Film review

The Perks of Being a Wallflower

2012 · Directed by Stephen Chbosky · 1h 43m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceA shy boy, two seniors and a pickup truck, and the pickup truck gets the best scene

Drama

A Pittsburgh suburb in the early 1990s. Charlie (Logan Lerman) starts high school with no friends, a best friend who killed himself the year before, and a habit of writing letters to a stranger. His English teacher Mr. Anderson (Paul Rudd) slips him paperbacks. At a football game he sits next to Patrick (Ezra Miller), a senior from his shop class, and meets Patrick’s stepsister Sam (Emma Watson). They take him to a party, to the homecoming dance, to the Friday-night Rocky Horror show run by Mary Elizabeth (Mae Whitman), and through a tunnel at night with the radio up. Charlie wants to belong somewhere and to keep it.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Stephen Chbosky directs his own novel with more feeling than polish. Three young leads, Ezra Miller above all, make it worth an evening; a crowded script and a hurried last act stop it being more than that.

Stephen Chbosky published The Perks of Being a Wallflower as a novel in 1999 and adapts and directs it himself, an arrangement that usually means nobody could tell him no. It has gone better than that. The film is sincere, kind to its characters and well acted by its three young leads, and it is clumsy in the ways first films are clumsy: too many subjects, a voice-over that tells us what the faces have already said, and a last twenty minutes that rush the hardest material. We liked it, joins and all.

Charlie (Logan Lerman) starts high school in a Pittsburgh suburb in the early 1990s, counting the days until he can leave. His best friend killed himself the year before; his aunt Helen (Melanie Lynskey) is dead too. In shop class there is Patrick (Ezra Miller), a senior who answers back and gets nicknamed Nothing for it. Charlie sits next to him at a football game, meets his stepsister Sam (Emma Watson), and within a week has friends, a party and a homecoming dance. Lerman plays him with his shoulders up and his eyes down and lets both come down a fraction at a time.

Miller is the reason to see it. Patrick is the loud one, and Miller puts a nervousness under the performance that shows only when nobody at the table is looking at him. His scenes with Johnny Simmons’s Brad, a footballer, are the most carefully written in the film. Watson has the harder job, because Sam is the girl the boy adores and the script gives her more adjectives than lines; she is better than the part. Mae Whitman’s Mary Elizabeth, the Buddhist punk who runs the Friday-night Rocky Horror show and decides Charlie is her boyfriend, is funny and slightly frightening, which is right.

Andrew Dunn shoots it warm: brown autumn light in the corridors, lamps rather than ceiling lights in the bedrooms. Inbal Weinberg keeps Charlie’s room nearly bare, a bed and a desk and the paperbacks his English teacher Mr. Anderson (Paul Rudd) hands him, and covers every wall of Sam and Patrick’s house in posters and snapshots. Michael Brook’s score is quiet guitar that stays out of the way of the songs.

The tunnel is the scene everyone remembers. Patrick drives, Charlie sits in the middle, and Sam climbs into the back of the pickup and stands as they go in with the radio up. Mary Jo Markey cuts between Lerman’s face in the passenger seat and Watson with her arms out and the orange lights going past, and Brook lets the song do the rest. We were got at, plainly and completely. We then spent the remaining hour wondering how three teenagers this devoted to their record collections had failed to recognise David Bowie’s “Heroes”.

The trouble is quantity. Chbosky’s book gave Charlie a year and everything in it, and the film keeps nearly all of it in 103 minutes: a dead aunt, a dead friend, a sister (Nina Dobrev) whose boyfriend hits her, a first kiss, a first drug, a secret romance, and the letters to a stranger holding the pieces together. The letters, read by Lerman in a soft, careful voice, keep stepping in to explain feelings the actors have already shown us. And when the darkest of these things arrives, late, Markey cuts it as though the film has a train to catch, and it is over before we have caught up. We felt hurried.

Rudd says almost nothing and it is the right amount; Kate Walsh and Dylan McDermott play the parents as decent people who do not see what is in front of them. John Hughes made this film several times in the 1980s with the sadness taken out; Chbosky has put it back and lost some of the jokes doing so.

That is a fair trade for the audience the film is for, who are fifteen and will not notice the joins. For the rest of us it is a warm, honest, overstuffed evening, best watched at home with someone who once made a mixtape.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

65
Positive
13
Mixed
5
Negative
3

Most critics like it, and almost all of them like the cast. Ezra Miller is named again and again as the standout, with Logan Lerman close behind for a lead several reviews call charming and vulnerable, and Emma Watson credited with breaking type. Reviews are warm about the film’s sincerity: Stephen Chbosky, adapting his own novel, is felt to understand his teenagers and to put the audience on their side from the first scene.

The reservations cluster on familiarity. Even admirers concede the film is built from coming-of-age tropes, and the less persuaded find the voice-over and soundtrack studied, the heavy issues rushed and the direction more passionate than skilled. The spread is wide, from raves to a handful of outright dismissals. Slant calls it manipulative and condescending, The Skinny thinks the script mistakes a record collection for a personality, and The Guardian finds it cluttered and obvious.

Vulture
20 September 2012 · David Edelstein
85*

Chbosky captures the exquisite feeling of belonging among friends while sensing its fleeting nature and the pain of loss. The film nails teenage alienation through strong performances and a nostalgic yet pained evocation of early-90s misfit life.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
20 September 2012 · Betsy Sharkey
80*

The film is a smartly observed study of a troubled teen’s first year in high school thanks to strong performances from its young cast. Ezra Miller in particular brings jolts of electricity to teen conversations.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
3 October 2013
70*

The film is a compendium of high-school coming-of-age tropes but executes them with rare intensity, sweetness and purity. It earns its sentimentality through strong performances, especially from Ezra Miller and Emma Watson, and a convincing central trio.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
27 August 2012 · Violet Lucca
70*

The adaptation is more restrained than the source novel in its handling of trauma and omits some darker elements. It benefits from strong performances by the young cast and a focus on showing rather than telling Charlie's story.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
8 September 2012 · festival review
70*

The review notes that while the film offers little new on adolescent angst, it potently captures the immediacy of teen life through strong performances and emotional observation. Ezra Miller’s turn as Patrick is highlighted as a standout for its charisma and complexity.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
21 September 2012 · Manohla Dargis
70*

The adaptation is likable and unsurprising, serving mainly as a showcase for its young cast. Ezra Miller stands out with texture in his role as the witty gay quipster.

Read the full review →

Cast

If you liked this, try…