Frank Hamer (Kevin Costner) and two lawmen look down at a body in the road
Film review

The Highwaymen

2019 · Directed by John Lee Hancock · 2h 13m

In a sentenceKevin Costner and Woody Harrelson make good travelling companions, provided nobody needs to get anywhere

Retired Texas Rangers Frank Hamer (Kevin Costner) and Manny Gault (Woody Harrelson) take to the road in pursuit of Bonnie and Clyde. The outlaws have attracted a following, and the two men must track a pair whose exploits already command public attention. Around them are Ma Ferguson (Kathy Bates), Lee Simmons (John Carroll Lynch) and Deputy Ted Hinton (Thomas Mann). Hamer and Gault bring their experience to the chase, along with different temperaments and a tendency to argue in the car. The pursuit follows the men doing the tracking, keeping the celebrated outlaws at a distance.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Kevin Costner and Woody Harrelson make good company, but John Lee Hancock’s manhunt rarely gathers urgency. Handsome period craft cannot disguise the repetition or the film’s excessive faith in its lawmen.

The Highwaymen wants to return the Bonnie and Clyde story to the men sent after them, and John Lee Hancock gives those men plenty of time to explain themselves. Too much time, as it turns out. This is a fitfully engaging crime drama whose two leading performances are better than its account of law and order. Its patience is welcome at first, especially when Kevin Costner and Woody Harrelson are simply sitting together, but the pursuit rarely develops much pressure.

Kevin Costner plays Frank Hamer with a stubbornness that makes charm seem beside the point. He is convincing as a man who expects his experience to settle an argument. Woody Harrelson gives Manny Gault more warmth and uncertainty, allowing some doubt into the partnership. We laughed at their irritable exchanges in the car, because both actors make the bickering sound like a habit neither man intends to break. Their shared history feels credible without needing constant explanation.

John Fusco’s screenplay is less persuasive when it asks the pair to speak for the film. The weightier speeches explain their attitudes without making those attitudes much more complicated. There is room for unease about the methods of these lawmen, but too often their weariness seems to be offered as sufficient proof that they deserve our trust. The conversations become repetitive because the screenplay keeps returning to a respect for authority it has done too little to test.

John Schwartzman’s cinematography gives the journey broad, golden landscapes, allowing our attention to wander beyond the conversations. Michael Corenblith’s production design makes the period settings look lived in, and there is pleasure in having time to look around them. Neither contribution is helped by how long we are asked to look. After a while, the warmth of the images contributes to a settled, comfortable mood when the pursuit needs something less reassuring.

Robert Frazen’s editing gives the actors room, which is useful when a pause contains irritation or doubt. It becomes a problem when another exchange leaves us much where the previous one did. At 133 minutes, the film allows repetition to pass for thoroughness, while Thomas Newman’s music reinforces the solemn mood without supplying the urgency missing from the scenes. The slow pace is a choice, but it needs to reveal more about these men to justify quite this much time in their company.

A police procedural need not hurry, and there is no reason to object to a film that questions the glamour attached to its criminals. The difficulty here is that Bonnie and Clyde’s public appeal is treated largely as something to disapprove of. Understanding that appeal would make the task of opposing them more interesting. John Lee Hancock spends so much effort correcting their image that his lawmen are allowed comparatively little scrutiny, beyond the doubts Woody Harrelson brings to the partnership.

Admirers of either lead will find stretches worth their time, particularly when the film lets the partnership be funny. We cannot recommend the full journey on that basis: the jokes and the performances have to compensate for too much waiting. For a tense manhunt, we would look elsewhere.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

53
Positive
4
Mixed
10
Negative
8

The consensus on The Highwaymen is mixed, with praise concentrated on Kevin Costner and Woody Harrelson rather than the pursuit around them. Across favourable and unfavourable reviews, their weary rapport, irritable exchanges and contrasting performances give the film much of its appeal. Some critics also admire the expansive landscapes and period detail, though the leads are the more consistent source of enthusiasm.

The main divide concerns whether this lawmen-centred retelling offers a useful correction to the romanticising of Bonnie and Clyde or merely replaces it with another selective account. The Los Angeles Times welcomes a sober, effective counterpoint; The Guardian regards it as an unconvincing defence of police brutality and reactionary masculinity. Between those poles, reservations cluster around sluggish pacing, familiar procedure and underdeveloped moral questions. The spread is wide, but complaints about a lack of urgency recur even among critics who enjoy the central partnership.

Los Angeles Times
14 March 2019 · Michael Ordoña
85*

Ordoña finds the film a sober, effective counterpoint to the romanticized Bonnie and Clyde story. He especially praises Kevin Costner’s grounded performance and the actors’ ability to convey the lawmen’s shared history without clichés.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Andrew Collins
80

Collins gives the film four stars, presenting it as a retelling of the Bonnie and Clyde story from the lawmen’s perspective. The supplied excerpt singles out the focus on the two retired Texas Rangers.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
11 March 2019 · B- · Eric Kohn
70

Kohn finds the film a sturdy, well-acted but overly familiar procedural that falls short of making its case against the classic Bonnie and Clyde story. He praises the chemistry between Costner and Harrelson and the cinematography’s expansive golden landscapes.

Read the full review →
Variety
10 March 2019 · festival review · Joe Leydon
70*

Leydon finds the film workmanlike but engaging, chiefly as a showcase for its well-matched leads. He praises Costner and Harrelson’s chemistry and world-weary performances, while noting that few scenes are conventionally exciting.

Read the full review →
Empire
26 March 2019 · Ian Freer
65*

Freer finds the film enjoyable but leisurely, with too little excitement or urgency. He singles out the chemistry between Kevin Costner and Woody Harrelson as its chief strength.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page is blocked by a browser check, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No praise or complaint from the review is available in the provided text.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Highwaymen worth watching?
The Highwaymen offers good company in Kevin Costner and Woody Harrelson, but we score it 55 out of 100 and cannot recommend it as a tense manhunt. Admirers of either actor may enjoy the irritable car conversations and convincing partnership; the repetitive speeches and leisurely 133-minute running time make the full journey harder to justify.
How long is The Highwaymen, and what is it rated?
The Highwaymen runs 2h 13m. It is a crime and drama film.
Where can I watch The Highwaymen in Hungary?
The Highwaymen is streaming on Netflix in Hungary. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is The Highwaymen, and is it suitable for children?
The Highwaymen has a US R certificate, so we would not recommend it for children; no UK certificate is supplied. That rating indicates adult material, but we cannot give a specific account of violence or frightening scenes here: our review describes a solemn, slow-moving pursuit rather than detailing its potentially upsetting content.
How does The Highwaymen compare to Memories of Murder?
The Highwaymen is the weaker choice beside Memories of Murder, which we recommend for a patient police investigation that asks sharper questions about its investigators. Costner and Harrelson provide companionable humour, but their film gives its lawmen too much credit; Bong Joon Ho’s procedural is funnier and more unsettling, though its long middle stretch also drags.
What should I watch after The Highwaymen?
After The Highwaymen, try Memories of Murder (2003, Fi1m 91): A patient police investigation with sharper doubts about the men conducting it. Then The Straight Story (1999, Fi1m 88): For the roads, the ageing traveller and the patience, without the manhunt; and Hell or High Water (2016, Fi1m 84): Pursuing lawmen and sympathetic outlaws share a landscape that explains their choices.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Friends of Eddie Coyle (1973) · not on Fi1m yetAnother weary crime story, with more danger in its unhurried conversations.

  2. Memories of Murder (2003, Fi1m 91)A patient police investigation with sharper doubts about the men conducting it.

  3. The Straight Story (1999, Fi1m 88)For the roads, the ageing traveller and the patience, without the manhunt.

  4. Hell or High Water (2016, Fi1m 84)Pursuing lawmen and sympathetic outlaws share a landscape that explains their choices.

  5. Le Cercle Rouge (1970) · not on Fi1m yetAn unhurried crime film whose silences keep tightening the pressure.

The Highwaymen (2019) review: Fine leads but a sluggish manhunt (Hungary) | Fi1m