Calamity Jane (Jane Russell) faces Peter Potter (Bob Hope) in a Western outfit and fringed jacket
Film review

The Paleface

1948 · Directed by Norman Z. McLeod · 1h 31m

In a sentenceBob Hope does the talking; Jane Russell makes us grateful for the gaps

‘Painless’ Peter Potter (Bob Hope) and Calamity Jane (Jane Russell) are the central pair in this western comedy. Potter supplies wisecracks and slapstick, while Jane brings a drier manner to their exchanges. Terris (Robert Armstrong), Pepper (Iris Adrian) and Toby Preston (Bobby Watson) are also part of the story. Verbal sparring and physical comedy share space with the song ‘Buttons and Bows’. The comedy centres on the contrast between Potter’s lively delivery and Jane’s deadpan humour, putting their different temperaments together within a western setting.

Fi1m review

Bob Hope’s wisecracks and Jane Russell’s drollness make The Paleface pleasant company. The comedy grows repetitive, but the pairing and ‘Buttons and Bows’ offer enough to reward an appetite for western slapstick.

The Paleface is an amiable western comedy with an effective pairing and a limited stock of comic moves. We recommend it chiefly to those who enjoy Bob Hope’s wisecracks, with a reservation about how often they become the entire attraction. Norman Z. McLeod gets useful contrast from Hope and Jane Russell, whose droll delivery gives the chatter some resistance. Their exchanges are enough to sustain most of its 91 minutes.

As ‘Painless’ Peter Potter, Bob Hope combines verbal comedy with slapstick, giving us two ways to enjoy the same performer. We laughed at the switches between the wisecracks and the physical foolishness. Hope is good company when both sides of the performance are working, although his constant readiness with another joke can grow tiresome. A little less insistence would make some of the comedy more inviting.

Jane Russell’s Calamity Jane provides welcome relief from that insistence. Her drollness gives the comedy a different speed, and she can hold attention without adopting Hope’s manner. We enjoyed her restraint more than some of his busier efforts; she gives a joke time to register without seeming anxious about the result. The pairing works because she has a comic presence of her own, rather than merely providing someone for him to address.

Frank Tashlin and Edmund Hartmann’s screenplay makes good use of that difference, but the comedy could use more variety. Wisecracks and slapstick are a sturdy combination, and neither requires a complicated story to earn a laugh. Yet the film returns to familiar pleasures often enough that their effectiveness begins to diminish. McLeod keeps the performers prominent, which is sensible, but does too little to make the weaker jokes worth our attention.

Ray Rennahan’s cinematography and Ellsworth Hoagland’s editing serve the performances without becoming competing attractions. That is a useful quality in a comedy whose pleasures depend so heavily on delivery and response. Neither contribution gives us as much to enjoy independently of the leads, however, and the surroundings make less impression than the people. For a western comedy, it is unusually dependent on our appetite for its particular comedians.

Victor Young’s music contributes to the easy-going feel, and ‘Buttons and Bows’ provides a welcome break from the spoken jokes. The song gives the film another way to hold attention without demanding an immediate laugh. There is charm here that some of the more determined attempts to amuse could use. A comedy benefits from occasionally allowing everyone, including its audience, to relax.

The western spoof offers plenty of scope for puncturing heroic behaviour, but McLeod places his trust chiefly in the performers. That approach works well enough for a light evening, even if the film has little to offer anyone resistant to Hope’s patter. Russell supplies a good reason to stay when the chatter begins to pall. Try it for her if Hope usually wears you down, but do not expect her to silence him.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

68
Positive
2
Mixed
2
Negative
0
Variety
31 December 1947 · Variety Staff
80*

The review finds the western comedy amusing and well served by its script. It praises Jane Russell as an able sparring partner for Bob Hope and singles out the song “Buttons and Bows.”

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
70*

The available description is positive about Bob Hope’s performance. It singles out his portrayal of Painless Potter as perhaps his finest role.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
16 December 1948
64*

The URL identifies this as a New York Times screen review of The Paleface. The page was inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict and specific praise or complaints cannot be determined.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Tom Vallance
60

Vallance calls the film very entertaining and one of Bob Hope’s most popular films. He praises Hope’s lively blend of wisecracks and slapstick, alongside Jane Russell’s droll comedy.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Paleface worth watching?
The Paleface is worth watching chiefly for fans of Bob Hope’s wisecracks and western slapstick; we give it 68 out of 100. Jane Russell’s dry delivery and ‘Buttons and Bows’ provide welcome changes of pace, but the jokes grow repetitive, and we find the pairing more rewarding than the comedy around it.
How long is The Paleface, and what is it rated?
The Paleface runs 1h 31m. It is a comedy and western film.
Where can I watch The Paleface in the UAE?
The Paleface is not on any streaming or rental service in the UAE at the moment. It is available in 3 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How does The Paleface compare to Destry Rides Again?
The Paleface offers lighter, more repetitive western slapstick than Destry Rides Again, which we recommend more readily for its gentler hero and greater weight behind the jokes. Hope’s patter and Russell’s restraint are the main reasons to choose The Paleface; James Stewart and Marlene Dietrich’s chemistry makes Destry Rides Again the stronger choice for more than a string of laughs.
What should I watch after The Paleface?
After The Paleface, try Destry Rides Again (1939, Fi1m 84): For western comedy with a gentler hero and more weight behind the jokes. Then The General (1926, Fi1m 91): For physical comedy that makes every practical problem harder than the last.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Destry Rides Again (1939, Fi1m 84)For western comedy with a gentler hero and more weight behind the jokes.

  2. The General (1926, Fi1m 91)For physical comedy that makes every practical problem harder than the last.

  3. The Court Jester (1955) · not on Fi1m yetAnother unlikely hero, with verbal muddles and physical comedy given more room.

  4. The Tall Blond Man with One Black Shoe (1972) · not on Fi1m yetA blundering innocent makes dangerous company in this dry French spy comedy.

  5. The Good, the Bad, the Weird (2008) · not on Fi1m yetFor a louder western diversion, with comic energy and much bigger chases.