Bridget Jones (Renée Zellweger) is carried above a cheering crowd at a music festival
Film review

Bridget Jones's Baby

2016 · Directed by Sharon Maguire · 2h 03m · IFCO 15A

In a sentenceTwo possible fathers, and we would still rather spend the evening with Emma Thompson

Bridget (Renée Zellweger) is more comfortable with herself, but her love life remains unsettled. When she becomes pregnant, she cannot be sure who the father is: Mark (Colin Firth) and Jack (Patrick Dempsey) are both possibilities. She wants to work out what motherhood will mean for her while sorting out where each man belongs in her life. Her journalism career brings its own complications, including mishaps on live news, as she tries to manage a pregnancy without a clear answer about paternity.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Bridget Jones’s Baby is a funny, affectionate romantic comedy stretched beyond its story’s needs. Renée Zellweger and Emma Thompson make it worth the extra patience, though the two-man dilemma grows repetitive.

Sharon Maguire’s Bridget Jones’s Baby gets the important thing right: Bridget remains someone whose company we enjoy. The pregnancy and uncertain paternity supply enough complications for a romantic comedy, though not quite enough for 123 minutes. We recommend it to anyone who likes the genre and can forgive a familiar story taking its time. Its chief pleasure is watching Renée Zellweger play a woman who has become more at ease with herself without becoming immune to embarrassment.

That change matters. Renée Zellweger allows Bridget some confidence, which makes the vulnerable moments easier to believe; she no longer seems to need our reassurance before every laugh. The live-news mishaps still put her professional dignity at risk, and the timing makes them funny even when the writing appears too eager to humiliate her. We laughed, then wished the film would give her working life a little more respect. The comedy is good enough to survive without quite so much embarrassment being piled on the same woman.

Colin Firth gives Mark enough feeling to make his comic timing count for something beyond the next joke. We can believe that these people matter to each other, even while the screenplay arranges another complication between them. Patrick Dempsey is less fortunate as Jack: the part supplies a romantic alternative without offering him equally interesting things to play. He does what he can, but the imbalance makes the uncertainty about the father less rewarding as an extended source of romantic suspense.

Emma Thompson gets more out of less as Dr Rawlings. Her restrained delivery lets a joke register without the film having to stop and admire it, and we were grateful for that calm whenever the surrounding business became busy. She also shares the screenplay credit with Helen Fielding and Dan Mazer; there is no need to guess which writer supplied which laugh. Sarah Solemani brings welcome comic assurance to Miranda, helping an ensemble that can make familiar material seem freshly amusing.

Andrew Dunn’s cinematography and John Paul Kelly’s production design give Bridget a comfortable-looking world, perhaps a little too comfortable for the film’s attempts to keep her recognisably ordinary. The polish makes some of the mishaps feel safely arranged. Craig Armstrong’s music has to share attention with a persistent procession of pop songs, whose eagerness to establish a mood grows tiring. The performers generally tell us enough about how a scene feels without another song helping.

Melanie Oliver’s editing serves the individual comic exchanges better than the longer romantic business. Once the central dilemma is established, there is too much time spent sustaining it, and the script seldom makes repetition feel like a new development. Even by the forgiving standards of a romantic comedy, the uncertainty becomes hard to sustain when one prospective partner has so much less to do. A shorter running time would have helped the jokes as well as the romance.

Still, Sharon Maguire gives her cast room to be likeable without asking us to applaud every imperfection. The affection for Bridget is persuasive, and Renée Zellweger makes her increasing self-acceptance worth returning to. For an evening of romantic comedy, the cast is worth a little patience.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

63
Positive
9
Mixed
11
Negative
4

The reviews lean towards a qualified welcome for Bridget Jones’s Baby, with praise clustering around Renée Zellweger’s warmth, vulnerability and comic timing. Many critics find that a more mature, comfortable Bridget gives the sequel a reason to exist beyond familiarity. Emma Thompson’s performance is another recurring pleasure, while several reviews credit the ensemble and physical comedy with keeping the laughs coming despite a thin story. Even some sceptical notices find the leads worth watching.

The spread is wide, however, from enthusiastic approval to outright disappointment. Reservations centre on the stretched plot, familiar romantic-comedy conventions and uneven characterisation. Critics also disagree about Bridget herself: some welcome her growth, while Digital Spy argues that she has become aspirational rather than relatable. The Evening Standard notably faults Zellweger while praising Colin Firth. At the harsher end, Slant Magazine objects to the shallow romantic setup and relentless pop songs.

Empire
6 September 2016 · Terri White
85*

The review finds the film warm, witty and more than a match for the original, despite occasional credibility gaps. It especially praises the chemistry between Renée Zellweger and returning director Sharon Maguire, and Emma Thompson’s scene-stealing performance.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
15 September 2016 · Katie Walsh
85*

Walsh finds the third installment warmly satisfying and says Bridget’s growth makes it feel current rather than recycled. She particularly praises Renée Zellweger’s charming performance and the film’s embrace of Bridget as desirable and comfortable in her own skin.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
10 September 2016 · 3/4/3 · Adam Woodward
80

The critic finds the sequel agreeably optimistic, faithful to its characters and very funny, though conventional. He praises Bridget’s relatable acceptance of her flaws and consistency over time.

Read the full review →
Time Out
8 September 2016 · ★★★★ · Cath Clarke
80

The review says the third film is genuinely funny and benefits from a more content, wiser Bridget. It singles out Renée Zellweger’s return as part of what makes this installment work.

Read the full review →
Total Film
5 September 2016 · ★★★★ · Jane Crowther
80

Crowther finds it a warm, witty and welcome return that updates Bridget without losing her appeal. She especially praises Emma Thompson’s script polish and the film’s sharp, relevant comedy, though she faults its overly traditional ending.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
5 September 2016 · Stella Papamichael
70*

The review describes the comedy sequel as one that delivers. It singles out Zellweger’s heroine’s pregnancy and uncertainty about the father.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Bridget Jones's Baby worth watching?
Bridget Jones's Baby is worth watching for romantic-comedy fans who can forgive some repetition, and we score it 71 out of 100. Renée Zellweger makes Bridget warm and believable, while Emma Thompson supplies welcome dry humour. The uncertain-paternity story stretches too thin across 123 minutes, but we find the cast worth the patience.
How long is Bridget Jones's Baby, and what is it rated?
Bridget Jones's Baby runs 2h 03m and is rated 15A by the IFCO in Ireland. It is a drama and comedy film.
Where can I watch Bridget Jones's Baby in Ireland?
Bridget Jones's Baby is streaming on Amazon Prime Video in Ireland, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from €3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Bridget Jones's Baby, and is it suitable for children?
Bridget Jones's Baby carries a UK 15 certificate, so it is not suitable for children under 15. The classification signals adult material; the pregnancy and uncertain-paternity premise also points towards an older audience. Our review discusses embarrassment and romantic complications rather than violence or scares, but does not establish specific content warnings for either.
How does Bridget Jones's Baby compare to The Lunchbox?
Bridget Jones's Baby is the better choice for broad laughs and affectionate ensemble comedy; The Lunchbox better suits an evening of quiet romance. We enjoy Zellweger and Thompson despite the repetitive romantic dilemma, while Irrfan Khan's restraint makes The Lunchbox tender and persuasive. Neither entirely escapes overcareful handling: Bridget's story runs long, and the quieter film sometimes holds back too much.

Cast

Awards

European Film Award – People's Choice Award for Best European Film, 2017

Nominated
European Film Award – People's Choice Award for Best European Film

If you liked this, try…

  1. Enough Said (2013) · not reviewed yetAdult embarrassment and romantic nerves, handled by performers who know when to pause.

  2. Baby Boom (1987) · not reviewed yetAnother working woman’s plans are disrupted by motherhood, with room for practical complications.

  3. Man Up (2015) · not reviewed yetBritish romantic confusion, helped along by two leads worth spending an evening with.

  4. The Lunchbox (2013, Fi1m 75)A quieter romance about the possibility of changing a life that seems settled.

  5. I'm Your Man (2021) · not reviewed yetAn unusual suitor tests a woman’s ideas about what she actually wants.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever