Series review

The Rockford Files

1974 · Created by Stephen J. Cannell, Roy Huggins · Series · 1h 00m · MPA TV-PG

In a sentenceWe would leave this detective a message even without a crime to report

CrimeDramaMystery

Jim Rockford (James Garner) is a private detective with other people’s mysteries to untangle and little appetite for playing the grand investigator. His callers are asked to leave their names and messages, with a promise that he will get back to them. Around him are Joseph ‘Rocky’ Rockford (Noah Beery Jr.), Dennis Becker (Joe Santos) and Angel Martin (Stuart Margolin). His cases unfold alongside his relationships with the people around him. Rockford meets the work with weary humour, rather than the solemnity his profession might seem to require.

Fi1m review

James Garner makes The Rockford Files easy to recommend: a detective series whose humour comes from people worth spending time with. Some mysteries are routine, but the company is consistently good.

We recommend The Rockford Files for James Garner, while accepting that some of the mysteries will need him more than others. Creators Stephen J. Cannell and Roy Huggins give him a part that depends on our enjoying Jim Rockford’s company without needing to be impressed by him. That is a sensible basis for an hour of crime television. A mystery can occupy the attention, but someone has to make us care about spending that hour in it.

The promise to get back to callers who leave a name and message is a useful introduction to the man. There is something reassuringly ordinary about it, and James Garner makes that ordinariness appealing without asking for our admiration. We warmed to him because his weary humour makes dealing with other people seem like enough work for any detective. The performance has room for irritation, but it rarely suggests that the people who cause it are beneath our attention.

The supporting performances matter because it would be tiring to spend every scene waiting for the lead to speak. Noah Beery Jr. gives Joseph ‘Rocky’ Rockford an appealing lack of fuss, while Joe Santos makes Dennis Becker feel solid enough to resist the lead’s charm. Stuart Margolin’s Angel Martin supplies a less restful presence, and the change of energy is welcome. James Garner leaves room for the others to establish themselves, so their contributions need not be confined to giving him information.

Lamar Boren’s cinematography is rightly content to let the actors be the main attraction. We do not need a detective to be made imposing by every image, and the straightforward photography suits a lead who does not swagger. Editors George R. Rohrs, Fred Baratta and Edward A. Biery give the storytelling a similarly useful clarity. The mysteries are easy to follow, and the humour does not feel as though it has been inserted between the important bits.

Artie Kane, Pete Carpenter and Mike Post supply music that understands how lightly this material needs to be handled. Its buoyancy helps stop Rockford’s weariness becoming oppressive, although the performance would scarcely allow that anyway. There is a risk that a knowing detective series will congratulate itself every time it notices a convention. Here the music and the actors usually keep that knowingness amiable, and the story is allowed to get on with its work.

The weakness is that an agreeable lead can conceal a merely serviceable mystery, and sometimes that is what happens here. James Garner can make the business of getting through a plot enjoyable without making the plot itself much more distinctive. The hour-long format also leaves room for stretches in which familiarity has to do too much of the work. We would not pretend that every case deserves the same attention, or that a fondness for Rockford makes the routine passages disappear.

Within the private-eye genre, the pleasure here is a capable man who is allowed to sound fed up with the work. His reluctance makes him approachable, and the humour gives us a reason to stay interested beyond finding out who did what. We would happily return for the conversations even if we had forgotten the particulars of a case. Try an episode for James Garner, and give the mystery a little leeway.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

3 of 6
Positive
3
Mixed
0
Negative
0
The Hollywood Reporter
25 August 2015 · THR Staff
90*

The Rockford Files is a terrific show done with style, wit and intelligence. James Garner is equally terrific in the part of Jim Rockford and it is his performance that is largely responsible for the success of this show.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
7 May 2012 · Emily St. James
70*

The critic praises the series for its fresh, self-aware take on the private-eye genre and James Garner's charming, sarcastic performance as the world-weary Jim Rockford. The show is highlighted as a critical success that influenced later TV through its mix of humor, realism, and efficient storytelling.

Read the full review →
Collider
3 December 2009 · Charles A. Coulombe
80*

The critic praises the revival TV movies for recapturing the spirit of the original series while successfully updating the franchise. They highlight how the films recreate the dynamic relationships among Rockford and his friends and succeed as standalone mysteries.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

If you liked this, try…

Columbo poster

Columbo

1971 · Another detective whose apparently unremarkable manner makes the people around him careless.

The Long Goodbye poster86

The Long Goodbye

1973 · A more bruised private eye, with the same suspicion of professional glamour.

Minder poster

Minder

1979 · For the friendship, the dodgy business and the complaints that keep both going.

The Thin Man poster

The Thin Man

1934 · A mystery sustained by actors whose company would justify a considerably weaker plot.

The Brokenwood Mysteries poster

The Brokenwood Mysteries

2014 · New Zealand investigations with room for eccentric neighbours and a less hurried detective.