Fi1m 86): The fairy tale sent up with affection, and the swordplay is real; and Ernest & Celestine (2012, Fi1m 84): A French bear and mouse; an animated comedy that never once raises its voice.

Part of · 2 of 2

Shrek

2 films on Fi1m · 2001–2007 · average 65 · best Shrek 80

All 2 in order

Cast

Awards

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Animated Movie, 2008

Nominated
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Animated Movie

If you liked this, try…

  1. Shrek 2 (2004) · not on Fi1m yetThe one where the jokes still had teeth and Puss in Boots arrived.

  2. Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975, Fi1m 87)Cleese and Idle on Arthurian legend, with a budget of about four coconuts.

  3. The Sword in the Stone (1963) · not on Fi1m yetAnother unpromising boy called Arthur, another wizard; gentler, shorter and funnier.

  4. The Princess Bride (1987, Fi1m 86)The fairy tale sent up with affection, and the swordplay is real.

  5. Ernest & Celestine (2012, Fi1m 84)A French bear and mouse; an animated comedy that never once raises its voice.