Charles Driggs reaches across the counter for M&M's in a convenience store
Film review

Something Wild

1986 · Directed by Jonathan Demme · 1h 54m

In a sentenceJeff Daniels makes being led astray look like a difficult administrative decision

Charles Driggs (Jeff Daniels) and Audrey Hankel (Melanie Griffith) are an unlikely pair at the centre of a road trip involving sexual attraction and petty crime. Their encounter takes Charles away from respectable routines and into the company of someone less concerned with keeping to them. As the two get to know each other, romance competes with the complications of their journey. Jonathan Demme directs Frye’s story, which combines crime, comedy and romance against a backdrop of everyday American life. Ray Liotta also stars as Ray Sinclair.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Jonathan Demme’s crime comedy is funny, sexy and unusually fond of the people other films would hurry past. Jeff Daniels and Melanie Griffith make it worth following, even when the script begins to settle for familiar trouble.

Something Wild is funny, sexy and generous towards its oddballs; we recommend it, with a reservation about where the script takes them. Jonathan Demme takes the familiar prospect of a respectable man being led astray and gives the strangers around him more attention than that premise requires. The pleasure comes from meeting them, watching them and wondering what they might do. The trouble comes when Frye’s screenplay has to make all that wandering serve a plot.

Jeff Daniels makes Charles Driggs’s self-consciousness funny without asking us to despise him for it. Opposite Melanie Griffith’s Audrey Hankel, he seems to be working out how much enthusiasm he can safely admit. Griffith gives their early encounters an ease that makes his hesitation funnier, and their attraction does not need explaining. We laughed at his efforts to look comfortable with her sexual confidence, then felt unexpectedly fond of him. Daniels keeps the embarrassment small enough to recognise.

As Ray Sinclair, Ray Liotta gives the film a threat that makes us watch him closely. His force sharpens the responses of the other two leads, without reducing them to supporting players in their own story. Griffith, in particular, has enough range to keep Audrey from becoming merely an invitation for Charles to enjoy himself. Demme remains interested in her when the easy joke would be to make everything about his discomfort.

Tak Fujimoto’s cinematography makes room for faces, including those belonging to people who will never carry the story. That attention supports Demme’s interest in the ordinary places the journey passes through, giving us reasons to look beyond the central couple. Norma Moriceau’s production design and costumes make the film’s 1980s fashions hard to miss. Some choices now draw attention to themselves, but the care given to the surroundings helps the minor encounters feel like something more than interruptions.

Craig McKay’s editing gives the opening a welcome headlong pace without losing the small hesitations that make Daniels funny. The changes of mood are less consistently persuasive, although the performances provide continuity when the storytelling becomes abrupt. Laurie Anderson and John Cale provide the music, alongside a rock soundtrack that makes the journey feel sociable and unpredictable. The songs sustain the excitement of going somewhere new, even when the plot becomes easier to anticipate.

The principal weakness is Frye’s increasingly conventional plotting. The opening lets attraction and bad judgement set the pace, and for a while almost any encounter seems worth following. As the crime story becomes more insistent, it leaves less room for the casual comedy and incidental people that first interested us. A smaller reservation is that petty crime is treated as an attractive habit rather too readily. Demme and the cast keep it entertaining, but the later situations are less surprising than the behaviour in those early encounters.

Within the comedy of a respectable man getting into trouble, Demme’s warmth makes a substantial difference. He does not assume that eccentricity makes someone ridiculous, or that a small part deserves only a single joke. His attention to the people surrounding Charles and Audrey gives the film pleasures beyond the couple’s chemistry. Choose it for Daniels and Griffith, and allow for a script that becomes less adventurous than they are.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

74
Positive
13
Mixed
0
Negative
1
The AV Club
11 May 2011 · A · Scott Tobias
95

Directed by Jonathan Demme at the top of his game, the film takes viewers on an exciting, dynamic, wonderfully unpredictable ride grounded in the idea that romance is like a long, sometimes contentious negotiation between opposites who grow a little. The opposites-attract chemistry between Griffith and Daniels is electrifying, full of danger, kink, and spark.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
9 May 2011 · Joseph Jon Lanthier
85*

One of Demme’s best films, it stylizes characters addicted to reinvention as a means of expression and exposing absurdity, providing a rhythm to which we can revolutionize our private lives through personal revisionism that is humanistic rather than masturbatory.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
70*

The film is breezy fun as an artefact of the mid-80s. It singles out the superb soundtrack and bizarro cameos for praise while noting that the trendiness dates fast.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
6 November 1986 · Sheila Benson
70*

Demme returns to form with a free-spirited road movie that mixes '60s energy and '80s yuppie satire, buoyed by three standout performances from Griffith, Daniels, and Liotta. Benson highlights the vibrant soundtrack and production design while noting a lingering late-'60s attitude toward petty crime that feels dated.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
7 November 1986 · Roger Ebert
70*

The film starts with a headlong erotic charge in its opening scenes but settles into a more conventional groove later on. It remains a good movie thanks to Demme's skill at finding the bizarre in the ordinary and the strong chemistry between Daniels and Griffith.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
10 November 1986 · Pauline Kael
70*

Demme turns a familiar genre premise into something authentically wild, crossing from anarchic screwball comedy into scary slapstick thriller territory. Kael singles out the performances—especially Griffith's range and Daniels' subtle transitions—and Demme's democratic eye for bit players and pop-culture energy.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Something Wild worth watching?
Something Wild is worth watching for anyone who enjoys a crime comedy that is fonder of its oddballs than its plot, and we scored it 82. Jeff Daniels and Melanie Griffith carry it, and Jonathan Demme's attention to the strangers along the road is the real pleasure. The script grows more conventional as the crime story takes over.
How long is Something Wild, and what is it rated?
Something Wild runs 1h 54m. It is a crime and comedy film.
Where can I watch Something Wild in Croatia?
Something Wild is not on any streaming or rental service in Croatia at the moment. It is available in 29 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is Something Wild, and is it suitable for children?
Something Wild carries a US R certificate and has no UK rating, so it is not for children. It involves sexual attraction handled with some frankness, petty crime treated as an attractive habit, and a real sense of threat once Ray Liotta's Ray Sinclair appears. Adults and older teenagers used to that mix will not find it hard to take.
How does Something Wild compare to After Hours?
Something Wild is the warmer film and After Hours the more unnerving one, though both follow a respectable man escaping his routine. Demme is generous towards his eccentrics and gives Melanie Griffith a full character; Scorsese keeps his predicament tighter and sharper, and his women exist chiefly to frighten Griffin Dunne. Choose Demme for company and Scorsese for anxiety.
What should I watch after Something Wild?
After Something Wild, try After Hours (1985, Fi1m 80): Another respectable man’s escape from routine, with considerably less reassurance. Then The Lady Eve (1941, Fi1m 90): Barbara Stanwyck makes seduction look effortless and male dignity look temporary; and The Last Seduction (1994, Fi1m 81): For the attraction to bad behaviour, with the kindness removed.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. After Hours (1985, Fi1m 80)Another respectable man’s escape from routine, with considerably less reassurance.

  2. The Lady Eve (1941, Fi1m 90)Barbara Stanwyck makes seduction look effortless and male dignity look temporary.

  3. Pierrot le Fou (1965) · not reviewed yetRomance, crime and a road journey that refuses to behave.

  4. The Last Seduction (1994, Fi1m 81)For the attraction to bad behaviour, with the kindness removed.

  5. Wild Tales (2014, Fi1m 83)Argentinian comic nightmares where ordinary frustrations become dangerous with alarming speed.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever