The Ghost of Christmas Present and a woman in a pink dress tower over a man in snow
Film review

Scrooged

1988 · Directed by Richard Donner · 1h 41m

In a sentenceBill Murray regards Christmas cheer as something somebody else should deal with

Francis Cross (Bill Murray) has little interest in peace and goodwill as Christmas approaches. Claire Phillips (Karen Allen) and Grace Cooley (Alfre Woodard) are among the people around him, while the Ghost of Christmas Past (David Johansen) makes an unwelcome visit. Cross has no wish to make room for kindness, but supernatural visitors make him the subject of their attention. Drawing on Charles Dickens, the story brings ghosts into a Christmas Cross would prefer to conduct on his own terms.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Bill Murray’s bad temper supplies most of the pleasure in this uneven Christmas comedy. The ghosts have bite, but Richard Donner struggles to make the warmer passages as persuasive as the cruelty.

Richard Donner’s Scrooged is a fitfully funny Christmas comedy, worth considering for Bill Murray’s bad temper rather than for any dependable supply of festive warmth. Writers Michael O’Donoghue and Mitch Glazer give Francis Cross enough cruelty to keep the early scenes sharp. The difficulty comes when the film wants a broader range of feelings without making its other characters equally interesting. At 101 minutes, it still finds time to repeat effects that were more amusing before they became so insistent.

The attack on Santa’s workshop is a good indication of what works. We laughed at it because the violence makes such nonsense of the expected Christmas cosiness. J. Michael Riva’s production design gives the festive imagery enough solidity for its mistreatment to register, rather than letting everything look like a disposable joke. Richard Donner understands how much pleasure there can be in upsetting a familiar seasonal picture, and the opening has the confidence to do it without apology.

Bill Murray makes Francis Cross unpleasant without asking us to congratulate him for being daring. His sour expression is often funnier than the louder business, because it suggests that even the smallest demand on his goodwill is an affront. Alfre Woodard, as Grace Cooley, provides a welcome change in emphasis: her performance makes ordinary decency seem credible in surroundings that encourage caricature. We wanted more of that steadiness, particularly when the lead’s increasing volume begins to do the work of an actual joke.

David Johansen’s cab-driving Ghost of Christmas Past is another useful interruption, with a comic roughness that suits the film’s appetite for discomfort. Carol Kane’s Ghost of Christmas Present is more forceful still, and her directness gives the comedy a needed change of pace. Michael Chapman’s cinematography helps the supernatural material feel threatening enough to disturb the joking. The ghosts work because they can be funny without making the prospect of their company remotely appealing.

The less successful passages are the ones that keep pushing after the comic point is clear. William Steinkamp and Fredric Steinkamp’s editing allows the frantic stretches to run on, so that force gradually replaces surprise. Danny Elfman’s music is more persuasive at sustaining the supernatural unease than at helping the film towards tenderness. The craft gives the ghost story weight, but it cannot supply the quieter attention to people that the script too often neglects.

A Christmas comedy can be abrasive and still earn its moments of generosity. Here, the warmer passages ask for more sympathy than the writing has prepared us to give, and the change in tone can feel imposed. Richard Donner is more assured when unsettling us than when allowing a feeling to develop without pressing it. Against the expectations of the Christmas ghost story, this is a substantial weakness, even when the actors give him something worth leaving alone.

The PG certificate is worth noting alongside the sour humour and the film’s taste for frightening imagery. This is a poor choice for an evening that needs uncomplicated reassurance. If the attraction is Bill Murray in a sustained bad mood, allow for some noisy stretches between the laughs.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

53
Positive
3
Mixed
5
Negative
4

The available reviews lean mixed, with praise clustering around Bill Murray’s abrasive performance rather than the film as a whole. Even some detractors find him funny when the character is allowed to be unpleasant, while supporters welcome the dark comedy and supernatural elements. Several reviews also find individual gags or supporting performances worth singling out, though there is little agreement on how well these pleasures hold together.

The divide is wide: Collider warmly endorses the combination of Murray, dark humour and gothic horror, while Variety finds the comedy largely unfunny, making an exception for Carol Kane. Sentimentality is a recurring complaint across otherwise differing assessments, alongside concerns about muddled adaptation and mean-spirited excess. The disagreement concerns not just how many jokes work, but whether the abrasive comedy can support the warmer material. Four of the twelve listed reviews have no accessible verdict, limiting what can be said about their contribution.

RogerEbert.com
64*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be verified. The available text only shows a browser-check message.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
12 December 1988 · Pauline Kael
64*

The archive identifies Kael’s item as a review but does not reveal her verdict. It names Scrooged among three films but gives no specific praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
11 December 2018
64*

The page could not be read, so the critic’s verdict is unavailable. No praise or complaint can be identified from the accessible content.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· BC
64*

The accessible page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It also provides no detail about what the critic praises or criticizes.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · John Ferguson
60

The review finds the film a missed opportunity as its dark opening gives way to sentimentality. It praises Bill Murray’s sour-faced performance and notes that some of the gags still work.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
30*

The review is largely negative, finding the film funny mainly when Bill Murray plays its lead as a bastard. It praises the opening attack on Santa’s workshop and David Johansen’s cab-driver ghost, but criticizes the sentimental ending and wasted Robert Mitchum.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Scrooged worth watching?
Scrooged is worth considering for Bill Murray’s sour humour rather than dependable festive warmth, and we score it 66 out of 100. We find the abrasive comedy and threatening ghosts more persuasive than the warmer passages; it suits viewers happy to accept noisy, repetitive stretches between the laughs.
How long is Scrooged, and what is it rated?
Scrooged runs 1h 41m. It is a fantasy and comedy film.
Where can I watch Scrooged in Estonia?
Scrooged is not on any streaming or rental service in Estonia at the moment. It is available in 1 other country; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How does Scrooged compare to The Apartment?
Scrooged is the harsher, noisier Christmas comedy; we recommend The Apartment more readily for its patience with lonely, wounded people. Both find humour in workplace callousness, but Billy Wilder’s office romance makes its unhappiness matter more, despite a leisurely second half. Choose Scrooged chiefly for Murray’s bad temper and the supernatural discomfort.
Is Scrooged based on a true story or a book?
Scrooged draws on a novel by Charles Dickens rather than a true story, reworking the Christmas ghost story around Francis Cross. No prior reading is needed to follow its premise: a man with little interest in goodwill finds himself receiving unwelcome supernatural attention.
What should I watch after Scrooged?
After Scrooged, try The Apartment (1960, Fi1m 91): Workplace callousness and Christmas loneliness, with more patience for wounded people. Then Brazil (1985, Fi1m 83): Corporate cruelty and elaborate fantasy, for those who prefer their Christmas cheer rationed; and Tokyo Godfathers (2003, Fi1m 82): A Christmas journey whose rough edges make its kindness easier to believe.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1989

Nominated
Best Makeup and Hairstyling

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Apartment (1960, Fi1m 91)Workplace callousness and Christmas loneliness, with more patience for wounded people.

  2. Brazil (1985, Fi1m 83)Corporate cruelty and elaborate fantasy, for those who prefer their Christmas cheer rationed.

  3. Tokyo Godfathers (2003, Fi1m 82)A Christmas journey whose rough edges make its kindness easier to believe.

  4. Rare Exports (2010) · not reviewed yetA Finnish Christmas fantasy that takes the threat behind festive folklore seriously.

  5. Groundhog Day (1993, Fi1m 88)Bill Murray gets another chance to make an unpleasant man worth caring about.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever