Hank Dolworth (Donal Logue) and Britt Pollack (Michael Raymond-James) sitting on the beach with their dog
Series review

Terriers

2010 · Created by Ted Griffin · Series · 45m

In a sentenceTwo unlicensed detectives, one battered truck, and a great deal more sadness than the theme tune lets on

A beach town in southern California. Hank Dolworth (Donal Logue) runs an unlicensed private detective business out of a pickup truck with his friend Britt Pollack (Michael Raymond-James), taking the small, badly paid cases nobody else wants. Britt lives with Katie Nichols (Laura Allen), who knows less about his working day than she thinks. Hank’s ex-wife Gretchen (Kimberly Quinn) is about to marry somebody else, and Detective Mark Gustafson (Rockmond Dunbar) still takes his calls. A job for Mickey Gosney (Gareth Williams) looks like an afternoon’s work and turns into something with money behind it, and a man who does not want two skint detectives asking questions.

Fi1m review

Ted Griffin’s one-season series looks like a lark about two skint men in a pickup and turns out to be a proper noir about debt, drink and what a beach town lets a rich man get away with. Thirteen episodes, and very few of them are wasted.

Ted Griffin has made a private-eye series in which the private eyes have no licence, no office and no money. Hank Dolworth (Donal Logue) and Britt Pollack (Michael Raymond-James) take the jobs nobody else wants, in a beach town where everyone knows Hank and nobody quite trusts him, and they are paid, when they are paid, in cash and favours. For the first episode or two this looks like a pleasant hour about two men bickering in a truck. It is a good deal better than that, and the tagline, they’ll solve anything for the right price, is the show quietly making fun of itself.

The whole thing rests on Logue and Raymond-James, and it can take the weight. Logue plays Hank as a man who has read the end of his own story and is not in a hurry to get there: slow, dry, watchful, quick with a lie and slower with the truth. Raymond-James gives Britt a boy’s eagerness that keeps curdling into something more worried, and he is the one who wants the business to be real. They interrogate as a double act, one asking the question and the other already answering it, and the banter is written so that it sounds unrehearsed and tells you something about the case every time. We laughed a lot in the first hour, mostly at the two of them talking over each other, and then a scene of Hank alone at a kitchen table stopped the laugh dead. That is the show’s method, and it repeats it without ever quite letting us see it coming.

It is shot flat and bright, in the sort of noon light that shows the dirt on everything. Bungalows, chain-link, a pier, a bar that opens early, a truck that would not pass an inspection. There is no attempt to make any of it handsome, and the effect is that when a rich man’s house does appear it looks like a foreign country. The theme is a jaunty thing with guitar and whistling that promises a caper each week. By episode six we were slightly tired of it; by episode ten we understood it was a joke at Hank’s expense, and rather a sad one.

Tim Minear produces, and the writing room, which includes Shawn Ryan, Angela Kang, Leslye Headland and Phoef Sutton, keeps the two halves of the show in balance. Each week there is a small case, and running underneath is the larger business from the pilot, which grows in ways we will not describe. Clark Johnson, John Dahl, Adam Arkin and Rian Johnson are among the directors, and the series has the sense to let them shoot people talking in rooms rather than reaching for a set piece it cannot afford.

The supporting cast is written with more care than the format usually allows. Laura Allen’s Katie is a proper person with her own wants, not a girlfriend waiting at home, and Kimberly Quinn plays Gretchen as a woman who still likes Hank and has quite reasonably decided that is not enough. Jamie Denbo’s Maggie Lefferts gets some of the best lines. Rockmond Dunbar’s Gustafson watches Hank the way you watch a friend you have already given up on twice.

It has faults. Two or three of the middle episodes are thin, cases that exist to fill the hour while the larger story waits, and the man behind the conspiracy is a familiar sort of villain in a familiar sort of suit. The budget shows, and not always to the show’s advantage. And there is one season of thirteen episodes and no more, so a story built to keep going has to make do with the ending it was given.

Against the standard of the down-at-heel detective, The Rockford Files (1974) and Altman’s The Long Goodbye (1973), it holds up well: the same broke, decent men, the same suspicion that the rich are the real criminals and the police mostly agree. By the last two episodes we were properly anxious for two people who spend a good part of the series being irritating, and we had not expected to be. Give it three episodes. If the truck and the whistling have not won you by then, it is not for you, and if they have, you will be sorry there is only the one season.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

76
Positive
5
Mixed
0
Negative
0
The AV Club
12 April 2016 · Phil McCausland
90*

The critic calls Terriers a perfect one-season neo-noir series that defied easy description and marketability. He singles out its exploration of characters' interior lives through crime stories as a key strength ahead of its time.

Read the full review →
Vulture
8 October 2010
80*

The critic finds Terriers initially baffling as a standard procedural but discovers after a few episodes that it is actually smart noir with a dark conspiracy arc. They single out its serious treatment of characters' moral lives, the strong ensemble cast led by Donal Logue, and its California charm as reasons to watch.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
14 October 2010
70*

The show is not headed for greatness but makes the best of things with witty writing, light tone, satisfying tempo, and a well-drawn sense of place, driven by strong casting especially Donal Logue and good chemistry. It is a pleasing cops-and-robbers story that satisfies fans of the form without aiming for the heights of more ambitious series.

Read the full review →
Variety
4 September 2010 · Brian Lowry
70*

The series is an odd but mostly good buddy dramedy about small-time detectives, with a tone reminiscent of an independent film that drags viewers through nuanced twists despite a low-concept premise. It succeeds through atmosphere, breezy chemistry between leads, and a willingness to be messy and melancholy rather than high-stakes or flashy.

Read the full review →
Collider
7 September 2010 · Brendan Bettinger
70*

The review finds that Terriers keeps FX's strong 2010 streak of new series alive with a strong balance of procedural cases and an overarching conspiracy plot. It singles out the central friendship and banter between the two leads, along with the lead performances, for particular praise.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Terriers worth watching?
Terriers is worth watching for anyone who likes a private-eye story told slowly and with a sad streak, and we scored it 82. Donal Logue and Michael Raymond-James carry it as two skint, unlicensed detectives in a beach town, and the banter keeps turning into something more painful. Give it three episodes; two or three of the thirteen are thin.
How long is Terriers, and what is it rated?
Terriers has episodes of about 45m. It is a crime and drama series.
Where can I watch Terriers in Peru?
Terriers is not on any streaming or rental service in Peru at the moment. It is available in 4 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is Terriers, and is it suitable for children?
Terriers carries a TV-MA rating in the United States and has no UK certificate, which means adult language and adult subject matter throughout. It is a crime drama about debt, drink and a conspiracy with money behind it, and it is not made for children. Teenagers who can sit through a slow, talky noir will be fine; there is nothing here for the squeamish to fear beyond the mood.
How does Terriers compare to The Long Goodbye?
Terriers and The Long Goodbye share the same broke, decent detective and the same flat, unforgiving light, and we recommend them beside each other. Altman's film is the stranger and more melancholy piece, with a mystery that becomes harder to follow than it needs to be; the series is funnier and clearer, with a double act at its centre. Start with the film if you want Marlowe, the series if you want thirteen hours of two men in a truck.
What should I watch after Terriers?
After Terriers, try The Long Goodbye (1973, Fi1m 86): Altman lets Marlowe shuffle through Los Angeles in the same flat, unforgiving light. Then Cutter's Way (1981, Fi1m 82): Two damaged friends decide a rich man is guilty; nobody thanks them for it; and Justified (2010, Fi1m 87): Another small-town lawman series where the talk does most of the work.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Rockford Files (1974) · not reviewed yetThe original broke, decent detective in a trailer, paid late and punched often.

  2. The Long Goodbye (1973, Fi1m 86)Altman lets Marlowe shuffle through Los Angeles in the same flat, unforgiving light.

  3. Cutter's Way (1981, Fi1m 82)Two damaged friends decide a rich man is guilty; nobody thanks them for it.

  4. Justified (2010, Fi1m 87)Another small-town lawman series where the talk does most of the work.

  5. The Nice Guys (2016) · not reviewed yetShane Black’s mismatched pair blunder through a case with the same bruised comedy.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever