Film review

Jurassic Park

1993 · Directed by Steven Spielberg · 2h 07m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceWe wanted to see the dinosaurs, then developed quite firm opinions about the appropriate distance

AdventureScience Fiction

Grant (Sam Neill), Ellie (Laura Dern) and Malcolm (Jeff Goldblum) are among a group of people caught on an island with dinosaurs. As the creatures become a threat, the humans face the consequences of an undertaking driven by money and the belief that nature can be controlled. Richard Attenborough plays Hammond, with Joseph Mazzello as Tim and Ariana Richards as Lex. Adapted from Michael Crichton’s novel, Steven Spielberg’s science-fiction adventure follows the group’s encounter with the animals and their struggle to survive when fascination gives way to danger.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Steven Spielberg’s dinosaur adventure is thrilling, patient and properly frightening. The human characters are thin, but the suspense makes us care about them anyway, and the creatures are worth the evening on their own.

Jurassic Park is an excellent adventure film whose dinosaurs make its thin human characters easier to forgive. Steven Spielberg takes the prospect of people trapped on an island with rampaging creatures and gives it time to become frightening, rather than treating panic as the starting point. Before the danger takes over, he allows the dinosaurs to be something worth looking at. We need to want them there, at least briefly, for their presence to feel like anything more than a pest-control problem.

Dean Cundey’s cinematography is crucial to that persuasion: the dinosaurs look as though they occupy the same space as the people. We believe in their weight and proximity, which makes the human figures beside them seem suddenly ill-equipped. Rick Carter’s production design has the less conspicuous job of making the surroundings feel as substantial as the animals, and it succeeds. We spend little time mentally separating the creatures from the places they inhabit, or admiring the technical work instead of watching what happens.

Michael Kahn’s editing lets the menace build before giving sustained peril its turn. We were surprised by how quickly our delight gave way to fear. The dinosaurs seem solid enough to hurt the people beside them, and suddenly their size matters differently. John Williams’s music gives the wonder room to register, so that the film’s affection for its animals survives even when they become dangerous.

The people are less fully imagined. Sam Neill’s Grant and Laura Dern’s Ellie give us enough to stay interested, while Jeff Goldblum’s Malcolm brings a welcome suggestion that solemnity might not be the appropriate response to all this. Richard Attenborough’s Hammond supplies warmth, though warmth alone cannot supply the complexity that the writing leaves out. Michael Crichton and David Koepp’s screenplay is efficient about moving human beings towards danger and much less interested in giving them lives we can imagine beyond it.

Crichton also supplies the source novel, and the caution about reckless ambition remains clear even when Spielberg is enjoying the results. Money and the wish to control nature give the disaster a cause more interesting than simple bad luck. The film does soften its criticism when it turns towards reassurance, and some of that comfort feels supplied for an audience the danger might otherwise upset. We could have done with less of it, especially when the dinosaur sequences are so confident about how much fear we can take.

Most critics disagree with us about just how good this is. Their complaints about thin characters are fair, but we think they give that weakness too much weight: the dinosaur sequences make us care about people whose lives away from the island are scarcely sketched. Within the monster-film tradition, Spielberg understands the value of letting us become interested in the creatures before asking us to fear them. The effects make that possible, but the patient build gives them their force.

At 127 minutes, the film gives its creatures room without requiring much patience from anyone who has come to meet them. The PG certificate should not be mistaken for an assurance that the fear is mild. See it with someone who claims they no longer get frightened by dinosaurs.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

69
Positive
4
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics respond positively to Jurassic Park, with the strongest agreement centred on the dinosaurs. The reviews repeatedly praise the convincing effects, the combination of practical work and computer imagery, and the suspense built around the creatures. Spielberg’s handling of peril attracts considerable admiration, though enthusiasm for the spectacle does not always extend to the people running from it. The broad consensus is that the technical achievement carries much of the film’s appeal.

The spread runs from qualified approval to wholehearted enthusiasm, with character and substance the main dividing lines. The Los Angeles Times finds a routine jeopardy picture beneath the effects, while Total Film praises the character moments alongside the set-pieces. Critics also disagree about how much of the cautionary story survives: Sight and Sound sees compromises in drama and critique, whereas Polygon finds a sustained warning about greed and reckless ambition. Agreement on the dinosaurs leaves plenty unsettled elsewhere.

RogerEbert.com
11 June 1993 · ★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
75

Ebert praises the dinosaurs' special effects but criticizes the weak human characters and lack of awe. The film works as a monster movie but could have been more.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
11 June 1993 · Janet Maslin
75*

Maslin calls it a milestone for its dinosaurs but notes Spielberg softened the story's bite for sequel potential.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
11 June 1993 · Kenneth Turan
50*

Turan praises the dinosaurs' realism but finds the rest of the film a standard-issue jeopardy picture lacking strong characters or direction.

Read the full review →
The Times
15 July 1993 · Geoff Brown
45*

Spielberg's film excels in surface thrills and technical effects but is otherwise a scrappy B-movie tale blown out of proportion by hype and budget.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 1993 · Caroline Westbrook

Spielberg turns Crichton's novel into an awe-inspiring blockbuster with gradually building menace in the first half followed by unforgettable set pieces. The dinosaurs are the real stars, a miracle of modern moviemaking, making it one of the greatest blockbusters of all time.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 August 1993

The review praises the film's spectacular effects and magnificent dinosaur sequences as definitive, while noting it transforms Crichton's cautionary novel into a commercially appealing entertainment machine with some compromises in drama and critique.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 1994

Won
Best Sound
Won
Best Sound Editing
Won
Best Visual Effects

Hugo Awards, 1994

Won
Best Dramatic Presentation

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie, 1994

Won
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie

Saturn Awards, 1994

Won
Best Director
Won
Best Science Fiction Film

If you liked this, try…

Jaws poster93

Jaws

1975 · Spielberg makes another dangerous animal matter by making us wait.

King Kong poster

King Kong

1933 · Another creature spectacle where fascination survives even after the danger becomes clear.

Godzilla poster

Godzilla

1954 · For monster-film fear with a harsher sense of human responsibility.

The Host poster

The Host

2006 · A Korean creature film with a family worth worrying about.

Tremors poster83

Tremors

1990 · Practical people confront improbable animals, with more wit and less solemnity.