Logan (Hugh Jackman) holds Jean Grey (Famke Janssen) protectively in a laboratory
Film review

X-Men

2000 · Directed by Bryan Singer · 1h 44m · Statens medieråd 15

In a sentenceHugh Jackman appears to have received the character development intended for half the cast

Logan / Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) forms a bond with Rogue (Anna Paquin) in a superhero adventure whose other central figures include Xavier (Patrick Stewart) and the antagonist Magneto (Ian McKellen). Jean Grey (Famke Janssen), Cyclops (James Marsden) and Storm (Halle Berry) are also part of the ensemble. The story brings in Mystique (Rebecca Romijn), Sabretooth (Tyler Mane), Toad (Ray Park) and Senator Kelly (Bruce Davison), with Wolverine and Rogue’s relationship providing a personal connection amid the larger cast and its competing interests.

Fi1m review

Bryan Singer’s uneven superhero film is worth the trouble for Hugh Jackman. Wolverine’s bond with Rogue gives it feeling, but a crowded story leaves much of the cast waiting for something to do.

Bryan Singer’s X-Men is a decent superhero film with a crowded story and several actors who deserve more room. It earns an evening if the genre appeals, chiefly because Hugh Jackman gives Wolverine enough personality to make us want to follow him. David Hayter’s screenplay has a great many people to establish, and too often establishing them is all it manages. At 104 minutes, the film moves briskly, but it leaves us wishing that fewer characters had been invited.

Jackman’s intensity makes Wolverine interesting even when the story is busy elsewhere. He brings irritation as well as conviction, and the humour allows him to be difficult without becoming tiresome. We were moved by Wolverine’s bond with Rogue: Anna Paquin gives his performance someone to respond to, and their connection makes the dangers feel less anonymous. Singer allows these two enough attention for us to care about them, a courtesy the rest of the cast receives unevenly.

Patrick Stewart’s Xavier and Ian McKellen’s Magneto help make the film’s seriousness bearable. They give the material authority without suggesting that we ought to be grateful for it, and McKellen lets us understand the attraction of a character who could have been a routine antagonist. His performance leaves room for sympathy, which makes him worth listening to. Stewart is a steady presence, although the pleasure of watching these actors can disguise how much work they are doing for the writing.

Newton Thomas Sigel’s cinematography is effective at holding our attention on the actors; the action makes a less consistent impression. The effects are often persuasive, but they do not guarantee excitement when the people involved have barely registered. John Myhre’s production design gives the film a convincing physical setting, though few of its spaces stay with us as clearly as Jackman’s presence does. The images support Singer’s serious approach without providing much extra pleasure when the story begins to hurry.

Famke Janssen’s Jean Grey, James Marsden’s Cyclops and Halle Berry’s Storm are the clearest casualties of that hurry. All three need more than the screenplay finds for them, particularly when the film asks us to accept them as an ensemble worth investing in. We wanted more time with these characters before the action required our concern. Jackman is given enough opportunity to seem contradictory and human, which makes the thinness of the surrounding roles harder to overlook.

Editors Kevin Stitt, John Wright and Steven Rosenblum keep things moving, but speed cannot solve the problem of fitting this many people into one story. The film can feel as though it is getting through introductions rather than developing relationships. Michael Kamen’s music lends the action urgency, though it does little to distinguish passages that are already struggling to hold our interest. There are effective superhero set-pieces here, separated by stretches in which the film’s abundance of characters becomes tiring.

A superhero ensemble ought to make us interested in more than its most forceful member. X-Men manages that with Rogue, Xavier and Magneto, then struggles to extend the courtesy much further. Too much still feels like preparation for a fuller film, and a newcomer should not have to supply enthusiasm in advance. See it for Jackman, provided you can forgive how little attention several of his colleagues receive.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

60
Positive
2
Mixed
4
Negative
2

The reviews lean towards a mixed reception, with praise clustering around the cast rather than the storytelling. Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine earns approval for his intensity and charisma, while Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen bring weight to the material. Even less enthusiastic critics find something human in Wolverine, particularly his bond with Rogue. The more favourable accounts also praise the humour, effects and superhero set-pieces, finding an entertaining adaptation despite the crowded story.

The spread is wide, though two of the eight reviews have no accessible verdict text, limiting the picture. Reservations centre on too much material, loose plotting and characters who need more development. Total Film sees a promising opening give way to an incomplete franchise introduction; the Evening Standard finds the provocative themes insufficient compensation for the lack of excitement. Action is another dividing point: Eye for Film finds it limp, despite admiring Jackman and McKellen.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Colin Kennedy
85*

The critic finds the film surprisingly good and an effective start to the franchise. They praise Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine and the gravitas Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen bring to the story.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
14 July 2000 · Kenneth Turan
70*

Turan finds the film an accomplished, entertaining adaptation, though it packs too much into its brisk running time. He especially praises Hugh Jackman’s intensity as Wolverine and the film’s self-aware humor, which helps its effects land.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
14 July 2000
64*

The page does not expose the critic’s verdict. It provides no accessible details about what the review praised or criticized.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TJ
64*

The page identifies this as a film review, but its verdict cannot be determined from the available text. No praise or complaint is accessible because the review body is absent.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Andrew Collins
60

Collins presents it as a dark, effective superhero film. He particularly praises its special effects.

Read the full review →
Total Film
18 August 2000 · ★★★ · Total Film
60

The review finds the film promising at first but increasingly unfocused, leaving it feeling like an incomplete franchise opener. It praises the strong characters and well-executed superhero set-pieces, while criticizing the plot holes and underdeveloped supporting characters.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is X-Men worth watching?
X-Men is worth watching for superhero fans interested in Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine, though its crowded story keeps our score at 67. We find feeling in his bond with Anna Paquin’s Rogue, but several other characters receive little beyond an introduction, and the action is uneven.
How long is X-Men, and what is it rated?
X-Men runs 1h 44m and is rated 15 by the Statens medieråd in Sweden. It is an adventure and action film.
Where can I watch X-Men in Sweden?
X-Men is streaming on Disney+ in Sweden, and it is also available to rent from Apple TV from kr 39.00. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is X-Men, and is it suitable for children?
X-Men carries a UK 12 certificate, so it is better suited to teenagers than younger children. That rating is the clearest guide here: we note superhero action and characters facing danger, but cannot offer a more specific warning about violence or frightening material.
How does X-Men compare to X-Men: Days of Future Past?
X-Men is the less consistently entertaining choice beside X-Men: Days of Future Past, but its bond between Wolverine and Rogue gives it feeling. We prefer the later film’s playful action and stronger use of its actors, though its character history can be cumbersome; the earlier film spends more time on introductions than developing its ensemble.
What should I watch after X-Men?
After X-Men, try The Iron Giant (1999, Fi1m 88): A wary friendship gives another science-fiction outsider story its warmth and purpose. Then Unbreakable (2000, Fi1m 81): For superhero powers treated as a personal problem rather than a celebration; and Akira (1988, Fi1m 83): Young people with frightening powers, with considerably less faith in adult supervision.
What order should I watch the X-Men films in?
Release order is the safe choice for X-Men, and it is the order our collection page lists them in. X-Men is the first of the 4 X-Men titles on Fi1m; after it X2. The full order.

Part of · 1 of 4

X-Men

4 films on Fi1m · 2000–2014 · average 70 · best X2 80

All 4 in order

Cast

Awards

Hugo Awards, 2001

Nominated
Best Dramatic Presentation

MTV Movie Award for Best Movie, 2001

Nominated
MTV Movie Award for Best Movie

MTV Movie Award for Best On-Screen Duo, 2001

Nominated
MTV Movie Award for Best On-Screen Duo

Nebula Award for Best Script, 2001

Nominated
Nebula Award for Best Script

Saturn Awards, 2001

Won
Best Actor
Won
Best Costume
Won
Best Director
Won
Best Science Fiction Film

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Iron Giant (1999, Fi1m 88)A wary friendship gives another science-fiction outsider story its warmth and purpose.

  2. Unbreakable (2000, Fi1m 81)For superhero powers treated as a personal problem rather than a celebration.

  3. Akira (1988, Fi1m 83)Young people with frightening powers, with considerably less faith in adult supervision.

  4. The Devil's Backbone (2001) · not reviewed yetAnother genre story that takes vulnerable outsiders and their loyalties seriously.

  5. Midnight Special (2016) · not reviewed yetA child’s unusual abilities matter chiefly because someone wants to protect him.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever