Film review

Apollo 11

2019 · Directed by Todd Douglas Miller · 1h 33m · MPA G

In a sentenceFifty years in a vault, and the 65mm launch still looks like it might not work

DocumentaryHistoryDrama

It is the morning of 16 July 1969 at the Kennedy Space Centre in Florida. Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin and Michael Collins are being helped into their suits while the Saturn V rocket stands on the pad, venting vapour into the dawn. Along the beaches and causeways, families have parked their cars overnight to watch. In the firing room, rows of men in short-sleeved shirts work through the countdown, and Walter Cronkite talks the nation through the wait. The three men mean to reach the moon, put two of them on it and bring all three home, and the first thing in their way is the launch itself. The film uses only footage and audio recorded at the time, with no narration and no interviews.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Todd Douglas Miller has assembled the moon landing from NASA’s own film and audio, with no narrator and no one looking back. The launch is as frightening a piece of cinema as we have seen in years; the quieter stretches in the capsule show where the archive runs thin.

Todd Douglas Miller has made a film about the first moon landing out of nothing but what was filmed and recorded at the time. There is no narrator, no historian in an armchair, no astronaut in his eighties remembering. The footage runs in order, from the crawler carrying the Saturn V to the pad through to the splashdown, and the only voices are the ones that spoke in July 1969. It is a simple idea and it is hard to do well. Miller does it well, and for the first half hour he does it as well as we have seen it done.

The reason is the film stock. A good deal of what we see was shot on 65mm by NASA’s own cameras and then left in storage for half a century, and it has come out looking as if it were shot last week. The crowds on the Florida beaches, with their station wagons and folding chairs and sunhats, are in colour so full that the 1960s stop looking like the past. A woman in a printed dress adjusts a pair of binoculars. A boy sleeps on the bonnet of a car. Miller, who is also his own editor, keeps cutting back to these people, and we came to see why: they are the only ones in the film as helpless as we are.

Then the rocket goes. Miller holds a countdown clock in the corner of the frame and lets the firing room, the pad and the beach share the screen, and Matt Morton’s score, played on synthesisers, climbs under it without once getting in the way of the voices. At ignition the camera is a few yards from the flame, ice falling from the tanks in slabs, and the picture shakes because the ground did. We held our breath, which is a stupid thing to do when you know how it ends, and we did not let it out until the first stage fell away. We have watched a great many launches on film. This one felt as if it might not work.

The middle of the film belongs to the crew, and here the archive is thinner. Once the men are in the capsule the footage is 16mm, shot by the astronauts themselves, and it is grainy, badly lit and often pointed at nothing much. Miller fills the gaps with plain line drawings of the spacecraft turning and separating, and with long stretches of mission audio over still or near-still images. This is honest, and some of it is lovely; Collins alone in the command module with the earth in the window is a picture we will keep. But it is also where we felt the running time, short as it is. For ten or fifteen minutes the film is a radio play with a slideshow.

The descent brings it back. Charles Duke’s voice from Houston, a computer alarm nobody expected, a fuel count read aloud in seconds, and Gene Kranz’s team at their consoles, smoking, not moving. Miller uses split screens so that we watch the men who cannot see what we are seeing. The landing footage is the footage everyone has seen, and it has never been shown this clearly; you can watch the dust go out flat under the engine instead of billowing, because there is no air for it to billow in.

What the film will not do is explain. It does not tell you who these men were, what the mission cost or what it was for, beyond a few seconds of John F. Kennedy at a podium. It trusts you to know, or not to mind. Most critics have counted that as a virtue and so, mostly, do we; the one dissenting review complains that Miller brings nothing to the material but a tidy order, and there are moments in the capsule when that is a fair description. He has chosen to be a window rather than a guide, and a window is only as good as what is on the other side of it.

See it on the largest screen you can, with the sound turned up; the launch does not survive a laptop speaker. Certificate U, 93 minutes, and the people in the parked cars steal it.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

84
Positive
20
Mixed
0
Negative
1
Radio Times
★★★★★ · Jamie Healy
100

The critic commends the film's use of restored footage and sourced audio to present the mission with unprecedented clarity and epic scale. It notes the awe-inspiring visuals of the launch and lunar surface while acknowledging minor quibbles with editing choices.

Read the full review →
The Times
28 June 2019 · ★★★★★ · Kevin Maher
100

The never-before-seen 70mm footage and synchronised audio produce one of the finest documentaries of the year. It marries spectacular imagery with mission audio to deliver a detailed, deadpan account of a remarkable human achievement.

Read the full review →
Time Out
27 January 2019 · Joshua Rothkopf
95*

The critic calls it the most perfect movie about its subject, lauding the pure documentary approach using only archival footage. It highlights the emotional power of showing the collective human effort behind the mission.

Read the full review →
Empire
24 June 2019 · Ian Freer
90*

The critic praises Miller’s enthralling documentary, assembled from pristine 65mm footage and audio, as immersive and gripping. They single out its thoughtful approach that lets the images convey the emotional experience of the mission and celebrates values of science and ingenuity.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
25 January 2019 · festival review · David Ehrlich
90*

The review highlights the compilation of never-before-seen NASA footage into a staggeringly clear look at the moon mission, calling it an astonishing documentary and one giant leap for film restoration.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
27 February 2019 · A- · Noel Murray
90

The critic praises the film as astonishing and immersive, noting how it uses rare, pristine footage to convey the sheer scale of the NASA operation and lets original 1969 audio and images tell the story without new narration or interviews.

Read the full review →

Cast

Awards

Sundance Special Jury Prize Documentary, 2019

Won
Sundance Special Jury Prize Documentary

If you liked this, try…

For All Mankind poster

For All Mankind

1989 · The Apollo programme cut from NASA film with the astronauts’ own voices; the earlier, dreamier version of this idea.

The Right Stuff poster86

The Right Stuff

1983 · The Mercury astronauts as swaggering test pilots, three hours long and never dull.

Senna poster84

Senna

2010 · Another life told entirely in archive, with no talking heads and a great deal of engine noise.

First Man poster

First Man

2018 · Armstrong as a drama, shot from inside the capsule, so you feel every rivet shake.

Fire of Love poster

Fire of Love

2022 · Two volcanologists’ own 16mm footage, cut into something stranger and sadder than a nature film.