A chorus line forms a geometric pattern across the stage under spotlights
Film review

Footlight Parade

1933 · Directed by Lloyd Bacon · 1h 44m

In a sentenceThe water ballet is worth waiting for, though the plot seems determined to check how much waiting we will tolerate

Chester Kent (James Cagney), Nan (Joan Blondell), Bea (Ruby Keeler) and Scotty (Dick Powell) are the principal characters in Footlight Parade, a musical comedy from 1933. Around them are Francis (Frank McHugh), Gould (Guy Kibbee), Mrs. Gould (Ruth Donnelly) and Vivian (Claire Dodd). Lloyd Bacon directs the 104-minute film, with a screenplay by James Seymour and Manuel Seff. Music is credited to Al Dubin, Sammy Fain, Irving Kahal and Harry Warren; George Barnes handles the cinematography and George Amy the editing.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

James Cagney and Joan Blondell are good company in Footlight Parade, though its first hour drags. The musical numbers earn a qualified recommendation, chiefly for anyone who will forgive loose plotting in exchange for a water ballet.

Footlight Parade is worth seeing for its musical numbers, provided a slack opening hour will not finish the evening for us. Lloyd Bacon takes longer than he should to make good on the film’s promise, and the wait is not consistently entertaining. We would forgive a thin story more readily if it moved briskly. Here, the comedy and the music keep offering different reasons to stay, with the music making the stronger case by some distance.

James Cagney, as Chester Kent, is the most persuasive reason to remain interested before the numbers take over. There is an alertness to his presence that makes even unpromising business feel briefly as though it might lead somewhere. Joan Blondell’s Nan supplies a welcome dryness beside him, without making the comedy feel laboured. The pair give us people to watch through a story that too often seems to be finding fresh ways to delay its own pleasures.

The screenplay by James Seymour and Manuel Seff has trouble making one passage matter to the next. A crowded cast can give a comedy momentum, but here it too often gives it another place to wander. George Amy’s editing leaves those joins exposed, and the first hour feels both busy and slow. That is a substantial reservation in a film running 104 minutes, with performers asked to keep us amused for too long without enough help from the writing.

We were delighted by the water ballet, partly because it gave us something specific and absorbing to watch after so much aimless plotting. The pleasure is in watching a musical number take its visual possibilities seriously, with movement worth attending to for its own sake. George Barnes’s photography deserves attention here: the spectacle remains readable, so we can enjoy its scale without losing interest in the performers. For once, we stopped wondering how long the film was taking.

The music credits name Al Dubin, Sammy Fain, Irving Kahal and Harry Warren, and the songs make a better case for the film than the dialogue. Honeymoon Hotel and Shanghai Lil have a distinct identity that much of the surrounding comedy lacks. We remember the numbers individually, and would happily watch them again without needing the connecting scenes to prepare us. Their independence helps: there is no need to find the plotting compelling before enjoying what the musical performers can do.

Musical comedy allows a certain amount of loose plotting, and we are happy to grant it. This much dead time is harder to overlook, particularly at 104 minutes. Our recommendation rests on the numbers, which are the reason we would return. Anyone coming principally for a tightly worked comedy may reasonably be less forgiving. Choose it for a musical evening, with patience for the stretches when nobody is singing.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

2 of 6
Positive
0
Mixed
2
Negative
0
Variety
31 December 1932 · Variety Staff
65*

The review finds the film weaker overall than its predecessors, but says its spectacular musical numbers more than compensate. It singles out the water ballet, “Honeymoon Hotel” and “Shanghai Lil” for praise, while criticizing the first hour’s lethargic, disjointed plot.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TM
64*

The page is identified as a review of the specified film, but the review text is unavailable. Its verdict and any particular praise or complaint cannot be determined from the accessible information.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Footlight Parade worth watching?
Footlight Parade is worth watching for its musical numbers, especially the water ballet, and we score it 70 out of 100. James Cagney and Joan Blondell help sustain interest through a slack opening hour, but we recommend it chiefly to musical fans willing to forgive loose plotting and a long wait for its strongest pleasures.
How long is Footlight Parade, and what is it rated?
Footlight Parade runs 1h 44m. It is a comedy and music film.
Where can I watch Footlight Parade in Vietnam?
Footlight Parade is not on any streaming or rental service in Vietnam at the moment. It is available in 14 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How does Footlight Parade compare to Topsy-Turvy?
Footlight Parade offers more pleasure in its musical numbers than its connecting story, while Topsy-Turvy makes the preparation of a show absorbing in its own right. We recommend Topsy-Turvy more confidently for its attention to the people doing the work, despite occasional slow stretches; Footlight Parade suits an evening when the spectacle matters more than the plotting.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Band Wagon (1953) · not on Fi1m yetBackstage egos and musical invention, with more confidence in the connecting comedy.

  2. The Young Girls of Rochefort (1967) · not on Fi1m yetA town full of dancers offers colour, romance and unapologetically expansive musical staging.

  3. The Boy Friend (1971) · not on Fi1m yetAnother backstage musical that lets elaborate numbers outgrow the business surrounding them.

  4. Topsy-Turvy (1999, Fi1m 88)For the rehearsal-room work behind a show, and the people doing it.

  5. The Hole (1998) · not on Fi1m yetMusical daydreams interrupt a leaking flat and a much lonelier kind of life.