Guido Contini (Daniel Day-Lewis) arrives as photographers and admirers crowd around him
Film review

Nine

2009 · Directed by Rob Marshall · 1h 58m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceAll those people who can sing, and we kept wishing they would go back to talking

Guido Contini (Daniel Day-Lewis) is the centre of Nine, a musical drama about a man caught up in his own anxieties and the women around him. Luisa Contini (Marion Cotillard), Carla (Penélope Cruz) and Claudia (Nicole Kidman) share his story, with Lilli (Judi Dench) and Mamma (Sophia Loren) among the other figures in his life. Their encounters alternate with musical numbers, shifting attention between Guido’s private troubles and the women’s feelings. Dialogue gives way to song as the film explores how these characters understand themselves and one another.

Fi1m review

Rob Marshall’s musical keeps interrupting its troubled characters with songs that scarcely deepen them. Marion Cotillard supplies the hurt and anger, but a gifted cast and polished staging cannot make Guido Contini’s troubles absorbing.

Rob Marshall’s Nine has a capable cast and a persistent difficulty getting from a dramatic scene to a song without losing our interest. It is a disappointing musical, occasionally touching when it attends to someone other than Guido Contini. Anthony Minghella and Michael Tolkin’s screenplay asks us to spend a great deal of time considering this man’s troubles, but gives us too little reason to care about them. The performances offer more than the story allows them to do.

Daniel Day-Lewis gives Guido enough humour to suggest why he might hold other people’s attention. There is pleasure in watching an actor find comic possibilities in a character so occupied with his own difficulties, and the performance is less ponderous than the surrounding drama. But charm can only do so much when the same anxieties keep being presented for inspection. After a while we wanted the film to stop asking how Guido felt and give the women more time to answer for themselves.

Marion Cotillard makes Luisa Contini worth that attention. We were moved by her flashes of anger, because they suggest hurt that has lasted longer than the scene we are watching. She makes the feelings clear without making them simple, and gives us someone to care about when the songs have failed to do so. Penélope Cruz also finds poignancy in Carla; these performances persuade us that the women have concerns beyond their usefulness to the man occupying the centre of the film.

Dion Beebe’s cinematography and John Myhre’s production design give the musical numbers a polish that initially makes the stage-bound presentation seem promising. We can see the appeal of letting a performance occupy its own space, apart from the dialogue. Yet the separation soon becomes a problem, because the numbers tell us so little about the people singing them. There is little sense that the characters carry their feelings from the dialogue into the singing.

Wyatt Smith and Claire Simpson’s editing cannot establish a satisfying rhythm between those two parts of the film. Each return to song feels like another interruption, and we begin to anticipate the delay rather than the pleasure. Andrea Guerra’s music does not provide the continuity these transitions need, although the performers can sing and are plainly committed to the material. The deeper difficulty is that so few of the tunes stay with us, leaving the dramatic momentum repeatedly broken for numbers we scarcely remember afterwards.

Fergie’s sequence supplies a welcome burst of energy, and it is worth acknowledging how much more alive the film can feel when a performer takes charge. That pleasure is frustratingly brief. A musical can make room for uncertainty, vanity and unhappiness, but its songs need to change our understanding of those feelings or simply give us musical pleasure. Too often the director stages a number as though the arrival of another capable singer were enough, then sends us back to Guido without much having changed.

There is no shortage of effort here, and the cast deserve credit for making individual passages matter. At 118 minutes, though, Nine asks for more patience than those passages repay. Admirers of Marion Cotillard have a reason to persevere, provided they are willing to wait through a good deal of someone else’s unhappiness. For the songs, we would look elsewhere.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

48
Positive
2
Mixed
5
Negative
5

The consensus leans towards disappointment, with praise clustering around the cast rather than the musical storytelling. Marion Cotillard draws the most consistent approval: several critics find emotional force in her performance even when the surrounding film leaves them cold. Penelope Cruz also earns praise for poignancy, while some reviews acknowledge the cast’s singing and the visual polish. The recurring complaint is that the songs interrupt the drama without supplying memorable tunes or bringing the characters’ feelings into focus.

The spread is wide, however. Variety offers an enthusiastic dissent, finding the musical filmmaking sophisticated and entertaining and Daniel Day-Lewis humorous and engaging. More qualified supporters enjoy individual performances despite the awkward structure. At the other extreme, The Guardian condemns both the acting and the portrayal of women. Comparisons with Fellini’s 8½ generally deepen the reservations, though critics differ over whether the performances compensate for the film’s shortcomings.

Variety
4 December 2009 · Todd McCarthy
85*

McCarthy finds the film sophisticated, sexy, and entertaining, with its musical filmmaking impressing throughout. He especially praises Daniel Day-Lewis’s humorous, engaging performance and the spirited cast.

Read the full review →
Empire
14 May 2008 · Ali Plumb
70*

Plumb finds the film enjoyable overall despite its clunky structure and lack of truly catchy tunes. He particularly praises Marion Cotillard, whose performance and musical numbers steal the show.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No praise or complaint is available to summarize.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
14 December 2009 · Mike Goodridge
64*

The visible page identifies this as a review but does not reveal the critic’s verdict. The paywall also hides what the critic singled out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Time Out
15 December 2009 · ★★★ · Dave Calhoun
60

Calhoun suggests viewers should set aside expectations from Fellini’s 8½ to enjoy the film. He describes it as an angsty romp, while the 3/5 rating signals a measured verdict.

Read the full review →
Total Film
22 December 2009 · ★★★ · Neil Smith
60

Smith finds the film overly stage-bound and its songs mostly forgettable, though the cast can sing and the film has moments of emotion. He praises Marion Cotillard and Penelope Cruz for bringing poignancy to their roles.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Nine worth watching?
Nine is disappointing rather than worth a general recommendation, and we score it 46 out of 100. Marion Cotillard gives its relationship troubles real hurt and anger, but the songs repeatedly interrupt the drama without deepening it. We would reserve it for admirers of her performance rather than anyone looking for a satisfying musical.
How long is Nine, and what is it rated?
Nine runs 1h 58m and is rated PG-13 by the MPA in the US. It is a drama and music film.
Where can I watch Nine in the US?
Nine is streaming on Paramount+, Amazon Prime Video and The Roku Channel in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Nine, and is it suitable for children?
Nine has a US classification cautioning parents that some material may be inappropriate for children under 13. That certificate alone does not establish how violent or frightening it is, so we cannot offer a specific reassurance for sensitive viewers. Its focus on adult relationships and personal unhappiness makes it a more natural choice for older viewers.
How does Nine compare to 8½?
Nine is the weaker choice beside 8½, which we recommend for a more searching and funnier account of creative paralysis and male self-absorption. Nine offers polished musical staging and affecting performances from the women around Guido, but its songs keep breaking the dramatic momentum. We would choose 8½ unless the musical format is the main attraction.
What should I watch after Nine?
After Nine, try 8½ (1963, Fi1m 91): For a more searching account of creative paralysis and male self-absorption. Then All That Jazz (1979, Fi1m 84): Another troubled showman, with musical numbers that make his troubles matter; and The Red Shoes (1948, Fi1m 92): For backstage ambition, difficult relationships and dancing that carries the drama.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2010

Nominated
Best Costume Design
Nominated
Best Production Design
Nominated
Best Supporting Actress

If you liked this, try…

  1. 8½ (1963, Fi1m 91)For a more searching account of creative paralysis and male self-absorption.

  2. All That Jazz (1979, Fi1m 84)Another troubled showman, with musical numbers that make his troubles matter.

  3. The Red Shoes (1948, Fi1m 92)For backstage ambition, difficult relationships and dancing that carries the drama.

  4. The Umbrellas of Cherbourg (1964, Fi1m 88)For songs that sustain a romance rather than repeatedly interrupt it.

  5. Topsy-Turvy (1999, Fi1m 88)For the awkward daily work of making musical entertainment with other people.