Film review

Doctor Dolittle

1967 · Directed by Richard Fleischer · 2h 31m · MPA G

In a sentenceRex Harrison spends two and a half hours talking to the animals, and only the parrot seems to be listening

FamilyComedyFantasyAdventure

Puddleby-on-the-Marsh, England, in Victorian times. Dr. John Dolittle (Rex Harrison) has given up human patients for animal ones, having learned their languages from his parrot, Polynesia, and his house is full of them: a dog, a pig, a duck, a chimpanzee. Matthew Mugg (Anthony Newley), who sells cat’s meat, and the boy Tommy Stubbins (William Dix) bring him an injured duck and stay to watch. Emma Fairfax (Samantha Eggar) arrives to complain that he has fitted her uncle General Bellowes’s (Peter Bull) horse with spectacles. What Dolittle wants is a voyage to find the Great Pink Sea Snail; what he lacks is money. So when a two-headed llama, the Pushmi-Pullyu, is delivered to his door, he takes it to Albert Blossom’s (Richard Attenborough) circus to earn the fare, and his troubles with the law begin.

Fi1m review

Richard Fleischer’s musical has handsome sets, a working menagerie and Rex Harrison at his driest, and it runs 151 minutes on the strength of one good song. Children may be enchanted; the adults beside them will check the time.

Doctor Dolittle arrived in the wake of Mary Poppins (1964), when every studio wanted a family musical with an English setting, a star from the West End and a running time that justified the price of a reserved seat. Richard Fleischer’s version of Hugh Lofting’s books has all three. It also has a working menagerie, a two-headed llama, a giant snail you can sail in, and Rex Harrison in a top hat. What it does not have is much reason to last 151 minutes, and by the end we were counting them.

Harrison is the reason to stay. He plays Dolittle as he played Henry Higgins in My Fair Lady (1964), talking his way through the songs in that clipped, amused voice and treating the lyrics as remarks he has just thought of. He never condescends to the animals or to the joke. When a parrot tells him what is wrong with a horse, he listens as a doctor listens, head tilted, and then prescribes spectacles. ‘Talk to the Animals’ is the one Leslie Bricusse tune anybody left humming, and Harrison delivers it while feeding a duck. We smiled through the whole of it, and at little else afterwards.

Mario Chiari builds Puddleby-on-the-Marsh as a postcard, stone cottages, a small harbour, a doctor’s house with a creature on every surface, and Robert L. Surtees photographs it in wide, evenly lit frames that let you count the animals. There are a great many to count. A seal in a shawl and bonnet, a chimpanzee who helps about the house, a pig under the table, and the Pushmi-Pullyu, two performers in a llama suit facing opposite ways, which is funnier the longer you look at it. Ray Aghayan puts Harrison in a frock coat that never gets dirty and Samantha Eggar in crinolines the colour of boiled sweets. The money is on the screen and it looks like money.

The circus stretch is the film’s second best. Richard Attenborough plays Albert Blossom, the proprietor, as a man who has spent thirty years being unsurprised and has just been surprised, and his single number, sung at the Pushmi-Pullyu, has more energy than the rest of the score put together. He is in the film for perhaps ten minutes. We noticed how much we missed him once he had gone.

Then the film sets sail and the trouble starts. Bricusse’s songs are the weak part: pleasant, wordy, short of tunes, and there are a dozen of them, each stopping the story for three minutes to explain a feeling the previous scene had already made clear. Anthony Newley’s Matthew Mugg sings most of the worst ones, in an Irish accent and with a wink, and he wears out his welcome before the first hour is up. Eggar’s Emma Fairfax is written as a scold who comes round, and the script gives her nothing to do between the two states except glare at Harrison from under a bonnet. Samuel E. Beetley and Marjorie Fowler are credited as editors, and the film’s length suggests they lost every argument. Somewhere on the voyage, watching the ship pitch about in what is plainly a tank while the cast waited for the water to settle, we were bored, and then we were irritated at being bored by something on which so much care had been spent.

Fleischer was a director of lean thrillers. The Narrow Margin (1952) does not waste a minute, and Fantastic Voyage (1966) kept a whole crew inside a human body without losing track of anyone. Here he seems to have been told to make everything larger and slower, and he obeyed. The camera sits back, the numbers run their full length, and the animals, who cannot be directed, do what they like, so that several scenes end in a scramble of fur and feathers with nobody in charge. Geoffrey Holder turns up late as William Shakespeare X and is the only person after Attenborough who looks pleased to be there.

A child of eight will forgive most of this for the seal and the snail, and the U certificate is honest. Adults should sit next to the child and borrow the goodwill. Harrison, the animals and Attenborough’s ten minutes are worth about an hour of anybody’s evening; the film has another ninety and no clear idea what to do with them.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

60
Positive
2
Mixed
1
Negative
1

With only 4 reviews in so far, the picture is split down the middle and divides by era. The two contemporary notices are warm: Variety admires Rex Harrison’s performance and Leslie Bricusse’s songs, and The New Yorker reports that children love it. The later reassessments are cooler. Empire finds a genial but overlong diversion with flat songs and slapstick animal scenes, and Time Out goes further, finding no dramatic shape across the long runtime and weak supporting performances, while allowing that the songs and live animals appeal to the young. Length is the complaint the later critics share.

Variety
31 December 1966 · Variety Staff
80*

The critic praises Rex Harrison's histrionically perfect performance as Doctor Dolittle and Leslie Bricusse's adaptation and music, which suit the scenario well despite no smash hits. Notes the high production values evident in the expensive film.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
23 December 1967 · Brendan Gill
75*

The review describes the film as one for the young and recounts an eleven-year-old companion awarding it 98 out of 100 points, with only minor demerits for one corny science-fiction scene at the end.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
55*

The film emerges as an adequate genial diversion despite being overly lengthy. It relies on flat songs and good animatronics while animal scenes often descend into chaotic slapstick.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · TJ
30*

The critic finds the lavish musical lacking in dramatic shape over its long runtime and criticizes the supporting performances, while noting the songs and live-animal spectacle have some appeal for young viewers. Overall the piece expresses sympathy for the troubled production and crew.

Read the full review →

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1968

Nominated
Best Cinematography
Nominated
Best Film Editing
Nominated
Best Original Score
Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Production Design
Nominated
Best Score, Adaptation or Treatment
Nominated
Best Sound
Won
Best Special Effects

If you liked this, try…