A blonde woman and a red-haired traveler sit beside a yellow caravan on a grassy hillside
Film review

Stardust

2007 · Directed by Matthew Vaughn · 2h 07m

In a sentenceA sweet romance, with Michelle Pfeiffer behaving as though nobody told her it was a family film

A falling star sets a chase in motion in this fantasy adventure adapted from Neil Gaiman’s novel. Tristan Thorn (Charlie Cox) and Yvaine (Claire Danes) are the pair at the centre of its romance, while the witch Lamia (Michelle Pfeiffer) supplies a threat. Around them, the story takes in princes and introduces Captain Shakespeare (Robert De Niro), alongside Septimus (Mark Strong), Primus (Jason Flemyng) and Victoria (Sienna Miller). Courtship unfolds amid magic and danger, with a growing company of characters sharing the adventure.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Matthew Vaughn’s fairy tale is funny, affectionate and overfilled, with Claire Danes anchoring the romance and Michelle Pfeiffer supplying a welcome threat. The detours take their time, but the company is worth keeping.

Stardust is an enjoyable fairy tale with a good romance and rather more company than it needs. Matthew Vaughn, adapting Neil Gaiman’s novel with Jane Goldman, lets the adventure be silly without apologising for its sweetness. A falling star sets a chase in motion, and the film finds room for witches, princes and a captain along the way. We recommend it for the cast and the pleasure of a fantasy that allows its characters to be ridiculous.

Charlie Cox’s Tristan Thorn and Claire Danes’s Yvaine give the romance enough warmth to survive all that activity. He is an agreeable lead, though he sometimes seems less interesting than the people sharing his scenes. She supplies the sharper presence, keeping the sweetness from becoming bland. We want the film to spend more time with them, which is a useful measure of a screen romance and a warning about how often this one wanders away.

Michelle Pfeiffer is the reason those interruptions can be worth having, playing Lamia with enough seriousness for the witch’s threat to register through the comic business. We were unsettled by her. She lets the pleasure of being cruel show without needing the fantasy trappings to do all the frightening. Robert De Niro’s Captain Shakespeare gives the film a different sort of pleasure, with a willingness to look foolish that is difficult to resist. Both performances deserve the space they get, even if some of the other comic business needs trimming.

Ben Davis’s colourful cinematography keeps the fantasy inviting, which suits a story this willing to make jokes. Gavin Bocquet’s production design gives the supporting cast plenty of visual competition, sometimes more than the scenes require. We like the abundance, but the spectacle can distract from the central couple, whose scenes need little embellishment. The effects are persuasive enough to support the adventure, including its more extravagant ambitions.

Jon Harris’s editing has to accommodate an unruly collection of comic performances, romantic scenes and fantasy spectacle. The individual passages are often lively, but the movement between them does not always let the romance gather strength. Ilan Eshkeri’s score gives the adventure enthusiasm, though we occasionally wished the music would leave a little more room for the actors. At 127 minutes, the film has enough time for its pleasures and enough extra time for some of them to wear thin.

The awkwardness comes from a screenplay reluctant to leave an amusing idea alone. A joke can be funny and still arrive at the wrong moment, particularly when a fairy tale is asking us to believe in danger. Too often the comedy lets us relax before a threat has properly taken hold. Even so, the black humour gives the adventure some bite, and its frightening witch belongs in a tradition of fairy tales that do not make childhood entirely comfortable.

There is enough affection here to make the untidiness forgivable, provided a busy fairy tale is what the evening calls for. Those who prefer their adventures brisk should take the running time seriously; this one enjoys its detours. Just do not expect the witch to make allowances for younger company.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

68
Positive
6
Mixed
6
Negative
0

The reviews lean towards an enjoyable but uneven fantasy, with praise centred on its charm, playful storytelling and cast. Michelle Pfeiffer draws the most consistent approval, bringing comic resourcefulness and menace to the witch Lamia. Robert De Niro’s playful performance also has admirers, while the supporting cast helps sustain the humour. Critics respond to the film’s imagination and adventurous spirit, even when they find the storytelling untidy.

Reservations cluster around an overstuffed plot and an uncertain balance between comedy, romance and enchantment. Some find the humour part of the pleasure; others think it weakens the fantasy or simply falls flat. The spread runs from qualified approval to considerable enthusiasm, with no wholly negative assessment. Den of Geek is the most enthusiastic, praising the humour and family appeal, while Slant Magazine finds the adaptation competent but uninspired, burdened by spectacle and plot holes.

Radio Times
★★★★ · Brian Pendreigh
80

Pendreigh gives the adaptation a positive review, comparing its appeal to classic fantasy adventures. He praises its imagination, scale, humour and cross-generational appeal.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
10 August 2007 · B · Tasha Robinson
77

Robinson finds the film an overextended but enjoyable fantasy that settles for expansive joy rather than dramatic tautness. She particularly praises Robert De Niro’s playful performance and the terrific effects.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
9 August 2007 · ★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
75

Ebert regards the film as an entertaining fantasy adventure. He praises its charm and playful storytelling.

Read the full review →
Empire
28 September 2007 · Dan Jolin
70*

Jolin finds Stardust patchy but great fun, with a sweet, silly fairy-tale romance. He praises its black humour, especially the cartoon-comical deaths of the princes.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
9 August 2007 · Sura Wood
65*

The critic finds the fantasy adventure diverting and pleasurable, though its humor sometimes weakens its enchantment. Michelle Pfeiffer’s resourceful, genuinely frightening performance is singled out for praise, while the comedy is criticized for falling flat.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
2 August 2007 · Mike Goodridge
60*

Goodridge describes the film as entertaining, ribald and clever, but hints that it may fall short. He singles out its ambitious high-concept adventure premise as a strength.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Stardust worth watching?
Stardust is worth watching for its warm romance, playful fantasy and cast, and we score it 75 out of 100. Claire Danes keeps the sweetness sharp and Michelle Pfeiffer makes the witch unsettling, though at 127 minutes the crowded adventure takes more detours than we would like.
How long is Stardust, and what is it rated?
Stardust runs 2h 07m. It is an adventure and fantasy film.
Where can I watch Stardust in Colombia?
Stardust is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from CO$7900.00. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Stardust compare to The Princess Bride?
Stardust offers a more rewarding central romance, but we give The Princess Bride the edge as an easy recommendation. Both fairy tales let affection matter alongside the jokes; The Princess Bride has the swordplay and engaging companions, while Stardust suits those happy to indulge a crowded adventure for its lovers and threatening witch.
Is Stardust based on a true story or a book?
Stardust is adapted from Neil Gaiman’s novel, not based on a true story, with Matthew Vaughn and Jane Goldman adapting it for the screen. Knowing the book is not necessary to enjoy the romance and comic adventure; we recommend the film for its characters and cast rather than its fidelity to the source.
What should I watch after Stardust?
After Stardust, try The Princess Bride (1987, Fi1m 86): Another fairy tale that lets the romance matter as much as the jokes. Then A Matter of Life and Death (1946, Fi1m 92): For lovers whose difficulties require a larger canvas than the usual courtship; and Howl's Moving Castle (2004, Fi1m 81): A romance surrounded by magic, with room for fear and tenderness.

Cast

Awards

BAFTA Film Awards, 2008

Nominated
BAFTA's Children & Young People Award - Feature Film

GLAAD Media Award for Outstanding Film – Wide Release, 2008

Won
GLAAD Media Award for Outstanding Film – Wide Release

Hugo Awards, 2008

Won
Best Dramatic Presentation, Long Form

Saturn Awards, 2007

Nominated
Best Costume

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Princess Bride (1987, Fi1m 86)Another fairy tale that lets the romance matter as much as the jokes.

  2. A Matter of Life and Death (1946, Fi1m 92)For lovers whose difficulties require a larger canvas than the usual courtship.

  3. Howl's Moving Castle (2004, Fi1m 81)A romance surrounded by magic, with room for fear and tenderness.

  4. Donkey Skin (1970) · not reviewed yetA colourful French fairy tale with songs, peculiar courtship and disconcerting family arrangements.

  5. Time Bandits (1981, Fi1m 80)For travelling companions whose bad behaviour is half the pleasure.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever