Alex, Marty, Melman, and Gloria stand together on a tropical beach framed by broad leaves
Film review

Madagascar

2005 · Directed by Eric Darnell, Tom McGrath · 1h 26m

In a sentenceA zoo full of famous voices, and the penguins get the laughs

New York’s zoo is home to Alex (Ben Stiller), Marty (Chris Rock), Melman (David Schwimmer) and Gloria (Jada Pinkett Smith). The wild is somewhere else, far from the city and the surroundings they know. A departure from the zoo brings the animals into New York, where a tranquilliser dart adds to the disruption. Before long, the four residents are being shipped away from home. These are animals raised in a zoo, not born in the wild, and the journey puts them up against a life for which their familiar routines have offered little preparation.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Eric Darnell and Tom McGrath’s Madagascar offers enough visual mischief for an undemanding family evening. The penguins are worth waiting for, though the thin story makes even 86 minutes feel longer than necessary.

Eric Darnell and Tom McGrath build Madagascar around zoo animals being shipped into the wild, a situation that ought to keep a comedy well supplied. There is plenty to enjoy in its exaggerated movement and the supporting animals’ antics. The main story, however, is surprisingly short of things worth following, and the central quartet rarely gets the funniest material. At 86 minutes, it is a decent family diversion that still finds time to dawdle.

The early New York zoo scenes have a bustle that the rest of the film struggles to sustain. Production designer Kendal Cronkhite gives the film a bright, angular look, with characters whose shapes are funny before they do anything. These computer-animated animals look pleasingly drawn, and their exaggerated proportions suit the physical comedy. There is something to enjoy in the way they move even when the joke itself is weak, which happens often enough for that to matter.

Ben Stiller voices Alex, Chris Rock voices Marty, David Schwimmer voices Melman and Jada Pinkett Smith voices Gloria. They give the central quartet plenty of vocal energy, but too often a recognisable delivery has to do the job of a properly shaped joke. We wanted more for these characters than a succession of mishaps, especially when the film asks us to take their predicament seriously. The performers keep things companionable; the writing seldom gives them anything particularly surprising to say.

We laughed at the tranquilliser-dart sequence, where the effects of the drug become an excuse to distort the image. It is a more inventive joke than much of the slapstick surrounding it, and a welcome opportunity for the animators to take charge. The penguins and lemurs also benefit from being allowed to get on with being ridiculous, without carrying the central story. Sacha Baron Cohen voices King Julien, and his performance supplies some of the comic oddity missing from the principal quartet.

Editors H. Lee Peterson, Mark A. Hester and Clare Knight keep the individual comic bursts reasonably nimble, although the later stretches drag. The film can be busy without seeming to get anywhere, and its short running time does not prevent that from becoming tiring. Hans Zimmer’s score helps keep the mood buoyant without making the thinly written relationships much more engaging. The musical passages provide welcome changes of pace, and we would happily have traded some of the less inspired slapstick for more of them.

The screenplay is credited to Tom McGrath, Eric Darnell, Billy Frolick and Mark Burton, and its chief weakness is how little the central situation develops. A family comedy need not teach anybody a lesson, but it does need fresh things for its characters to do. The early zoo business benefits from having a particular place and way of life to play against. Later, too many of the jokes feel as though they could be moved into another cartoon without much alteration.

There is enough visual invention here to keep the evening agreeable, provided expectations remain modest. The broad shapes and loose comic movement offer pleasures that the dialogue does not always supply. Children who enjoy animal slapstick have a better chance of getting their evening’s worth than adults hoping for equally sharp verbal comedy. Choose it for that audience, and accept that the penguins will be missed whenever they leave the screen.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

55
Positive
1
Mixed
7
Negative
2

Most critics find Madagascar serviceable family entertainment, with more enthusiasm for its animation and supporting animals than for its story. Praise centres on the bright, angular look, visual inventiveness and lively early scenes in New York. The penguins and lemurs repeatedly emerge as comic assets, while several reviews suggest children are better served than adults looking for sharper humour. Screen Daily is more warmly disposed, finding enough amusement for parents alongside the slapstick aimed at children.

Reservations cluster around a premise that promises more than the film delivers, muddled plotting and momentum that falters as it goes along. The humour divides critics: some enjoy the mishaps and musical moments, while others find the jokes tired or insufficiently distinctive. Most verdicts sit in mixed territory, though the harsher responses expose a meaningful spread. Eye for Film particularly faults the lead characters, finding relief chiefly in the animation and the lemurs.

Screen Daily
23 May 2005 · John Hazelton
70*

Hazelton finds the film entertaining for children and amusing enough for parents. He singles out its eye-catching look, drawing on Tex Avery slapstick and Henri Rousseau-inspired imagery.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic's verdict is unavailable. No praise or complaint can be verified from the supplied text.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
24 May 2005 · ★★½/4 · Nick Schager
62

Schager finds the film a modest improvement over earlier DreamWorks animation but says it lacks Pixar’s blend of humor and poignancy. He praises its bright, angular aesthetic and lively depiction of New York City.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
60*

Thomas finds the film amiable and spirited but says it falls short of its premise and the standard set by Shrek. He praises its visual inventiveness, musical moments and memorable penguins, while faulting its slapstick and stalled storytelling.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Gareth Moses
60

The critic calls it serviceable family entertainment, though not on a par with Shrek. They praise its engaging mishaps but say the pace drags in the final third.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
9 December 2005 · C · Rob Mackie
57

Mackie finds the film colourful and enjoyable but muddled and not especially memorable. He praises the early zoo scenes and the imaginative effects of a tranquilliser dart, while criticizing the convoluted plot and a tired parody.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Madagascar worth watching?
Madagascar is a decent choice for children who enjoy animal slapstick, though its thin story limits our score to 60 out of 100. We find enough pleasure in the angular animation, penguins and lemurs for an undemanding family evening, but adults hoping for sharp dialogue may find even its 86 minutes drag.
How long is Madagascar, and what is it rated?
Madagascar runs 1h 26m. It is an adventure and animation film.
Where can I watch Madagascar in Estonia?
Madagascar is not on any streaming or rental service in Estonia at the moment. It is available in 49 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How does Madagascar compare to Chicken Run?
Madagascar offers broad animal slapstick, but we recommend Chicken Run more warmly for its tighter jokes and characters worth caring about. Both involve animals leaving confinement, though Chicken Run makes more of its escape plans; Madagascar is better suited to children chiefly interested in exaggerated movement and silly supporting animals.
What should I watch after Madagascar?
After Madagascar, try Chicken Run (2000, Fi1m 84): More animal escape plans, with tighter jokes and a proper reason to care. Then The Emperor's New Groove (2000, Fi1m 80): A vain animal lead gets sharper dialogue and far more disciplined comic timing; and The Jungle Book (1967, Fi1m 80): Animal personalities and musical comedy given more room to settle into a story.

Cast

Awards

Annie Award for Best Animated Feature, 2005

Nominated
Annie Award for Best Animated Feature

Critics' Choice Awards, 2005

Nominated
Best Animated Feature

If you liked this, try…

  1. Chicken Run (2000, Fi1m 84)More animal escape plans, with tighter jokes and a proper reason to care.

  2. A Town Called Panic (2009) · not reviewed yetPlastic animals cause escalating trouble in a comedy with no interest in behaving.

  3. The Emperor's New Groove (2000, Fi1m 80)A vain animal lead gets sharper dialogue and far more disciplined comic timing.

  4. The Jungle Book (1967, Fi1m 80)Animal personalities and musical comedy given more room to settle into a story.

  5. Ernest & Celestine (2012, Fi1m 84)A gentler animal friendship, with expressive drawings and room for quieter feelings.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever