Film review

1963 · Directed by Federico Fellini · 2h 19m · 15

In a sentenceEven a director’s nervous breakdown needs a costume designer

Drama

Guido Anselmi (Marcello Mastroianni) is a film director caught in a creative crisis. As he struggles with his work, his thoughts turn towards dreams, memories and the women from his past. His private concerns become inseparable from the task of making a film, with filmmaking itself becoming part of the story. Federico Fellini directs a cast that includes Anouk Aimée as Luisa Anselmi, Sandra Milo as Carla and Claudia Cardinale as Claudia. The drama moves through Guido’s inner life as he tries to make sense of his work and himself.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Federico Fellini’s is funny, unsettling and well worth its occasional demands on our patience. Marcello Mastroianni holds together a director’s wandering thoughts, though the film is sometimes too forgiving of his self-absorption.

A director unable to work is not, on its own, a promising subject for an evening’s entertainment. Federico Fellini’s is funny and absorbing because it gives us so much to watch while its central figure struggles to think. The comedy allows us to recognise the distress without having to receive every complaint in solemn silence. Marcello Mastroianni plays Guido Anselmi, whose creative crisis brings his memories and dreams into the business of making a film.

We enjoyed feeling lost during the opening dream. Fellini begins inside Guido’s confused thoughts, so we experience his anxiety before we can dismiss it as another artist’s complaint. A film about someone who cannot create anything could easily become a succession of conversations about how difficult creation is. Here, the shifts into dreams and memories keep giving us something to look at, and there is enough humour to stop the confusion becoming a chore.

Gianni Di Venanzo’s black-and-white photography makes the dream sequences feel substantial, with people worth looking at beyond the troubled man at their centre. The images reward attention even when the story is refusing to proceed in a straight line. Piero Gherardi’s costumes help distinguish the personalities rather than merely decorate the actors, while his production design gives the imagined scenes a convincing physical setting. Both contributions are important to the pleasure of spending so long inside Guido’s thoughts.

Leo Catozzo’s editing keeps the changes between work, memory and fantasy from becoming laborious. We are allowed to make connections without having each transition explained, and that gives the comedy room to move. Nino Rota’s score is important to the humour, keeping a sense of play in material that might otherwise ask for rather too much sympathy.

Mastroianni is a large part of why we keep following Guido. He makes the character’s self-absorption funny without smoothing away the irritation of being around someone who gives his own uncertainty so much attention. Anouk Aimée as Luisa Anselmi, Sandra Milo as Carla and Claudia Cardinale as Claudia bring welcome differences of temperament to the women in his life. Their performances encourage us to look beyond Guido’s account of himself, and to wonder how much of these people he actually notices.

That is also where our reservation lies. The screenplay by Fellini, Ennio Flaiano, Tullio Pinelli and Brunello Rondi understands the comedy of a man continually examining himself, but sometimes lets him continue after we have understood the joke. The women deserve more attention on their own terms, and acknowledging Guido’s self-indulgence does not make every instance of it interesting. This is a film about artistic difficulty that earns most of its freedom through humour and invention; a few passages still try our patience.

At 139 minutes, asks for a willingness to wander. Anyone looking for a plot that advances cleanly from one problem to the next should choose something else. We recommend giving it the evening, with enough attention to notice the jokes as well as the anguish. There is no need to share Guido’s profession, or his opinion of himself.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

4 of 6
Positive
3
Mixed
1
Negative
0
Empire
1 January 2012 · Steve Goldman
85*

The critic praises the film as one of Fellini's masterpieces and a powerful personal statement that continues to beguile despite being divisive. It singles out the sprawling portrait of the artist and the creative process in crisis.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
11 July 1963 · James Powers
70*

The film is a grim fable of modern man and a true art picture likely limited in general appeal but strong in art houses. It features penetrating and witty moments with strong performances, especially from Marcello Mastroianni, and excellent technical credits including editing and music.

Read the full review →
The Independent
28 March 1993
60*

The short review describes the film as post-modernism 1963-style about a director on the verge of a nervous breakdown. It notes that it is dated but fitfully arresting.

Read the full review →
Financial Times
30 April 2015 · Danny Leigh

The critic describes the digitally restored re-release as a glorious portrait of a grand director folding in on himself. It ranks among the greatest movies about movies.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
23 April 2010 · Kenneth Turan

Turan describes 8 1/2 as a timeless classic of personal cinema about self-portraiture and the creative process. He singles out its ability to enthrall through imagination and instinct.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
7 May 1993 · Roger Ebert

Ebert calls 8 1/2 a great film and the definitive work about director's block. He singles out its autobiographical elements and the famous harem daydream sequence for praise.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 1964

Nominated
Best Director
Nominated
Best Writing, Original Screenplay
Won
Best Costume Design, Black-and-White
Won
Best International Feature Film

International Submission to the Academy Awards, 1964

Nominated
International Submission to the Academy Awards

National Board of Review Award for Best Foreign Language Film, 1963

Won
National Board of Review Award for Best Foreign Language Film

If you liked this, try…

Wild Strawberries poster

Wild Strawberries

1957 · Dreams and memories trouble another man who would rather avoid examining himself.

Day for Night poster

Day for Night

1973 · Filmmaking turns into everyday farce, with affection for the people doing the work.

All That Jazz poster

All That Jazz

1979 · Another artist makes his failings into entertainment, with rather less mercy for himself.

The Souvenir poster

The Souvenir

2019 · An aspiring filmmaker learns how much her private life shapes what she sees.

Pain and Glory poster

Pain and Glory

2019 · A filmmaker revisits desire and memory, with more quiet and fewer distractions.