A racer in a white suit stands beside a Formula One car at sunset
Film review

F1

2025 · Directed by Joseph Kosinski · 2h 36m · RO 12

In a sentenceThe cars are real, the speed is real, and every line of dialogue could be read off a sponsor’s hoarding

Sonny Hayes (Brad Pitt) was a Formula One driver until a crash ended his career, and has spent the decades since racing whatever will have him. His former teammate Ruben Cervantes (Javier Bardem) now owns APXGP, a team at the bottom of the grid and in danger of being sold, and persuades Sonny to come back for one season alongside the rookie Joshua Pearce (Damson Idris), who does not think he needs a partner. Kate McKenna (Kerry Condon) is the technical director trying to make their car competitive while the two drivers argue. Joseph Kosinski directs from a screenplay by Ehren Kruger; Lewis Hamilton is among the producers. It runs 156 minutes and carries a 12A.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Joseph Kosinski puts a camera inside a real Formula One car and the racing is as thrilling as any we have seen on screen. Everything between the races is a sports film we have watched a dozen times, with better tailoring and a longer running time.

Joseph Kosinski directed Top Gun: Maverick, in which an ageing man in a fast machine taught a younger man to be less careful. F1 is the same film with the sky taken out. Sonny Hayes (Brad Pitt) is a driver whose Formula One career ended in a crash decades ago and who has driven whatever will have him since. His old teammate Ruben Cervantes (Javier Bardem) now owns APXGP, the worst team on the grid, and asks him back for one season to partner the rookie Joshua Pearce (Damson Idris). The racing here is as good as any we have seen. The rest is a sports film we have watched many times before, and at 156 minutes we had time to notice.

Claudio Miranda, who also shot Maverick, fixes his cameras to the cars themselves, and the difference is plain in the first lap. The camera sits at the driver’s shoulder and the track comes at us in a grey smear with the kerbs snapping past on either side; when a car goes off, the world tips and we tip with it. Patrick J. Smith and Stephen Mirrione cut between cockpit, pit wall and helicopter at a rate that ought to be confusing and mostly is not, because they hold each onboard shot just long enough for us to feel the corner. The first full race had us leaning forward with our hands gripped together, and we do not follow the sport. It does this several times.

Hans Zimmer keeps his score to a low pulse under the engines and lets them do the talking; his big themes arrive between races, where there is less to compete with. Mark Tildesley and Ben Munro build the APXGP garage in black carbon and blue screens, always a little untidy, so it reads as a team that cannot afford its neighbours’ polish. Julian Day covers everyone in sponsor logos, as the sport requires, and puts Pitt in jeans and denim off duty so that he looks like a man who has wandered in from an older film.

Pitt plays it that way, loose and amused, doing his slow grin at anyone who tells him he cannot do something. It is a star performance rather than an acting one, and well judged for what this is. Idris has the harder part, a young man told he is the future and then told he is doing it wrong, and he plays the sulk and the pride without asking to be liked too soon. Bardem gives Ruben warmth and a permanent look of financial worry. Kerry Condon, as the technical director Kate McKenna, gives the most precise performance in the film and is asked to do the least with it: she designs the car, and then a man arrives to tell her about the car. Tobias Menzies watches from the hospitality suite as a board member with opinions.

The trouble is Ehren Kruger’s screenplay, which has one scene and writes it many times. Somebody tells Sonny he is too old. Somebody tells Joshua he is too young. Sonny says the car is not the point and then drives the car. Between these, the film relies on television commentary to tell us what we have just watched, a crutch in a drama. Around the ninety-minute mark the film starts swapping races for montages of them, drivers and crowds and podiums going by in a few seconds each, and our attention slipped. It came back. The pattern did not stop.

It is also, and nobody pretends otherwise, an advert. The film was shot at real Grand Prix weekends among the real teams, Lewis Hamilton is one of its producers, and no team boss ever says anything a sponsor would mind. This does not spoil the races. It does mean that when the film reaches for something about age and second chances, the reach is cautious, because the brand has to come out of the crash intact.

Maverick told a nearly identical story and knew when to stop talking. This one belongs in a cinema, on the largest screen we can find; the onboard shots need the size and the engines need the volume. At home the races shrink to something we might have caught on a Sunday afternoon, and the dialogue does not improve.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

68
Positive
11
Mixed
4
Negative
2

Most critics agree on what works: the racing. Nearly every review, favourable or not, praises the on-track sequences, the cameras mounted in the cars and Joseph Kosinski’s handling of speed, and several single out Brad Pitt’s ease in the lead and Damson Idris opposite him. The Guardian adds Kerry Condon as the strongest support.

The reservations cluster just as tightly. Off the track the story is called formulaic almost everywhere, a rerun of Top Gun: Maverick in Radio Times’s view, and many reviews note how openly the film doubles as an advert for Formula One. The spread is moderate rather than wide: most land somewhere between warm and indulgent, with a handful going further. The Times calls it the corniest sports film yet and Digital Spy finds it an empty spectacle with an unlikeable lead. Variety is the rare dissenter on the racing itself, finding the sequences fragmentary and at times confusing.

Empire
17 June 2025 · Sophie Butcher
85*

The critic praises the immersive racing sequences achieved with groundbreaking cameras and real F1 access, highlighting Kosinski's direction and the authentic depiction of the sport, while noting the plot outside races is somewhat formulaic. Verdict is highly positive, recommending it on the biggest screen.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
17 June 2025 · 4/4/4 · Adam Woodward
80

The review hails it as a thrilling, entertaining dad movie with Brad Pitt in top form, but acknowledges it as a seductive PR exercise for the sport.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
17 June 2025 · Lovia Gyarkye
80*

The critic praises the film's thrilling race sequences and how it embeds the fictional story in real F1 events, highlighting the performances of Brad Pitt and Damson Idris and the authentic feel of the racing drama.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
27 June 2025 · Christina Newland
80*

The review calls it a triumph as an elaborate advert for F1, praising the realism, stunt driving, and balanced rivalry, but notes the swaggering hero trope is tired; overall positive verdict on its spectacle and entertainment value.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
17 June 2025
80*

The critic describes it as rousing, sleek entertainment with thrilling action scenes and a charming lead, though not quite reaching the heights of Top Gun: Maverick. It succeeds through brilliant execution despite being a branded brand-extension exercise.

Read the full review →
Time Out
18 June 2025 · ★★★★ · Phil de Semlyen
80

It praises the rip-roaring thrills, spectacle, and Pitt's charisma in a full-throttle sports movie triumph, despite clichéd elements.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is F1 worth watching?
F1 is worth watching for the racing alone, and we scored it 66. Joseph Kosinski puts cameras inside real Formula One cars and the onboard footage is as good as any we have seen, but Ehren Kruger’s script repeats one scene many times across 156 minutes. See it on the largest screen available; at home the races shrink and the dialogue does not improve.
How long is F1, and what is it rated?
F1 runs 2h 36m and is rated 12 by the RO in Romania. It is an action and drama film.
Where can I watch F1 in Romania?
F1 is available to buy from Amazon Prime Video from lei 53.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is F1, and is it suitable for children?
F1 is a 12A, and its violence is confined to racing crashes: cars go off the track and the camera tips with them, and the certificate implies nothing beyond that. There is no gore in the review’s account and nothing designed to frighten. Older children who can sit through 156 minutes should be fine; the sponsor-heavy dialogue is more likely to bore them than the crashes are to upset them.
How does F1 compare to Rush?
F1 has the better racing and Rush has the better drama. Kosinski’s onboard cameras put us in the cockpit in a way Ron Howard’s film does not, but Rush gives Hunt and Lauda a rivalry that matters, while F1 keeps telling its two drivers they are too old or too young. Choose Rush for a story; choose F1 for a big screen and loud engines.
What should I watch after F1?
After F1, try Rush (2013, Fi1m 82): Hunt against Lauda, two men who hated each other and needed each other; the drama earns the racing. Then Senna (2010, Fi1m 84): A documentary built from race footage; no actor could have played him better; and Days of Thunder (1990, Fi1m 61): The Bruckheimer template this film is built on, louder and less embarrassed about it.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Rush (2013, Fi1m 82)Hunt against Lauda, two men who hated each other and needed each other; the drama earns the racing.

  2. Grand Prix (1966) · not reviewed yetFrankenheimer bolted cameras to the cars sixty years ago and the results still hold.

  3. Senna (2010, Fi1m 84)A documentary built from race footage; no actor could have played him better.

  4. Le Mans (1971) · not reviewed yetSteve McQueen, almost no dialogue, and a film content simply to watch cars go round.

  5. Days of Thunder (1990, Fi1m 61)The Bruckheimer template this film is built on, louder and less embarrassed about it.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever