Film review

Scream

1996 · Directed by Wes Craven · 1h 52m · MPA R

In a sentenceTeenagers discuss horror films with the confidence of people who have never been in one

CrimeHorrorMystery

Sidney (Neve Campbell) and her fellow teenagers are in danger, and their knowledge of horror films supplies plenty of theories about what might happen next. They compare their predicament to the slashers they have seen, discussing the rules even as their own lives begin to resemble the stories on screen. Billy (Skeet Ulrich), Tatum (Rose McGowan), Stuart (Matthew Lillard) and Randy (Jamie Kennedy) are among the young people caught up in the mystery. Wes Craven directs Kevin Williamson’s screenplay, with David Arquette as Deputy Dewey, Courteney Cox as Gale Weathers and Drew Barrymore as Casey.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Wes Craven makes Kevin Williamson’s knowing slasher funny without letting the danger become a joke. The cast earns our concern, though the script occasionally delays the fright while it explains how horror works.

Scream is a sharp, frightening slasher that occasionally spends too long admiring its own jokes. Wes Craven directs Kevin Williamson’s screenplay with enough respect for the danger to make the comedy feel risky. The teenagers know the conventions of horror films and discuss them while finding themselves in familiar trouble. That gives Craven two jobs: keep us amused by what these characters recognise, then make us fear for people who can explain exactly what they are afraid of.

We were frightened by the opening. Roger L. Jackson’s phone voice makes the threat feel uncomfortably close, and Craven allows that unease to persist when the teenagers begin comparing their predicament to other slashers. Their familiarity with horror sounds inadequate to what is happening to them. A reference can get a laugh without persuading us that anyone is safe, and Craven is careful about how much relief each joke provides. The performers have to make the fear convincing for those changes of tone to work.

Neve Campbell plays Sidney with a seriousness that gives the film someone worth worrying about. Her performance steadies the surrounding cleverness without seeming to belong to a different picture. Matthew Lillard’s Stuart supplies the unrulier energy; his comic excess is enjoyable, though there are moments when we would welcome less of it. Rose McGowan’s Tatum and Jamie Kennedy’s Randy help make the younger ensemble feel quick enough to keep up with Williamson’s writing. The dialogue needs actors who can enjoy a joke without pausing to congratulate themselves, and this cast mostly obliges.

Mark Irwin’s cinematography gives the film a polished finish that suits its confident, talkative teenagers. The images never make the horror look like something we are merely being invited to mock, which helps when Craven needs the threat taken seriously. Editor Patrick Lussier handles the switches between joking and alarm with more assurance than the longer stretches of knowing dialogue. The immediate changes of mood work; the pace is less secure when another reference keeps a scene talking after we have understood the point.

Marco Beltrami’s music helps the frightening passages hold their seriousness without signalling that we should be enjoying an elaborate joke. At its most insistent, it can also do a little too much of the worrying for us. Bruce Alan Miller’s production design supports the recognisable teenage setting without demanding attention away from the performers. His contribution matters because these characters need to seem comfortable in their surroundings for the danger to feel like an intrusion.

The reservation is Williamson’s eagerness to explain how well he understands the genre. Some exchanges linger over conventions that the audience has already recognised, and the pleasure of recognition begins to wear thin. The jokes can also give us a comfortable distance from the people being threatened, particularly when they sound like commentary on the screenplay. For a film so alert to the habits of slashers, it is occasionally too pleased to point out a familiar device and then use it anyway.

Still, Craven understands something that knowing horror comedies often forget: a frightened audience need not stop finding things funny. He keeps enough uncertainty in the tone for the laughs to feel welcome, and Campbell gives us a reason to care when the clever talk stops. The result rewards familiarity with slashers without requiring a full education in them. Choose it for a horror evening with company, but do not mistake the jokes for a promise of gentle treatment.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

4 of 6
Positive
4
Mixed
0
Negative
0
Radio Times
★★★★★ · Josh Winning
100

The review calls Scream an exceptional, trendsetting modern classic that updates genre conventions with razor-sharp dialogue and a fresh take. It singles out the bone-chilling opening and Craven's elegant direction of the smart script.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Adam Smith
90*

The film turns the slasher genre into a chaotic post-modern pyjama party with imperilled teens remarking on similarities to other slashers while following the rules. Craven leaps deftly from exuberant in-jokery to moments of terror.

Read the full review →
Total Film
2 May 1997 · Total Film
85*

Scream is a simultaneously frightening and witty film that affectionately tributes teen slasher films with shrewd self-referential gags that make the scary bits scarier. The cheapster cast are better than they have any right to be.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 May 1997 · Kim Newman

The review praises Scream as a witty, self-aware post-modern slasher that rigorously dissects genre conventions while delivering scares and laughs. It singles out the clever in-jokes, strong junior cast and Craven's skill at balancing parody with genuine tension.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
20 December 1996 · Janet Maslin

The critic finds the film an uneasy mix of parody and exploitation that winks at horror tropes while still delivering lurid thrills. It singles out the self-aware characters who quote other slasher films for both its cleverness and its cynicism.

Read the full review →
Time Out
28 April 2016 · TCh

The review commends Craven and Williamson for killing off clichés with panache in this post-modern horror comedy. It highlights the intelligence, wit and strong young cast as making it a standout scary movie.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

If you liked this, try…

Peeping Tom poster

Peeping Tom

1960 · A horror film that makes our appetite for watching feel unpleasantly relevant.

Black Christmas poster

Black Christmas

1974 · For the unease beneath the banter, and danger within familiar domestic spaces.

Perfect Blue poster82

Perfect Blue

1997 · An animated thriller that makes watching and being watched increasingly difficult to separate.

The Faculty poster

The Faculty

1998 · More teenagers scrutinise one another while horror makes ordinary adolescent suspicion reasonable.

One Cut of the Dead poster

One Cut of the Dead

2017 · Another horror comedy whose pleasures depend on knowing less before starting.