A dark cloud hangs over the hills as a thin trail descends beneath it
Film review

Nope

2022 · Directed by Jordan Peele · 2h 10m

In a sentenceThe scariest thing in it is a chimpanzee; the second scariest is a cloud that will not move

Agua Dulce, California, in the scrub hills north of Los Angeles. OJ Haywood (Daniel Kaluuya) and his sister Emerald (Keke Palmer) inherit Haywood’s Hollywood Horses, a ranch that has supplied trained horses to film sets for generations, after their father, Otis Haywood Sr. (Keith David), is killed by a nickel falling from a clear sky. The business is failing, and OJ has been selling horses to the neighbour, Ricky ‘Jupe’ Park (Steven Yeun), a former child star who runs Jupiter’s Claim, a western theme park. Then the power starts cutting out, the horses bolt at night, and one cloud over the gulch stops moving. Emerald wants footage she can sell; OJ wants the horses safe. They buy cameras, and the technician who installs them, Angel Torres (Brandon Perea), refuses to leave.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Jordan Peele’s third film is a flying saucer picture built the way Spielberg built Jaws, and for an hour and a half it is the most frightening thing he has made. The last stretch is a plan and a chase, and it is less frightening than what came before.

Jordan Peele has made a flying saucer film, the kind with a lone ranch, a wide sky and a thing in the clouds, and asked what anyone would do if one turned up. They would reach for a camera. OJ Haywood (Daniel Kaluuya) and his sister Emerald (Keke Palmer) run Haywood’s Hollywood Horses in Agua Dulce, north of Los Angeles, training animals for film sets, and they are losing money. In the opening minutes their father (Keith David) is killed by a nickel that falls out of a clear sky. Soon the horses are bolting, the power is cutting out and one cloud above the gulch has stopped moving. Emerald wants footage she can sell. OJ wants his horses safe.

Hoyte van Hoytema shoots it for the biggest screen there is. The frame is mostly sky, the ranch a strip along the bottom of it, the Haywoods two small figures looking up. The night scenes are lit so the whole valley stays visible, silver and cold, which is what you want when you are trying to spot one dark shape among others. Ruth De Jong builds the Haywood house on a rise with one road in, and next door Jupiter’s Claim, a plywood frontier town with a stage and a wishing well, run by Ricky ‘Jupe’ Park (Steven Yeun), a former child actor who buys OJ’s horses one at a time. Alex Bovaird keeps OJ in one faded orange hoodie for most of the film and puts Jupe in rhinestones, a cowboy hat and a smile that has been photographed too often.

Kaluuya plays OJ almost without speaking. Chin down, eyes up, hands loose, a man who is good with horses and would rather deal only with them. Palmer talks for both of them; her safety speech to a film crew about their horse Lucky is a small comic aria delivered while he stands there in silence, and it tells you everything about the pair. Brandon Perea’s Angel Torres, the shop technician who installs their cameras and then will not leave, is the comic relief and turns out to be more than that. Michael Wincott’s Antlers Holst is a cinematographer who speaks in gravel and shoots on a hand-cranked camera, and every line he has sounds like something Peele saved up for years.

Here is what we felt. A night in the stables, where something walks slowly up the aisle towards OJ, had us watching through our fingers; we will not say what it turns out to be. Then there is the flashback to a sitcom set: a chimpanzee in a party hat, a shoe standing upright on its heel, a boy under a table. Peele keeps the camera low, mostly on the boy, and lets us hear the rest. We were more horrified than we have been in a cinema for years, and he showed us almost none of the violence. It is the one scene where the film’s idea, that staring at a wild thing does not tame it, is on the screen rather than in the dialogue.

The trouble comes late. Once the thing in the sky has been seen properly, the film turns into a heist: a plan, a bicycle, a row of inflatable tube men and a great deal of sky. Nicholas Monsour cuts it cleanly and we always know who is where. Michael Abels’ score swells from nervy strings into a western theme with brass. But the dread has gone, and we noticed. The Gordy story and the saucer story are laid side by side and asked to explain each other, and the film says the connection out loud twice in case we missed it. We had not.

Get Out (2017) had one idea and a locked house. Us (2019) had one idea and doubled it. Nope has three or four and the widest sky Peele has had to work with, and it is the loosest of the three. It is also the one we would most like to see again, on the biggest screen we can find, because at home the sky shrinks and the cloud looks like a cloud. It runs 130 minutes and carries a 15.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

71
Positive
18
Mixed
4
Negative
6

Most critics come away impressed. The word that recurs, in praise and complaint alike, is “ambitious”: this is Jordan Peele attempting a full-scale blockbuster with a critique of spectacle folded inside it. The praise clusters around the look and sound. Hoyte van Hoytema’s wide-format photography of the skies and night-time valleys is singled out repeatedly, as is the sound design that makes empty air feel threatening. Daniel Kaluuya and Keke Palmer are widely admired, with Steven Yeun and Brandon Perea picked out by a few.

The reservations are almost all structural. Even admirers concede that the ideas outrun the storytelling, that the pacing sags and that the final act does not tie the strands together. The spread is wide: full marks from the Evening Standard and Little White Lies, while Polygon calls it Peele’s weakest film. The Guardian and Variety both find it less than the sum of its parts, and the dissenters are not fringe voices.

Evening Standard
11 August 2022 · ★★★★★ · Charlotte O'Sullivan
100

O'Sullivan calls the film an original, brain-engaging event movie that also delivers a rollercoaster ride. She praises the cinematography and its memorable practical effects, as well as Daniel Kaluuya's magnetic performance.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
20 July 2022 · 5/5/5 · Rógan Graham
100

The review praises Nope as a formally accomplished, entertaining film that trusts its audience. It singles out the lead performances and the cinematography and sound for creating tension and striking visuals.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
20 July 2022 · A- · David Ehrlich
90

Ehrlich finds the film a wildly entertaining, inventive blockbuster whose spectacle carries a modern critique of our appetite for real-life terror. He especially praises Hoyte van Hoytema’s 65mm cinematography for giving the set pieces and finale an awe-inspiring scale.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
25 July 2022 · Richard Brody
90*

Brody praises Nope as an ingenious, exhilarating film and a major work about moviemaking and cinematic representation. He singles out Peele’s use of cinema history and the camera’s gaze to explore the exploitation and erasure of Black Americans.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
20 July 2022 · ★★★½/4 · Nick Allen
88

Allen finds the film an ambitious, entertaining spectacle with an unsettling edge. He particularly praises Keke Palmer’s lively performance.

Read the full review →
Vulture
20 July 2022 · Alison Willmore
85*

Willmore finds the film thrilling and incisive, with a compelling critique of celebrity and spectacle. She particularly praises the unsettling use of the wide skies and the frightening flashbacks to Jupe’s sitcom past.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Nope worth watching?
Nope is worth watching for anyone who likes a flying saucer picture built slowly, and we scored it 77. For an hour and a half it is the most frightening thing Jordan Peele has made; the last stretch becomes a plan and a chase, and the dread goes out of it. See it on the biggest screen you can, because at home the sky shrinks and the cloud looks like a cloud.
How long is Nope, and what is it rated?
Nope runs 2h 10m. It is a horror and science fiction film.
Where can I watch Nope in Czechia?
Nope is streaming on HBO Max in Czechia, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from Kč 49.00. It leaves HBO Max on 9 October. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Nope, and is it suitable for children?
Nope carries a 15 in the UK and an R in the US, and it earns them through dread rather than gore. The worst of it is a flashback to a sitcom set with a chimpanzee, where Peele shows almost none of the violence and left us more horrified than we have been in a cinema for years. It is not for children, and the squeamish should know the stables scene is watched through the fingers.
How does Nope compare to Jaws?
Nope is built on the template of Jaws, a lone place, a wide space and one monster kept out of sight, and Peele follows Spielberg's pacing closely. The earlier film is the tighter of the two: its suspense holds to the end, where Nope has three or four ideas and loosens into a heist. Choose Jaws for the cleaner thriller, Nope for the stranger one.
What should I watch after Nope?
After Nope, try Jaws (1975, Fi1m 93): Spielberg’s one-monster film is the template Peele is working from, right down to the pacing. Then Signs (2002, Fi1m 76): A farm, a cornfield and something in the sky; quieter, stranger and just as sincere; and Attack the Block (2011, Fi1m 84): Aliens over a south London estate; the same mix of jokes and terror in ninety minutes.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Jaws (1975, Fi1m 93)Spielberg’s one-monster film is the template Peele is working from, right down to the pacing.

  2. The Host (2006) · not on Fi1m yetBong Joon-ho’s river monster, with a bickering family who turn out to be the point.

  3. Signs (2002, Fi1m 76)A farm, a cornfield and something in the sky; quieter, stranger and just as sincere.

  4. Attack the Block (2011, Fi1m 84)Aliens over a south London estate; the same mix of jokes and terror in ninety minutes.

  5. Close Encounters of the Third Kind (1977, Fi1m 85)Spielberg looks up at the same sky and finds wonder where Peele finds an appetite.