Tom Booker (Robert Redford) gently touches a horse in a ranch paddock
Film review

The Horse Whisperer

1998 · Directed by Robert Redford · 2h 49m · Kijkwijzer 18

In a sentenceRobert Redford has all the time in the world, and expects us to have it too

An accident leaves Grace MacLean (Scarlett Johansson) and her horse in need of help. Tom Booker (Robert Redford) becomes involved in their recovery, while Annie MacLean (Kristin Scott Thomas) tries to find a way forward. Grace has to face what has happened to her; Annie has difficulties of her own. Working to help the girl and the horse brings Annie and Tom closer together. The practical business of recovery becomes entangled with a romance that neither can approach without hesitation.

Fi1m review

Robert Redford gives this romance care, strong performances and more time than it needs. Kristin Scott Thomas keeps the emotions credible, but 169 minutes is a long wait for a film this restrained.

Robert Redford approaches The Horse Whisperer as though every difficult feeling deserves time to settle before anyone speaks. That seriousness is welcome in a romance, and the performances often reward it, but the film is too long for the story it has to tell. Adapted from Nicholas Evans’s novel by Richard LaGravenese and Eric Roth, it takes the difficulties of recovery seriously. At 169 minutes, however, its patience becomes a substantial demand on ours.

We were horrified by the opening accident. Its violence makes the subsequent need for care convincing, and that matters when the film begins asking us to accept a calmer pace. The shock stays with us through the quieter passages, giving the characters’ distress a weight that dialogue alone could not provide. Those early scenes also demonstrate a concentration that the film cannot sustain once the romance begins taking up more of its attention.

Kristin Scott Thomas supplies the friction the film needs as Annie MacLean. Her restraint suggests how much effort it takes to remain composed, and she makes the character’s vulnerability convincing without smoothing away her awkwardness. Scarlett Johansson, as Grace MacLean, keeps the recovery story focused on the person having to endure it. The performances give us good reasons to remain interested even when the screenplay has stopped finding fresh things for its characters to express.

Tom Booker is a less complicated character, and that gradually becomes a problem. Robert Redford fits the role comfortably, but Tom is so steadily reassuring that the film leaves us little to discover about him. The romance consequently feels uneven: his co-star supplies the uncertainty while he remains available to soothe it. We wanted him to be harder to read, especially in a film that spends so long waiting for people to acknowledge what they feel.

Robert Richardson’s cinematography gives the landscape enough prominence that the wish to linger there becomes understandable. The views remain worth looking at even when the drama has stopped moving. Jon Hutman’s production design sits quietly within those surroundings and never distracts attention from the actors. The care is evident, although the scenery sometimes holds our interest more successfully than the people standing in it.

The editing, credited to Hank Corwin, Freeman A. Davies and Tom Rolf, needs a firmer hand. The leisurely pace allows the actors room, but the romantic hesitation eventually becomes repetitive, with too little change to justify the time spent watching. Thomas Newman’s music supports the tenderness without making those stretches feel less prolonged. The screenplay also shares responsibility; simply shortening pauses would not solve the shortage of new things for Tom and Annie to discover about each other.

There is room in romantic drama for adults who do not instantly know what to say, and the film treats their uncertainty with respect. The trouble is that it keeps extending our wait after the performances have made their feelings clear. Kristin Scott Thomas gives patient admirers of the genre a reason to stay, though the length remains a considerable reservation. Come for the performances and scenery; do not expect the opening’s urgency to accompany them.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

68
Positive
4
Mixed
5
Negative
0

The reviews lean towards qualified approval, with praise clustering around the Montana scenery, the performances and the patient handling of the emotions. Critics who respond warmly find an old-fashioned romance that gives its characters’ feelings time to develop without forcing them. The opening accident also draws attention for its frightening intensity, while the casting of Redford and Kristin Scott Thomas earns approval. Across the accessible reviews, the film’s care and craftsmanship are more consistently admired than its storytelling.

Length and pacing account for the clearest reservations: several critics find the story too slight or slow to sustain the running time, particularly as the romance progresses. The spread is mostly between appreciative and mixed, with no outright negative verdict recorded. Eye for Film is notably more enthusiastic, singling out Scott Thomas’s emotional subtlety. Three reviews have insufficient accessible text to establish their reasoning, which limits how fully the apparent agreement can be described.

The AV Club
29 March 2002 · Joshua Klein
75*

Klein finds the film haunting and beautiful, with a patient, emotionally unforced approach. He especially praises its striking landscapes and the frightening intensity of the opening accident.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Angie Errigo
70*

Errigo finds it a beautifully crafted, moving old-fashioned romance, though its story is too slight for its length and its appeal is limited for younger viewers. She particularly praises the striking visuals and the poignancy of the country dance between Tom and Annie.

Read the full review →
Variety
4 May 1998 · Todd McCarthy
70*

McCarthy finds the film an intelligent, emotionally powerful and mature adaptation, though its length and restrained romance weaken its final stretch. He praises the performances, striking Montana visuals and careful direction for bringing the material vividly to life.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The review text was unavailable, so its verdict cannot be determined. No praise or complaint could be verified from the accessible page.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
15 May 1998
64*

The page content is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be established. The URL headline suggests a focus on healing a girl, her horse, and her mother, but specific praise or criticism cannot be verified.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TCh
64*

The available text is too limited to establish the critic’s overall verdict. It describes Redford’s character as an idealised figure, but the review’s specific praise or complaint is not available.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Horse Whisperer worth watching?
The Horse Whisperer is worth considering for patient admirers of romantic drama, and we score it 68 out of 100. Kristin Scott Thomas keeps the emotions credible, and the scenery rewards attention, but the romantic hesitation becomes repetitive. At 169 minutes, we find it asks for more patience than its story earns.
How long is The Horse Whisperer, and what is it rated?
The Horse Whisperer runs 2h 49m and is rated 18 by the Kijkwijzer in Belgium. It is an adventure and drama film.
Where can I watch The Horse Whisperer in Belgium?
The Horse Whisperer is streaming on Disney+ in Belgium, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from €3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does The Horse Whisperer compare to Local Hero?
The Horse Whisperer is a more solemn romance than Local Hero, which we recommend as the more rewarding gently paced choice. Both give their landscapes a persuasive role in reconsidering the life left behind. Local Hero offers humour around a coastal property deal; The Horse Whisperer concentrates on recovery and hesitant romance, with performances that cannot quite compensate for its length.
Is The Horse Whisperer based on a true story or a book?
The Horse Whisperer is adapted from Nicholas Evans’s novel, with a screenplay by Richard LaGravenese and Eric Roth. Knowing the book is not necessary to follow the story of recovery and romance. We find the film takes the difficulties of recovery seriously, though its romantic hesitation grows repetitive.
What should I watch after The Horse Whisperer?
After The Horse Whisperer, try Local Hero (1983, Fi1m 86): Another landscape makes a persuasive case for reconsidering the life left behind. Then The Bridges of Madison County (1995, Fi1m 84): An adult romance whose restraint gives ordinary encounters an unusually painful weight.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Black Stallion (1979) · not reviewed yetA boy and a horse build trust through patient, richly visual storytelling.

  2. The Rider (2017) · not reviewed yetHorses, damaged bodies and recovery, with less reassurance and more difficult choices.

  3. Local Hero (1983, Fi1m 86)Another landscape makes a persuasive case for reconsidering the life left behind.

  4. A Summer's Tale (1996) · not reviewed yetFor romantic hesitation observed closely, with conversation doing the work of spectacle.

  5. The Bridges of Madison County (1995, Fi1m 84)An adult romance whose restraint gives ordinary encounters an unusually painful weight.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever