A masked figure in a black robe stands in a dimly lit hallway
Film review

Scream 7

2026 · Directed by Kevin Williamson · 1h 54m · CCC 14

In a sentenceThe killer has seen every horror film ever made; the victims, seven entries in, still have not

Sidney (Neve Campbell) has a new surname, a husband, Mark (Joel McHale), and a daughter, Tatum (Isabel May), who has grown up knowing what her mother survived. Then a phone rings, the Voice (Roger L. Jackson) is on the other end, and someone in a mask begins killing people who know the family. Gale Weathers (Courteney Cox) comes back, as do Mindy and Chad Meeks-Martin (Jasmin Savoy Brown, Mason Gooding), the twins who kept the last two films’ scorecards. Around Tatum is a set of friends and neighbours (Anna Camp, Celeste O’Connor, Sam Rechner, Asa Germann, Mckenna Grace), any of whom might be holding the knife. Kevin Williamson, who wrote the first film, directs for the first time.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Kevin Williamson directs his own script at last, Neve Campbell is back and on form, and the film around them is the least sharp the series has produced. Competent murders in the dark, suspects you will spot from the sofa. For the faithful, and only just.

Kevin Williamson wrote Scream in 1996 and Wes Craven directed it, and the joke of that film was that its characters had seen the same horror films as the audience. Thirty years on Williamson is directing for the first time, from a script he wrote with Guy Busick, on a story by Busick and James Vanderbilt. Sidney (Neve Campbell) is Sidney Evans now, with a husband, Mark (Joel McHale), a daughter, Tatum (Isabel May), and a life that has been quiet for long enough to be suspicious. The phone rings, as it must. It is watchable, it is not stupid, and it is the first entry in the series with almost nothing to say about horror films.

The opening states the problem. It is a long prologue about the rules of the genre and the rules of this series, and it goes on well past the point where the rules are established. The 1996 film did this in three minutes because nobody had done it before. Here the routine runs and runs, and by its end we were already checking how much of the 114 minutes remained.

Campbell is the reason the film is not worse. She plays Sidney as a woman who has been managing fear for so long that it has become a set of habits, checking doors, choosing where to sit, and Williamson gives her room to do it without a speech. When Courteney Cox arrives as Gale Weathers the film briefly has a pulse. Thirty years of playing these parts has given them a shorthand, and every scene they share is better played than the scenes around it. We were gladder to see them than we expected to be, and we noticed that the gladness was doing work the script should have done.

The murders are the trouble. Tim Ives and Ramsey Nickell shoot most of them at night in a murk that hides the layout of each house, so that we often could not tell which door the mask had come through, and a stalking scene where you cannot read the space is not frightening, only noisy. Jim Page cuts them to a similar shape each time, approach, lunge, escape, so that the fourth plays like the second. We were bored by the halfway mark, and then we were cross about being bored, because these are the scenes the series exists for.

The younger cast are given costumes and a grudge each and not much more. Anna Camp, Celeste O’Connor, Sam Rechner, Asa Germann and Mckenna Grace stand around Tatum as a ring of suspects, and the film points at them so evenly that two announce themselves early. Isabel May is fine, and stuck; the script wants Tatum to be the new Sidney and keeps handing the interesting decisions to the old one. Jasmin Savoy Brown and Mason Gooding, so good in the two previous films, are here mostly to remind us of them.

Marco Beltrami, who scored the original, returns with a score that leans on his old themes, and John Collins’s production design and Leigh Leverett’s costumes keep everything in the flat suburban key of 1996. This is a return to the first film’s ground, made by the man who drew the map. What it lacks is the thing that made the first film matter, a point of view about the genre it was standing in. Roger L. Jackson’s Voice still asks its questions down the line. Nobody in this film has an answer he has not heard.

Most critics have landed roughly where we have, divided between the mildly entertained and the fed up. Against the series’ own best, the first film and the last two, this is the entry with the least on its mind. Against the run of ordinary slasher sequels it is tidy and acted by grown-ups.

See it if you have seen the other six and would feel odd stopping now; the 18 certificate is honestly earned and Campbell will not let you down. Everyone else can wait, except for the surprise of the suspects, which the film has already given away.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

46
Positive
0
Mixed
4
Negative
4

The reviews for Scream 7 land between lukewarm and hostile, and nobody is prepared to call it a success. The praise clusters almost entirely around one thing: Neve Campbell’s return as Sidney Prescott, which most critics find lively and well judged, with several enjoying her scenes alongside Courteney Cox. A handful of the kills are called inventive, and Kevin Williamson, directing for the first time, gets occasional credit for a clever framing choice.

The reservations are consistent and settle on the script: the meta wit that defined the series is thinner, the suspects are obvious, the reveals feel arbitrary, and the younger cast leave little impression. The spread is fairly narrow, running from grudging three-star notices to one-star dismissals. The Telegraph and Collider both call it the worst film in the series. Deadline and Radio Times are the warmest, finding a crowd-pleaser executed with some zest. Nobody thinks it is as sharp as the original.

Radio Times
26 February 2026 · ★★★ · Terry Staunton
60

The critic finds faults, plot holes and a dubious ending but praises the film as a crowd-pleaser executed with zest. Williamson's direction and the return of Neve Campbell as Sidney are singled out for adding style, wit and self-referential fun to the formula.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
26 February 2026 · Manohla Dargis
60*

The mix of yuks and yucks isn’t as tasty as before, but after 30 years the unkillable series hasn’t entirely bled out. It revisits the franchise’s greatest hits with a reunion cast including Williamson’s directorial debut, but features an overlong meta opener and disposable characters who ignore horror-movie rules.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
26 February 2026
55*

The film is a scrappy but mostly entertaining chapter that returns to Neve Campbell and Kevin Williamson but feels like it is treading water. It offers inventive kills and some strong returns for familiar characters but lacks the sharp meta-commentary expected from the franchise creator.

Read the full review →
Variety
26 February 2026 · Owen Gleiberman
50*

Williamson returns the series to its roots in a straightforward, analog way that has enough shocks and yocks to keep audiences turning out for a weekend. The result is a back-to-basics sequel that nods at being convoluted but is really just a little too basic, lacking the meta scholarship or inventive scares of prior entries.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
27 February 2026 · ★★
40

The seventh film is the worst in the series and one to miss, with an underwhelming finale and obvious suspects throughout. Williamson directs but fails to deliver twists or energy that land effectively.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
26 February 2026 · Amy Nicholson
30*

The convoluted plot leaves the series limping despite Neve Campbell’s return as the trauma-scarred Sidney; the fun isn’t there. Arbitrary reveals, characters making dumb choices, and a script that burns energy on surprises suggest Williamson may be trying to kill the franchise off himself.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Scream 7 worth watching?
Scream 7 is worth watching only if you have seen the other six and would feel odd stopping now; we scored it 48. Neve Campbell and Courteney Cox are on form and the film is tidy and acted by grown-ups, but the murders are shot in a murk that hides the space, the suspects announce themselves early, and it has almost nothing to say about horror films.
How long is Scream 7, and what is it rated?
Scream 7 runs 1h 54m and is rated 14 by the CCC in Chile. It is a horror and mystery film.
Where can I watch Scream 7 in Chile?
Scream 7 is streaming on Paramount+, Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV in Chile, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from CLF 2.49. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Scream 7, and is it suitable for children?
Scream 7 carries a UK 18 certificate that is honestly earned, and it is not suitable for children. It is a slasher film built around repeated stalk-and-stab murders, most of them at night, so the squeamish should stay away. Older teenagers used to the series will find it less frightening than noisy, since the scenes are hard to read.
How does Scream 7 compare to Scream VI?
Scream 7 is the weaker of the two. Scream VI has two of the series' best set pieces in years, even if the talk between them is tired and its mystery is its weakest; the seventh film has no set pieces of that quality, and its murders play to a similar shape each time. The newer film does have Sidney back, and Campbell's return is its chief pleasure.
Do you need to have seen the other Scream films before Scream 7?
Scream 7 is not a good place to start, and it rewards viewers who know the earlier films. The plot follows on from Sidney's history, brings back Gale Weathers and the Meeks-Martin twins, and leans on Marco Beltrami's old themes and the suburban look of the 1996 original. A newcomer can follow the murders but will miss most of the point, and the first film is the one to begin with.
What should I watch after Scream 7?
After Scream 7, try Scream (1996, Fi1m 86): The original, when knowing the rules was still a new and frightening idea. Then The Cabin in the Woods (2011, Fi1m 80): Five students, one cabin, and an explanation for every horror cliché you have ever groaned at.
What order should I watch the Scream films in?
Release order is the safe choice for Scream, and it is the order our collection page lists them in. Scream 7 is the most recent of the 7 Scream titles on Fi1m; before it comes Scream VI. The full order.

Part of · 7 of 7

Scream

7 films on Fi1m · 1996–2026 · average 64 · best Scream 86

All 7 in order

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Scream (1996, Fi1m 86)The original, when knowing the rules was still a new and frightening idea.

  2. Behind the Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon (2006) · not reviewed yetA mockumentary slasher that takes the genre’s mechanics apart with real affection.

  3. The Cabin in the Woods (2011, Fi1m 80)Five students, one cabin, and an explanation for every horror cliché you have ever groaned at.

  4. Deep Red (1975) · not reviewed yetArgento’s Italian whodunit: a masked killer, a witness who saw too much, colours you can taste.

  5. Bodies Bodies Bodies (2022) · not reviewed yetRich kids, a party game and a storm; the murder mystery as group chat gone wrong.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever