Supergirl poster

Supergirl

2026 · Directed by Craig Gillespie
1h 48mActionAdventureScience Fiction12A
56
Fi1m score
55
Critics · 15
Audience · not yet

Where to watch in the UK

Checked 10 September at 22:28. Prices and availability change; the service’s page is the last word.

Synopsis

Kara (Milly Alcock) is Superman’s cousin, drinks more than someone with her powers should, and is nursing a hangover when a girl called Ruthye (Eve Ridley) finds her. Ruthye wants a man named Krem (Matthias Schoenaerts) dead, and she has her reasons. Krem has also taken a dog that Kara wants back, so the two of them set off after him across a run of grubby moons and bars, crossing paths with the bounty hunter Lobo (Jason Momoa). Flashbacks return to Kara’s parents, Zor-El (David Krumholtz) and Alura In-Ze (Emily Beecham), and the world she lost. David Corenswet’s Superman appears. Craig Gillespie directs from a script by Ana Nogueira; it runs 108 minutes and carries a 12A.

Fi1m review

In a sentenceA hungover god crosses the galaxy for a dog, and the film is mostly the hangover

Milly Alcock is a sour, tired, believable Supergirl and the film around her cannot keep up. A simple revenge plot, a child, a dog and three editors, and the fights are still too dark to follow.

Craig Gillespie’s Supergirl keeps its plot small, and it is right to. Kara (Milly Alcock) is woken from a hangover by a girl called Ruthye (Eve Ridley) who wants a man named Krem (Matthias Schoenaerts) dead, and Krem happens to have a dog Kara wants back, so off they go. That is the whole of it. Ana Nogueira’s script has a good shape, a revenge story with a child in it, and then fills the shape with people saying the obvious thing in the flattest available way. The film is likeable in outline and dull in detail, and the detail is where we spent 108 minutes.

Alcock is the reason to see it, and most critics have said so, which for once is fair. She plays Kara as someone who has lost a world and dealt with it by getting drunk in other people’s bars, and she never asks to be liked. The slouch, the flat stare, the way she takes a punch as an inconvenience: it is a proper physical performance. When the film gives her a quiet scene with Ridley, who is watchful and does not play cute, the two of them are worth the ticket. It does not give them enough of those scenes.

The flashbacks are the other thing that works. David Krumholtz and Emily Beecham play Kara’s parents, Zor-El and Alura In-Ze, in a handful of scenes on a world that is ending, and they got at us more than we expected. Krumholtz plays a father who knows what is coming and cannot say it, and the second of these scenes left us with a lump in the throat we had not budgeted for. Then the film cut back to a fight in the dark, and the feeling had nowhere to go.

About the dark. Rob Hardy shoots the bars and back streets in browns and greys with faces half in shadow, and the idea is plain enough: a Supergirl film that looks like the morning after. The trouble is that the action happens in the same light and is cut by three editors, James Gunn, Fred Raskin and Tatiana S. Riegel, into pieces so short we often could not say who had hit whom or from which side. Neil Lamont’s sets, rust and scaffold and bad lighting, are more interesting when the camera holds still than the film ever lets them be in motion. Claudia Sarne’s score does more to hold the chases together than the cutting does.

Schoenaerts plays Krem as a tired man rather than a monster, which is a sensible choice the script never rewards; he is given nothing to want beyond staying ahead of us. Jason Momoa’s Lobo arrives, shouts, and leaves, and the film seemed as unsure as we were what he was for. Anna B. Sheppard and Michael Mooney dress Kara down, in worn layers rather than a shining suit, and it suits Alcock better than anything in the dialogue does. David Corenswet’s Superman appears and is polite.

Gillespie made I, Tonya (2017) and Cruella (2021), two films that let awkward, angry women be funny about their own damage. Kara should have been his. But the wit is missing here; the tagline promises “Whatever” and the film keeps stopping to explain that it means it. Against the run of these films it is neither the worst nor a reason to stop making them. It does not waste our time so much as under-use it.

Go for Alcock, if you go. Sit near the front, because the fights are dark enough that the back row will see a brown rectangle with noises coming out of it. And if you find yourself, around the hour mark, wanting the film to stop and let its two women talk, you have found the better film the script kept walking past.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

55
Positive
4
Mixed
7
Negative
4

Most critics agree on one thing: Milly Alcock. The reviews return again and again to her hard-partying, fed-up Kara, and several say she is the only reason to see the film. Agreement stops there. The spread is wide, from warm to hostile, with the largest group in the middle. The reservations cluster around the script and the direction: dialogue described as flat, a plot too small for its cosmic setting, action sequences that are hard to follow, and a general sense that the film plays it safe where Superman took risks. Sight and Sound finds it faithful to the comic but colourless; Variety goes further and calls the writing terrible and the punk pose desperate. The warmest notices come from IndieWire, which likes its grimy, small-scale independence from the franchise, and Collider, which thinks fans get a definitive Supergirl. Most others land somewhere between likeable and underwhelming.

IndieWire
24 June 2026 · B+ · Kate Erbland
83

Milly Alcock delights as a sardonic Supergirl who forges her own path in a grimy, small-scale adventure that avoids Superman's tone. The film is praised for its character focus and independence from franchise expectations.

Read the full review →
Empire
24 June 2026 · Leila Latif
65*

The film is a lively but not entirely convincing space opera that plays it safe, offering only diet-James Gunn instead of bolder swings. Milly Alcock's hungover, hard-partying Supergirl is delightful and the origin flashbacks are heartbreaking, but the thin plot and lack of scene-stealing supporting cast leave it blandly safe overall.

Read the full review →
Time Out
24 June 2026 · ★★★ · Olly Richards
60

The review calls the film safe, fun and easy to watch with a trim running time but ultimately undistinguished. It singles out the simple dog-saving mission and Alcock's authentic fed-up presence for praise.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
24 June 2026
50*

The review describes a likeable but underwhelming sci-fi adventure that only sporadically shows its protagonist at her best. Milly Alcock is praised for having the chops and gravity for the role.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
24 June 2026 · ★★ · Jeremy Aspinall
40

The critic deems it an underpowered and underwhelming superhero flick. Alcock's grunge aesthetic and attitude are highlighted as rising above the weak script and direction.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
24 June 2026 · ★★
40

The moody heroine and flat dialogue make the film a chore, wasting Milly Alcock's talents despite some dynamic action sequences and amusing supporting turns.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

If you liked this, try…

True Grit poster

True Grit

2010 · A girl hires a drunk to hunt a killer; the story this one is borrowing.

Lady Snowblood poster

Lady Snowblood

1973 · Revenge across a whole country, shot in colours this film could not find in the dark.

I, Tonya poster

I, Tonya

2017 · Gillespie letting an angry woman be funny about it, which he forgot to do here.

Logan poster

Logan

2017 · A tired hero, a fierce child and a road; the same shape, done properly.

Guardians of the Galaxy poster

Guardians of the Galaxy

2014 · The Gunn template for grubby space and bad company, with the jokes still attached.