Film review

The Lost World: Jurassic Park

1997 · Directed by Steven Spielberg · 2h 09m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceTwo tyrannosaurs push a caravan off a cliff, and nothing afterwards quite matches it

AdventureActionScience Fiction

A British family’s yacht puts in at a second island where InGen bred its dinosaurs and then abandoned them, and a small girl wandering the beach is set upon by a pack of compsognathus, animals no bigger than chickens. John Hammond (Richard Attenborough), pushed out of his own company by Peter Ludlow (Arliss Howard), asks Ian Malcolm (Jeff Goldblum) to lead a team recording the animals before Ludlow’s people arrive to take them. Malcolm refuses, then agrees, because his partner, the palaeontologist Sarah Harding (Julianne Moore), is already on the island alone. He flies out with the photographer Nick Van Owen (Vince Vaughn) and the engineer Eddie Carr (Richard Schiff), not knowing his daughter Kelly (Vanessa Lee Chester) has stowed away, while the hunter Roland Tembo (Pete Postlethwaite) brings Ludlow’s expedition ashore.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Spielberg’s sequel has better dinosaurs, a meaner streak and one sequence, in a trailer on a cliff, as good as anything he has made. It also has a script that treats its people as bait and a last half hour that goes somewhere silly.

Steven Spielberg goes back to Michael Crichton’s dinosaurs four years after Jurassic Park (1993), and this time he has left the wonder at home. John Hammond (Richard Attenborough) has lost his company to Peter Ludlow (Arliss Howard), and wants a record of the animals on the second island before Ludlow’s men crate them up. Ian Malcolm (Jeff Goldblum) goes because Sarah Harding (Julianne Moore) is already there. That is David Koepp’s setup, and it is a good one. What follows is a monster film with better monsters than its predecessor and much less idea of what to do with them, and we came out admiring the animals and shrugging at the people.

The opening sets the tone. A little girl wanders off from a picnic on the beach and finds a small dinosaur, about the size of a chicken, and then its friends, and then the film cuts to her mother’s scream. Spielberg did something like it on a beach in Jaws (1975), with the same relish. It is a nastier film than the first one. The PG is earned by cutting away, not holding back.

The middle hour is where the money went. Janusz Kamiński shoots nearly all of it at night and in rain, the jungle lit by headlamps and lightning, so the animals arrive out of black. Rick Carter’s research vehicle, two trailers joined by a concertina passage, is the film’s best prop, and Spielberg spends a quarter of an hour taking it apart. Two tyrannosaurs shove it towards the edge of a cliff, and Moore ends up lying on a pane of glass above the drop, watching it crack beneath her. We gripped the armrest and did not let go. Michael Kahn gives every fracture in the glass its own shot, and the sound of it is worse than anything the dinosaurs do.

Goldblum, promoted to lead, does the whole thing in a sardonic mutter, and does it well. Pete Postlethwaite is the best thing here: a hunter who has come for one animal and cares nothing for the money, played with a stillness the others lack. Vince Vaughn’s Nick Van Owen is a saboteur written as a hero, and the film never notices that nearly every disaster follows from something he did. Vanessa Lee Chester’s Kelly is on the island because the script needs a child there.

Koepp’s screenplay is a chain of reasons for people to be in the wrong place, thinning as it goes. The sequence in the long grass, where a line of hunters is taken from below one at a time, is beautifully staged and means little, because we have not met most of the men being eaten. The film’s case for leaving the animals alone is made by Hammond in a speech and never shown. John Williams writes a darker, more percussive score than before, drums and low brass, and uses the old theme sparingly. It never stops in daylight to simply look at the animals, and we missed that.

The last half hour takes the film somewhere we will not describe. It is bold and silly, and we watched it with weary disbelief: not frightened, not thrilled, just aware that an expensive machine had run out of road and kept driving.

Against Spielberg’s own record this is a professional’s sequel, the work of a man who could do this in his sleep and, for stretches, did. See it for the trailer, for Postlethwaite, and for the little dinosaurs on the beach. Watch it at home, where the night scenes are easier to read and the ending can be switched off. It runs 129 minutes and reached UK cinemas on 18 July 1997.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

63
Positive
8
Mixed
3
Negative
3

Most critics come down in favour, though not by much, and the praise is nearly all for the dinosaurs. The effects are called an improvement on the original, the set pieces tense and precisely built, and Spielberg’s direction more relaxed and self-aware than before. Goldblum’s performance and John Williams’s score get their mentions. Several later writers make a case for the film’s mean streak, arguing that its cruelty is the point and that this is the closest Spielberg has come to a horror film.

The reservations cluster on the script: a thin rescue-mission plot, weak human characters and an ending that stretches belief. The 1997 notices are the coolest, with RogerEbert.com, Time Out and Total Film all finding the wonder of the first film gone and formula in its place. The reappraisals, from Vulture to Collider, are markedly warmer. The spread is wide, running from outright dismissal to something close to a rave.

Vulture
7 August 2020 · Bilge Ebiri
85*

The critic celebrates the film as Spielberg’s nastiest, a demented horror-like sequence of action set pieces with technical skill and cruelty, highlighting its mean streak and parental themes amid the carnage.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
26 May 1997 · Terrence Rafferty
80*

Spielberg brings visual wit and relaxed, self-aware showmanship missing from the first film, turning the creature-feature into playful entertainment that amuses even as it manipulates.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
9 May 2014 · Mike D'Angelo
75*

The critic finds it a lot of fun as a straightforward monster movie with improved effects, strong Goldblum performance, and precise set pieces, free of the original's pretensions.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
23 May 1997 · Stephen Holden
75*

The sequel is a fast-paced adventure film that excels at spectacle and lifelike dinosaurs, especially the smaller compsognathus, though messages are less neatly packaged than in the original.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
27 May 2017 · Josh Slater-Williams
65*

The piece highlights how a particularly brutal T-Rex attack scene in the film shocked the writer as a child and changed their view of cinema's capacity for cruelty. It positions the movie as a cynical, macabre follow-up to the original that abandons wonder for darker tones, though it stops short of calling it a classic.

Read the full review →
Variety
25 May 1997 · Leonard Klady
65*

Dinosaur effects are improved and credible, delivering visceral thrills, but the schematic script and thin plot make it a standard chase film that relies on manipulation over substance.

Read the full review →

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1998

Nominated
Best Visual Effects

If you liked this, try…