Film review

Raging Bull

1980 · Directed by Martin Scorsese · 2h 09m · 15

In a sentenceThe boxing is the part of Jake LaMotta’s life with rules

DramaHistory

Jake LaMotta (Robert De Niro) is a Bronx middleweight boxer whose aggression does not stop when he leaves the ring. Martin Scorsese’s drama follows his fighting and the personal relationships complicated by his jealousy, with Cathy Moriarty as Vickie LaMotta and Joe Pesci as Joey LaMotta. Jake approaches other people with the same readiness for conflict that he brings to an opponent. Affection is difficult for him to accept without suspicion, particularly where women are concerned. Frank Vincent plays Salvy Batts, and Nicholas Colasanto plays Tommy Como.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Martin Scorsese’s boxing drama is punishing, exact and worth the discomfort, with Robert De Niro making Jake LaMotta frighteningly difficult to dismiss. The repetition outside the ring can weary us, but the violence never becomes an easy pleasure.

Martin Scorsese’s Raging Bull is worth the discomfort it causes. Boxing gives Jake LaMotta somewhere to put his aggression, and the film makes that aggression difficult to mistake for courage. The harder question is why we should spend 129 minutes with a man whose jealousy makes other people’s lives so difficult. Robert De Niro’s performance supplies a persuasive answer, although there are stretches when the repeated hostility tests our patience.

De Niro makes Jake’s limited emotional range frighteningly absorbing. He gives suspicion the concentration another man might devote to listening, so we can sense the effort Jake puts into misunderstanding people. We were horrified by his exchanges with women, where an ordinary remark seems liable to become evidence against the person saying it. The fear beneath the bullying remains visible, but De Niro never makes it an excuse. We can recognise the feeling and still want someone to get away from him.

Cathy Moriarty’s Vickie and Joe Pesci’s Joey give us other people worth watching. Moriarty makes Vickie’s watchfulness interesting in its own right; we want to know what she thinks before Jake decides for her. Pesci brings a quickness to the dialogue that makes a conversation involving Jake feel briefly less dangerous. Both actors can hold our attention while De Niro is there, which matters. They help Mardik Martin and Paul Schrader’s screenplay sustain encounters in which Jake gives other people so little chance to be heard.

Michael Chapman’s black-and-white photography moves between drab everyday surroundings and boxing that feels feverish and unreal. Blood on the ropes makes it difficult to enjoy the choreography simply as a display of skill, however precisely Scorsese organises the fighting. Thelma Schoonmaker’s editing gives the blows a rhythm without making them comfortable to watch; the bouts have shape, and the violence still feels ugly. The images are compelling enough to keep us looking when we would rather stop.

Gene Rudolf’s production design makes Jake’s surroundings feel cramped; there is little relief when we leave the ring. Pietro Mascagni’s music is tender enough to make the brutality harder to bear, and its use avoids the simple instruction to get excited about a fight. There is sadness in the music that Jake has trouble putting into words. It is one reason the film can hold our attention without making him more agreeable.

The film does become repetitive away from the fights. In the writing, jealousy and hostility recur so insistently that some exchanges confirm what we already know rather than show us anything further. The more doubtful reviews have a point about the uneven energy: the boxing can make the surrounding dialogue seem slow. We would shorten a few conversations, though the actors keep enough tension in them for us to stay interested even when Jake’s next suspicion is too easy to anticipate.

An inspirational boxing drama would have little use for this version of Jake. Scorsese is interested in how the qualities that make a fighter formidable become a daily burden for the people around him. That gives the film enough to occupy us beyond its ring sequences, however difficult the company. See it when you can give De Niro your attention, and do not expect to feel refreshed afterwards.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

5 of 6
Positive
4
Mixed
1
Negative
0
Financial Times
13 April 2023 · ★★★★★ · Danny Leigh
100

The review highlights the film’s resistance to personal arcs and redemption in its portrait of elemental brutality. The restored print allows the blood to still drip from the ropes in this savage Bronx middleweight story.

Read the full review →
Empire
20 January 2006 · Ian Nathan
95*

The review declares Raging Bull everything it is cracked up to be, a peerless imprint of what cinema can aspire to in art, truth and exhaustion. It singles out the contrasting docu-drab and dreamily inventive black-and-white cinematography, along with De Niro's performance, for particular praise.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
12 April 2023 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

The critic finds Scorsese’s 1980 biopic a brutally nihilist tale that remains full of despairing beauty and unforgettable performances. The sheer brio and kinetic energy of the nightmarish boxing scenes are singled out as utterly unique.

Read the full review →
Total Film
17 November 2000
90*

The review calls Raging Bull a potent tragedy of a brutal pugilist at war with himself and a truly extraordinary modern classic. It singles out Scorsese's tautly choreographed ring sequences and the performances of De Niro, Pesci and Moriarty.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
10 November 1980 · Ron Pennington
65*

The critic calls it the most unromanticized movie biography ever produced by Hollywood, praising De Niro's brilliant and transformative performance along with the intense, brutal fight sequences. However, the review faults the film for lacking dramatic structure, having a dull improvisational quality outside the fights, and overly stylized techniques that highlight the rest of the film's lack of energy.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
19 December 1980 · Roger Ebert

The critic sees the film as an intense exploration of a man's brute force, anger, grief, and inability to view women beyond a madonna-whore complex, with De Niro and Scorsese fearlessly depicting the protagonist's limited emotional range. He praises the raw portrayal of jealousy, violence, and guilt channeled through boxing and personal relationships.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 1981

Nominated
Best Cinematography
Nominated
Best Director
Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Sound
Nominated
Best Supporting Actor
Nominated
Best Supporting Actress
Won
Best Actor
Won
Best Film Editing

If you liked this, try…

The Set-Up poster

The Set-Up

1949 · A boxer’s working life becomes a tense study of pride and exploitation.

This Sporting Life poster

This Sporting Life

1963 · Another formidable sportsman discovers that force is a poor substitute for tenderness.

A Woman Under the Influence poster

A Woman Under the Influence

1974 · For performances that make domestic arguments almost too uncomfortable to watch.

Tokyo Fist poster

Tokyo Fist

1995 · Boxing, jealousy and bodily punishment, pushed into far more feverish territory.

The Wrestler poster

The Wrestler

2008 · A battered performer tries to manage ordinary life beyond the cheering crowd.