The Kodiak Bear faces Tom (Tchéky Karyo) on a rocky mountain ledge
Film review

The Bear

1988 · Directed by Jean-Jacques Annaud · 1h 37m

In a sentenceA small bear does most of the emotional work; the music would still like some credit

Youk the Bear Cub (Douce the Bear) is orphaned and has to survive without his mother. The Kodiak Bear (Bart the Bear) also figures in an adventure involving Tom (Tchéky Karyo), Bill (Jack Wallace) and The Dog Hunter (André Lacombe). For the cub, the journey is a matter of staying alive before he can look after himself. The story follows the bears, with the humans sharing a world that the cub has barely begun to learn.

Fi1m review

Jean-Jacques Annaud’s animal adventure earns our affection, then sometimes presses too hard for it. The bears are absorbing company, and Philippe Rousselot’s location photography makes this worth an evening if the genre appeals.

The Bear is a good animal adventure, although it sometimes insists on feelings the bears have already earned. Jean-Jacques Annaud builds his film around an orphaned cub’s struggle to survive, trusting animals to hold our interest where another director might hurry back to the people. The danger with that premise is easy sentiment. For much of its 97 minutes, the bears need little help keeping us interested.

Douce the Bear, credited as Youk the Bear Cub, gives the film its most immediate appeal. We were moved by the cub’s vulnerability: the effort simply to survive makes his smallness matter more than his charm. Bart the Bear, as The Kodiak Bear, has a quite different physical authority, and the two animals give us plenty to watch. Their expressive presence does more for the film than its occasional insistence on how we should respond.

Philippe Rousselot’s location photography is a substantial pleasure, though beauty on its own would soon turn this into a rather long diversion. What works is the attention he gives the bears within their surroundings: they command our interest without making everything around them irrelevant. The landscape looks worth spending time in, but the animals remain the reason to look. There is enough visual interest here to support the director’s confidence in telling the story through them.

Noëlle Boisson’s editing has the less conspicuous task of making animal behaviour carry a dramatic sequence, and it largely succeeds. We can follow the feeling without having every response put into words. Yet there are moments when the arrangement of those responses feels too tidy, as though a bear has been assigned precisely the emotion the scene requires. The wish to make the animals understandable occasionally leaves too little room for them to be animals.

Philippe Sarde’s music has the same problem at times. Its warmth suits the film, but the emphasis on tenderness can feel unnecessary when the cub already has our sympathy. Gérard Brach’s screenplay, drawing on a novel by James Oliver Curwood, is strongest when survival is enough to hold the attention. A little less encouragement from the score would have helped, especially when the animals are already doing the work.

As a family adventure, the film asks for more patience than a string of animal tricks, and rewards it. It takes the cub’s survival seriously, which is the right reason to make an audience care about him. The family label should not suggest that an orphaned animal’s predicament is merely decorative. We would be guided by a child’s response to that premise rather than assuming that a bear cub guarantees a comfortable evening.

At 97 minutes, The Bear gives this simple adventure a sensible amount of space, even if the emotional prompting occasionally becomes tiresome. Its bears are expressive enough to justify the attention they receive, and the photography deserves a large screen. We recommend it to anyone content to spend an evening watching animals. Enjoy the bears, and forgive the occasional nudge from the score.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

76
Positive
2
Mixed
2
Negative
0
Empire
1 January 2000 · Phil Thomas
95*

The critic calls the film astonishing and breathtaking, placing it in a league of its own among animal movies. He singles out the bears’ remarkable performances and the beautiful location photography.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
25 October 1989 · Janet Maslin
80*

The review is broadly appreciative of Annaud’s film and its visual storytelling. It singles out the bears’ expressive presence as a strength.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
65*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict and specific praise or complaint are unavailable. No review text or rating was visible to verify.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
64*

The available page text does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It also does not provide enough detail to identify what the review singles out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Bear worth watching?
The Bear is worth watching if patient animal adventures appeal to you; we score it 78 out of 100. The bears hold our attention and Philippe Rousselot’s location photography is a substantial pleasure, though the music sometimes presses for sympathy the orphaned cub has already earned.
How long is The Bear, and what is it rated?
The Bear runs 1h 37m. It is an adventure and drama film.
Where can I watch The Bear in Iceland?
The Bear is not on any streaming or rental service in Iceland at the moment. It is available in 6 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How does The Bear compare to Babe?
The Bear is the better choice for a patient survival adventure, while we recommend Babe for a funnier family evening with more talkative animals. Both take small, vulnerable lives seriously, but The Bear relies more on animal behaviour and landscape, with occasional musical nudges towards feelings that need little encouragement.
Is The Bear based on a true story or a book?
The Bear is adapted from a novel by James Oliver Curwood, with a screenplay by Gérard Brach, rather than presented as a true story. Its straightforward account of an orphaned cub’s struggle to survive needs no prior knowledge of the book; we find it strongest when that struggle alone holds our attention.
What should I watch after The Bear?
After The Bear, try Babe (1995, Fi1m 88): More talkative animals, but the same serious concern for small, vulnerable lives. Then The Red Turtle (2016, Fi1m 84): For more storytelling through movement, with even less need for spoken explanation.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1990

Nominated
Best Film Editing

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Black Stallion (1979) · not reviewed yetAnother animal adventure that earns its feeling through patient, attentive looking.

  2. Babe (1995, Fi1m 88)More talkative animals, but the same serious concern for small, vulnerable lives.

  3. The Red Turtle (2016, Fi1m 84)For more storytelling through movement, with even less need for spoken explanation.

  4. EO (2022) · not reviewed yetFor adults: another animal’s journey, with considerably less comfort about human behaviour.

  5. The Wild Child (1970) · not reviewed yetA sterner account of dependence, learning and the difficult business of care.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever