Céline (Julie Delpy) and Jesse (Ethan Hawke) walking on a wooden platform in the city
Film review

Before Sunrise

1995 · Directed by Richard Linklater · 1h 41m · MPA R

In a sentenceTwo strangers talk all night, and for once we would rather listen than get some sleep

Jesse (Ethan Hawke) and Céline (Julie Delpy) meet on a train and spend a night wandering through Vienna. Both are young travellers, and neither knows the other beyond what they choose to say as they walk. Conversation becomes their way of testing an attraction, with stretches of talk giving way to moments when neither says much at all. Richard Linklater directs from a screenplay written with Kim Krizan, keeping the story with the pair as they get to know someone who, until the train journey, was a stranger.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Richard Linklater makes a night of conversation feel absorbing and unexpectedly tender. Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy give the romance its awkward life, though the talk occasionally sounds too pleased with its own intelligence.

Richard Linklater’s Before Sunrise is a funny, affecting romance that earns our interest in two people by letting them talk. The story stays with Jesse and Céline, who meet on a train and spend a night wandering through Vienna. We recommend it warmly, with a warning for anyone who needs a plot to keep changing direction. It helps that Linklater understands how much effort goes into sounding spontaneous.

The screenplay, written by Linklater and Kim Krizan, gives the conversation the awkwardness of people trying to be interesting without seeming to try. Their opinions matter because each wants to know what the other makes of them. We listen partly for what they think, but also for the impression they hope to make. That keeps even the more expansive stretches from sounding like a discussion that could have happened between any two strangers.

Ethan Hawke’s Jesse and Julie Delpy’s Céline are persuasive because neither performer treats attraction as something that removes embarrassment. They make the effort of getting acquainted visible even when the conversation seems easy. We felt unexpectedly nervous for them when the talking gave way to silence. After all that apparent confidence, simply being together without a subject to discuss suddenly looks difficult. Those wordless moments make us care about them more than another clever exchange would.

Lee Daniel’s cinematography makes the listener worth watching even during the more fluent stretches of conversation. We keep looking for the small signs that a remark has landed differently from how it was meant. Sheri Galloway and Sandra Adair’s editing gives the exchanges room without making every pause seem momentous. The relaxed pace works because a change in the pair’s ease with each other can be enough to move a scene along.

Florian Reichmann’s production design helps Vienna feel hospitable to this aimless evening, a place where lingering seems a reasonable thing to do. The city is a flattering setting for their freedom from ordinary obligations, and the film makes no great effort to disguise that. Fred Frith’s music stays modest beside the conversation. That restraint works: we can attend to the changes in the speakers’ voices without being told how much each exchange should matter.

There are stretches when their self-consciousness becomes wearing. Linklater and Krizan occasionally let a line sound too pleased with its own intelligence, and an exchange can continue after we have grasped what each person is trying to communicate. Anyone irritated by young people working out what they think in public will find some of this hard going. The film’s freedom from practical worries is part of its pleasure, though it makes the evening feel a little protected.

Yet a romance is allowed an unusually fortunate meeting, and this one is attentive to the uncertainty that survives good luck. Across its 101 minutes, it gives embarrassment and curiosity time that a more hurried courtship would spend on complications. The modest scale feels right for the people in it. Make time for it when conversation is what you want from an evening, rather than something to talk over.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

82
Positive
12
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics are won over, and the praise clusters on the talk. Reviews describe the dialogue between Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy as witty, perceptive and lifelike, and several credit Richard Linklater with making a single night of wandering Vienna feel like a story rather than an exercise. The chemistry of the two leads comes up in nearly every notice, and most treat the film’s refusal to tie things up neatly as a strength rather than an evasion.

Reservations are few and mild, and the spread is narrow. The one mixed notice is Variety, where Todd McCarthy finds the premise appealing but the constant conversation and repeated settings wearing, and rates Delpy’s performance well above Hawke’s. The Los Angeles Times and The Independent are warmer but call the film minor or risky, enjoying the talk without being swept away. The most recent reviews are among the warmest, which suggests its standing has risen since 1995.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Caroline Westbrook
90*

Linklater's intelligent, witty and poignant tale breathes new life into the romance genre with believable characters and a script that crackles with wit and wisdom. It is too intelligent to be soppy and too damn good to be ignored, feeding the mind as well as warming the heart.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
30 January 2025 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

The critic calls it a romance rather than a romcom or romantic drama, a brief encounter that feels like a strange and wonderful miracle without being cloying. They single out the film's elegant handling of unresolved sexual tension and the lightness with which the characters float through Vienna free from everyday cares.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
23 January 1995 · Anthony Lane
90*

The review celebrates the film's odd, improvised-feeling structure of two strangers wandering and talking through Vienna, defying conventional plot rules. It singles out the strong performances by the leads that emerge from this open, bemused style.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
27 January 1995 · Janet Maslin
90*

The critic praises the film's capture of two young travelers' instant connection and free-flowing conversations during one night in Vienna. It highlights the director's skill in crafting fanciful yet lifelike dialogue that feels universal.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · GA
90*

The critic praises the film's ability to convey emotional truths through conversation between the leads, calling it a funny, poignant, perceptive brilliant gem.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
16 June 2025 · Jess Furseth
85*

The critic praises the film's intimate focus on two characters giving each other undivided attention during a single night in Vienna. The piece highlights how the lack of modern distractions enhances the emotional connection and timeless appeal of the romance.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Before Sunrise worth watching?
Before Sunrise is worth watching for anyone who wants an evening of conversation rather than plot, and we scored it 89. Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy make two strangers getting acquainted in Vienna funny and unexpectedly tender. It is not for viewers who need the story to keep changing direction, and the talk occasionally sounds too pleased with itself.
How long is Before Sunrise, and what is it rated?
Before Sunrise runs 1h 41m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a drama and romance film.
Where can I watch Before Sunrise in the US?
Before Sunrise is streaming on The Roku Channel and Tubi in the US. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Before Sunrise, and is it suitable for children?
Before Sunrise is a 15 certificate in the UK and an R in the US, and it is made for adults rather than children. There is nothing violent or frightening in it that we can point to; the film is a night of two young travellers talking and walking. The certificate reflects adult conversation and an adult romance, not anything alarming on screen.
How does Before Sunrise compare to Brief Encounter?
Before Sunrise and Brief Encounter are both romances built on a chance meeting, but the earlier film is the more fearful and the better of the two. Linklater's pair are free of ordinary obligations and mostly free of embarrassment about being seen together; David Lean's lovers are not, and their anxiety gives his film a weight the Vienna night does not attempt. Choose Linklater for warmth, Lean for something that hurts.
What should I watch after Before Sunrise?
After Before Sunrise, try Brief Encounter (1945, Fi1m 90): Another chance meeting, with less freedom and more fear of being seen. Then My Night at Maud's (1969, Fi1m 81): Personal principles become harder to defend when an attractive stranger is listening; and In the Mood for Love (2000, Fi1m 91): For the glances and hesitations, with fewer words and stricter social limits.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Brief Encounter (1945, Fi1m 90)Another chance meeting, with less freedom and more fear of being seen.

  2. My Night at Maud's (1969, Fi1m 81)Personal principles become harder to defend when an attractive stranger is listening.

  3. In the Mood for Love (2000, Fi1m 91)For the glances and hesitations, with fewer words and stricter social limits.

  4. Weekend (2011, Fi1m 86)Two men get acquainted, with frank talk and limited time together.

  5. The Lunchbox (2013, Fi1m 75)An accidental correspondence gives two lonely people room to speak honestly.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever