Film review

Munich

2005 · Directed by Steven Spielberg · 2h 44m · MPA R

In a sentenceWe spent far too much time hoping an assassination would go to plan

DramaHistoryThriller

After eleven Israeli athletes are murdered at the 1972 Munich Olympics, an Israeli hit squad sets out on a mission of retaliation. Eric Bana plays Avner, an assassin whose work draws him into questions about violence, duty and the defence of home. Around him are Steve (Daniel Craig), Carl (Ciarán Hinds), Robert (Mathieu Kassovitz) and Hans (Hanns Zischler). As the mission proceeds, the men have to reckon with what carrying out revenge demands of them. Steven Spielberg directs a thriller about the aftermath of the massacre and the choices made in its name.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Steven Spielberg’s revenge thriller is tense, disturbing and worth the long evening. Eric Bana makes the doubts hurt, even when the screenplay insists on explaining what his performance has already made clear.

Steven Spielberg’s Munich is a gripping, troubling thriller that occasionally talks past the point at which we have understood it. Following the murder of eleven Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics, it follows an Israeli hit squad on a revenge mission. Spielberg wants us to feel the practical urgency of that work and question the belief that another killing will make anyone safer. He is more persuasive when the men are at work than when the screenplay pauses to spell out the consequences.

Eric Bana gives Avner the conviction the film needs if its doubts are going to hurt. He seems committed to the mission, and questioning it takes an effort that Bana makes us feel. There is no reassuring sense that he has been placed among assassins simply to provide the audience with a decent man to follow. The other members of the squad are less involving as individuals, which leaves him carrying a disproportionate amount of our concern for the people doing the killing.

Janusz Kamiński’s grainy photography helps to make the violence feel dirty and immediate. Michael Kahn’s editing keeps the business of an assassination urgent and legible, so that suspense grows from the work itself. We were frightened, then disturbed by how much we wanted the killings to go to plan. Spielberg has made us concentrate on the success of a mission whose justification we ought to be questioning. Kahn gives those sequences enough momentum that we have little time to congratulate ourselves on having reservations.

Rick Carter’s production design makes the period convincing without inviting us to admire the furnishings. John Williams’s music allows grief to register alongside the tension, and we think that restraint is right for a film already so forceful in its action. These contributions matter because the screenplay keeps returning to the defence of home. The film needs us to understand what the men hope to preserve, or its objections to their methods would come too easily.

The problem is the screenplay by Tony Kushner and Eric Roth, which sometimes puts into speeches what Bana has already made us feel. Its concern with home, protection and revenge is serious, but the dialogue can sound too prepared for the discussion it wants us to have afterwards. Some of these exchanges could have been shorter. The effort to consider the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from more than one position is welcome, even when the characters sound appointed to speak for those positions.

As an assassination thriller, Munich is unusually willing to let the work feel exhausting and morally unrewarding. It still relies on our appetite for a well-staged operation, and Spielberg does not pretend that appetite disappears because the subject is grave. We leave the action passages with enough unease to doubt that a cleaner or more efficient mission would solve anything. At 164 minutes, there is time to feel the repetition, even if the length also makes the mission wear on us. Choose it when there is time to sit with the discomfort afterwards.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

76
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
0

Most critics regard Munich as an absorbing, morally serious thriller, with praise clustering around Spielberg’s handling of action and his examination of retaliatory violence. The reviews repeatedly commend its refusal to offer easy answers, finding that the Israeli hit squad’s mission allows for sustained questioning of vengeance, loyalty and the defence of home. Eric Bana’s conflicted assassin draws particular praise, while the tense set-pieces and controlled storytelling give the ethical questions dramatic force.

The reservations concern how clearly those questions are expressed and how much feeling the characters generate. Slant finds the moral exploration sometimes didactic, while Screen Daily praises the pace but considers the politics simplistic. Digital Spy notes confusion and emotional distance. The spread is largely favourable, but Variety offers a sharper dissent, finding the characters uninvolving and the storytelling overlong: the principal disagreement is over whether the moral discussion sustains the thriller or slows it down.

Radio Times
★★★★ · Stella Papamichael
80

Violence begets violence in Spielberg's bold thriller about the Israeli hit squad after the 1972 Munich Olympics massacre. It provides a complex moral framework without sensationalism and resists a pat conclusion while resonating with post-9/11 anxieties.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
21 December 2005 · Scott Tobias
80*

The critic calls Munich an electrifying elucidation of the cycle of violence in the Middle East that speaks to turbulent times. It is praised as a fair and morally dignified film that comes down against all nations and groups that perpetuate violence, with technical bravura and a commanding performance by Eric Bana.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
12 December 2005 · Nick Schager
75*

The critic describes Munich as a tense, thoughtful film that straddles calls for peace and justifications for war while critiquing vigilante measures. It singles out Eric Bana’s portrayal of a conflicted assassin for praise amid the film’s even-handed but sometimes didactic exploration of moral ambiguities.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
12 December 2005
70*

It is a bold move for Spielberg to address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, resulting in a riveting high-octane thriller with elegant storytelling and brisk pacing. The politics ultimately prove simplistic despite strong performances and grainy realism.

Read the full review →
Time Out
24 January 2006 · BW
70*

Spielberg acknowledges that defending family and home can yield destruction and evil. The film illustrates the moral that violence begets violence through dramatic ironies and set-pieces while recognizing the appeal of homicidal spectaculars.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2006 · Ian Nathan

The film is Spielberg’s most difficult but also one of his strongest: morally ambiguous, lean, intelligent and uncompromised, with a brute hardness that confronts terrible events without easy answers.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 2006

Nominated
Best Director
Nominated
Best Film Editing
Nominated
Best Original Score
Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Writing, Adapted Screenplay

If you liked this, try…

The Battle of Algiers poster93

The Battle of Algiers

1966 · Political violence examined through procedures, reprisals and the civilians caught between them

Army of Shadows poster

Army of Shadows

1969 · Clandestine work becomes frighteningly practical, with loyalty offering little comfort

The Conversation poster

The Conversation

1974 · A surveillance expert discovers how difficult it is to keep work impersonal

Paradise Now poster

Paradise Now

2005 · A Palestinian perspective on political killing, with close attention to personal doubt

The Lives of Others poster84

The Lives of Others

2006 · Surveillance, obedience and private conscience, given time to become painfully entangled