Greg Platt (Ewan McGregor) driving a car with three family members
Film review

The End of Oak Street

2026 · Directed by David Robert Mitchell · 1h 40m · ClassInd 14

In a sentenceSpielberg’s lawns, Mitchell’s dread, and the dinosaurs are the only ones on the street who know what they want

Oak Street is an ordinary stretch of 1980s American suburbia, and the Platts live at the end of it. Denise (Anne Hathaway) and Greg (Ewan McGregor) are a marriage under strain; their children Audrey (Maisy Stella) and Brian (Christian Convery) have noticed. Then the street, houses and lawns and all, is somewhere it should not be. Beyond the last fence the world is prehistoric, and what lives out there is hungry and has found the neighbourhood. With neighbours including Mel Jacobs (P.J. Byrne), Mary Bagrowski (Bethany Anne Lind) and Mrs Valcour (Emily Kuroda), the family has to work out what has happened, how far it goes, and how to stay alive until they do. David Robert Mitchell writes and directs.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

David Robert Mitchell’s dinosaurs-in-suburbia picture is brisk, handsome and often frightening, and Anne Hathaway carries it. The family drama it keeps setting up is never played out, and the ending steps back from the darker film it had been promising.

David Robert Mitchell has made a Spielberg film, and he knows it. The End of Oak Street takes a 1980s American street, the Platt family at the end of it, and drops the lot into a prehistoric world where the lawns stop at a treeline full of dinosaurs. The tagline, “Where goes the neighborhood”, is the whole pitch. It is a monster film in a housing estate, it runs a tidy 100 minutes, and for long stretches it does exactly what it says it will. Where it falls short is the family, which matters, because the family is what Mitchell asks us to care about.

Mike Gioulakis, who shot It Follows for Mitchell, lights the street in flat, warm afternoon sun that does not change when the world does, so the houses look ordinary and the thing coming across the grass does not. Maya Shimoguchi builds a street of driveways, screen doors and cluttered garages that the film then takes apart room by room. Erin Benach’s costumes get the period right without winking at it. The creatures are good, properly heavy, and Mitchell stages the attacks with the patience he brought to his horror work, letting a shape sit at the edge of the frame for longer than is comfortable before anyone in the scene turns round.

Hathaway is the reason to go. Denise Platt begins as a woman holding a household together by force of will, and once the animals arrive she becomes something fast, dirty and unglamorous, and the film is at its best when it simply follows her. Maisy Stella gives Audrey a sullen intelligence the script rewards more than it rewards anyone else. McGregor has the harder job: Greg is written as the weak point in the marriage and the film never decides whether it likes him, so neither does he. Christian Convery, as Brian, is asked mainly to be in danger, and is.

Michael Giacchino’s score is the film’s most open act of homage, brass and strings that could have been written in 1982, and it is mixed to be enjoyed rather than to drown anything, which we were grateful for. John Axelrad cuts the attacks cleanly, always telling us where the door is and how far away the animal is, which is more than most creature films bother with. He is less sure in the kitchen. The domestic scenes come in the same length and rhythm whether the subject is the mortgage or the thing in the garden, and after a while they blur.

We should say what it did to us. The first time a house on Oak Street comes apart we were properly frightened, the good kind of fright a 12A rarely allows. There is one death in the middle we will not describe that is so strange and so nasty we laughed, then felt slightly ashamed of ourselves. By the fourth or fifth encounter we had noticed the pattern: someone leaves shelter, something arrives, someone is pulled back at the last second. The fear did not survive the repetition, and the film seemed not to notice it had gone.

The larger trouble is the Platts. Mitchell sets up a marriage in real difficulty, two children who have noticed, a street of small resentments between neighbours, and then uses almost none of it. The dinosaurs do not test these people; they interrupt them. Every argument is cut short by a roar, and by the end the roars have done the work the arguing was meant to do, which saves the script the trouble. The last twenty minutes step back from the darker film Mitchell had been hinting at, and we came out irritated, not because the ending is bad but because a braver one was plainly available.

It Follows (2014) had one idea and never let go of it. Under the Silver Lake (2018) had a hundred and lost most of them. This sits between the two: a good premise, a better lead, and a script that has seen Jurassic Park and Close Encounters of the Third Kind and cannot decide which one it is remaking.

See it in a cinema, where the animals are the size they should be and the sound does the frightening. Take anyone over twelve; the dinosaurs will hold them and the marriage will not detain them. It opened in UK cinemas on 14 August 2026 and runs 100 minutes.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

69
Positive
12
Mixed
6
Negative
2

Most critics like The End of Oak Street, though the spread is wide, running from outright raves to two firm dismissals. The praise gathers around the dinosaur set-pieces and creature effects, which several reviews rate above the recent Jurassic entries, and around Anne Hathaway, singled out in nearly every review as the film’s anchor; Ewan McGregor divides them more.

The Spielberg and Amblin homage is the point of contention. For the majority it is affectionate and given a darker edge by Mitchell; for a sizeable minority it is the problem. The Los Angeles Times calls it Spielberg cosplay, The New Yorker finds the homage sits uneasily with Mitchell’s detachment, and The Guardian and The Wrap go further, finding it inert and toothless respectively, with little real jeopardy and a family drama that wastes its own set-up. Even admirers concede thin characters, repetitive encounters and a premise that does not survive much scrutiny.

Vulture
12 August 2026
90*

The critic finds it an audacious good time that slams Jurassic Park into Close Encounters, better than expected Spielberg pastiche with infectious glee in the carnage and nostalgic Americana commentary.

Read the full review →
Empire
12 August 2026 · John Nugent
80*

The critic praises the film as a summer blockbuster that wholeheartedly embraces its big, brash genre pleasures and largely out-dinos recent Jurassic entries with tense set-pieces and handsome mounting. They single out the convincing character work on suburban family anxiety as what makes the outlandish premise a delight.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
13 August 2026 · ★★★★ · Rosie Fletcher
80

The review describes it as a loving Spielberg homage that works well as a moving, funny and thrilling family romp with a dark heart, crediting Mitchell for a fresh take on the sub-genre.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
12 August 2026
80*

The critic calls the film a heartfelt and boisterous homage to Spielberg, praising the nostalgic adventure and performances by Anne Hathaway and Ewan McGregor as endearing parents in a dinosaur-filled suburban setting. They single out the fun of watching the stars chased by prehistoric monsters.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 August 2026 · ★★★★ · Dan Jolin
80

The critic praises the fresh spin on dinosaur carnage in a suburban time-warp setting, highlighting the gripping survival thriller elements and strong performances despite some plot holes.

Read the full review →
Variety
12 August 2026 · Owen Gleiberman
80*

Celebrates the shamelessly fun, preposterous last-gasp-of-summer trash as a loopier Jurassic knockoff that succeeds by leaning into pandering with B-movie humanity and vivid performances.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The End of Oak Street worth watching?
The End of Oak Street is worth watching for anyone who wants a brisk, handsome monster film with a strong lead, and we scored it 66. Anne Hathaway carries it and the early attacks are properly frightening, but the marriage at its centre is set up and never played out. See it in a cinema if you can.
How long is The End of Oak Street, and what is it rated?
The End of Oak Street runs 1h 40m and is rated 14 by the ClassInd in Brazil. It is a science fiction and mystery film.
Where can I watch The End of Oak Street in Brazil?
The End of Oak Street is available to buy from Amazon Prime Video from R$59.90. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is The End of Oak Street, and is it suitable for children?
The End of Oak Street is a 12A and earns the certificate: the early dinosaur attacks are frightening, and one death in the middle is strange and nasty enough to unsettle. It is fine for anyone over twelve; younger or more nervous children may find the sequences where a shape waits at the edge of the frame too much.
How does The End of Oak Street compare to Jurassic Park?
The End of Oak Street borrows openly from Jurassic Park, and the earlier film remains the better one, because it gets the animals right and makes us want to stand and stare at them. Mitchell's picture has the stronger lead performance and a more patient, horror-bred sense of dread, but its fear fades with repetition and its family drama goes nowhere.
What should I watch after The End of Oak Street?
After The End of Oak Street, try Jurassic Park (1993, Fi1m 91): The film this one keeps glancing at, and still the one that gets the animals right. Then Attack the Block (2011, Fi1m 84): Monsters on a south London estate, with sharper people and a tighter running time; and Poltergeist (1982, Fi1m 84): The suburban house that turns on its owners, from the decade Mitchell is borrowing.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Jurassic Park (1993, Fi1m 91)The film this one keeps glancing at, and still the one that gets the animals right.

  2. Attack the Block (2011, Fi1m 84)Monsters on a south London estate, with sharper people and a tighter running time.

  3. The Host (2006) · not reviewed yetBong Joon-ho’s river creature and a squabbling family who are the real point of the film.

  4. Poltergeist (1982, Fi1m 84)The suburban house that turns on its owners, from the decade Mitchell is borrowing.

  5. It Follows (2014, Fi1m 84)Mitchell and Gioulakis with one idea, one street, and no need for dinosaurs.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever