Dina, Greg, Bernie, Roz, and Pam react as Jack crouches beside a child in the living room
Film review

Meet the Fockers

2004 · Directed by Jay Roach · 1h 55m · Kijkwijzer 6

In a sentenceDustin Hoffman and Barbra Streisand do the entertaining while the jokes wear out their welcome

Greg Focker (Ben Stiller), Jack Byrnes (Robert De Niro), Bernie Focker (Dustin Hoffman) and Rozalin Focker (Barbra Streisand) lead a romantic comedy of escalating embarrassment. Pam Byrnes (Teri Polo) and Dina Byrnes (Blythe Danner) join the ensemble, alongside Kevin Rawley (Owen Wilson). Awkward exchanges give way to broader physical indignities as the characters struggle to preserve their dignity. Also involved are Isabel Villalobos (Alanna Ubach), Jorge Villalobos (Ray Santiago) and Officer LeFlore (Tim Blake Nelson), as the comedy moves between clashing temperaments and repeated humiliation.

Fi1m review

Dustin Hoffman and Barbra Streisand bring warmth to a comedy that keeps mistaking further humiliation for another joke. The cast provide scattered pleasures, but Jay Roach allows too much repetition and too much time between laughs.

Jay Roach’s Meet the Fockers is an intermittently funny comedy stretched well beyond what its jokes can support. There are scattered pleasures, but 115 minutes is a long commitment for material this repetitive. It keeps returning to humiliation, with increasingly crude gags expected to provide the extra laughs. Dustin Hoffman and Barbra Streisand make the strongest case for staying, largely because their performances have a warmth that survives the effort around them.

The main pleasure is Dustin Hoffman as Bernie Focker. His good-natured mischief gives the broad comedy an ease it otherwise struggles to find, particularly opposite Robert De Niro as Jack Byrnes. We laughed at their exchanges. The contrast between one actor’s buoyancy and the other’s heavy reactions gives the scenes some momentum without requiring another outrageous gag. Robert De Niro’s more exaggerated responses can become tiresome, but the pairing occasionally makes that excess useful.

Barbra Streisand as Rozalin Focker is similarly welcome, taking her time with material that other performances seem anxious to sell. Her relaxed delivery allows a joke to arrive without quite so much insistence on its arrival. Ben Stiller, playing Greg Focker, has less opportunity to surprise us, and the repetition matters more whenever the attention returns to him. A comic lead needs something beyond another variation on discomfort, however accomplished the actor may be at supplying it.

The trouble lies mainly with Jim Herzfeld and John Hamburg’s screenplay. Crude jokes can be funny, but they need fresh details and some sense of when to stop. Here, the promise of further humiliation too often substitutes for a new comic idea, and Jay Roach pushes the reactions harder when a scene needs a better reason to continue. The good-natured stretches make this especially frustrating, because the cast can plainly hold our attention without another escalation.

John Schwartzman’s cinematography keeps attention on the actors, a sensible choice when they provide most of the amusement. Rusty Smith’s production design does its job without supplying much additional comic interest; we rarely find ourselves enjoying the surroundings while waiting for a joke to improve. Randy Newman’s music encourages us to take the proceedings in good humour, although it cannot make the weaker material any more inviting. These are serviceable contributions to a film whose problems begin with what the performers are asked to do.

Lee Haxall, Alan Baumgarten and Jon Poll’s editing does too little to reduce that wait. Too many comic situations continue after their possibilities are clear, leaving time for us to anticipate an indignity and then wait for it to happen. In this kind of family farce, that is a serious weakness: surprise is part of the laugh, and repetition needs careful timing. A brisker film might have made the same material easier to enjoy, even without finding anything new to do with it.

There is enough good humour here to make us wish the film were less determined to be outrageous. Those especially fond of Dustin Hoffman or Barbra Streisand will find their patience rewarded in patches. We would save it for an evening when their names alone are enough of an invitation.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

48
Positive
2
Mixed
4
Negative
5

The consensus on Meet the Fockers leans towards disappointment, though most critics find something to enjoy in the performances. Dustin Hoffman attracts the most consistent praise for his energy and good-natured mischief, while Barbra Streisand earns credit for making broad comedy feel relaxed. Even several unfavourable reviews find that the pair provide welcome amusement. The recurring distinction is between a cast that can still raise laughs and material that gives them too little fresh work to do.

The reviews differ sharply on how far those performances carry the sequel. Total Film finds an entertaining comedy, particularly in Hoffman’s chemistry with Robert De Niro; The AV Club sees a lazy retread that wastes its cast. Reservations centre on recycled humiliation, strained gross-out gags and repetition. De Niro also divides opinion: The Guardian credits him with keeping the film watchable, while Slant Magazine objects to his mugging.

Total Film
28 January 2005 · ★★★★ · Total Film
80

The review finds the sequel entertaining, despite some jokes falling flat. It singles out the all-star cast’s exuberant performances, especially the chemistry between Hoffman and De Niro.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
22 December 2004 · John Hazelton
64*

The visible page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. The paywall also hides what the review singles out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
63*

The page identifies a review, but its contents are unavailable. The critic’s verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be verified.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Andrew Collins
60

Collins finds the sequel entertaining, though some elements rely too heavily on the original. He praises Dustin Hoffman and Barbra Streisand for stealing the film with their broad comic performances.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
22 December 2004 · ★★/4 · Nick Schager
50

Schager finds the sequel intermittently funny but mostly flat and redundant. He praises Dustin Hoffman’s good-natured comic performance, while criticizing the film’s strained outrageous gags and Robert De Niro’s mugging.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
35*

The review finds the sequel a disappointing retread, with only occasional amusement. It praises Hoffman and Streisand for enlivening their roles but says the strong cast is largely wasted on underdeveloped comedy.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Meet the Fockers worth watching?
Meet the Fockers offers scattered laughs rather than a firm recommendation; we score it 52 out of 100, with Dustin Hoffman and Barbra Streisand providing the strongest reasons to watch. Their warmth rewards patient admirers, but the repeated humiliation and long waits between jokes make its 115 minutes feel overgenerous.
How long is Meet the Fockers, and what is it rated?
Meet the Fockers runs 1h 55m and is rated 6 by the Kijkwijzer in the Netherlands. It is a comedy and romance film.
Where can I watch Meet the Fockers in the Netherlands?
Meet the Fockers is not on any streaming or rental service in the Netherlands at the moment. It is available in 10 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is Meet the Fockers, and is it suitable for children?
Meet the Fockers carries a UK 12 certificate, and its crude jokes, repeated humiliation and broad physical indignities make it a more appropriate choice for teenagers than younger children. We would flag embarrassment and adult humour as the main considerations; our review gives no indication that violence or fear is a significant concern.
How does Meet the Fockers compare to The Wedding Banquet?
Meet the Fockers is the weaker choice beside The Wedding Banquet, which we recommend for its funnier, more tender treatment of parental expectations and wedding deception. Both lean into broad farce, but The Wedding Banquet gives family pressures more weight; Meet the Fockers relies heavily on repeated embarrassment, softened by Hoffman and Streisand.
What should I watch after Meet the Fockers?
After Meet the Fockers, try The Wedding Banquet (1993, Fi1m 81): A wedding deception gives parental expectations sharper consequences and considerably more tenderness. Then Toni Erdmann (2016, Fi1m 86): An embarrassing father makes for a more patient, unsettling and moving comedy.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The In-Laws (1979) · not reviewed yetIncompatible prospective in-laws get sharper jokes and a more inventive escalation.

  2. La Cage aux Folles (1978) · not reviewed yetAnother parental meeting turns respectability into a frantic and much funnier performance.

  3. The Wedding Banquet (1993, Fi1m 81)A wedding deception gives parental expectations sharper consequences and considerably more tenderness.

  4. Death at a Funeral (2007) · not reviewed yetFamily decorum collapses under absurd pressure, with firmer control of the chaos.

  5. Toni Erdmann (2016, Fi1m 86)An embarrassing father makes for a more patient, unsettling and moving comedy.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever