Film review

The Rock

1996 · Directed by Michael Bay · 2h 17m · MPA R

In a sentenceNicolas Cage worries enough for two men, leaving Sean Connery free to be difficult

ActionAdventureThriller

Five million lives depend on two men getting into Alcatraz, a prison that only one man has ever escaped. Sean Connery plays John Patrick Mason and Nicolas Cage plays Dr Stanley Goodspeed, the pair at the centre of the mission. Ed Harris plays their opponent, Brigadier General Francis X. Hummel. Michael Bay directs an action thriller that takes in a San Francisco car chase and a military confrontation at Alcatraz. The cast also includes John Spencer as FBI Director James Womack, David Morse as Major Tom Baxter and Michael Biehn as Commander Charles Anderson.

Fi1m review

Michael Bay’s The Rock is loud, implausible and good company, largely because Sean Connery, Nicolas Cage and Ed Harris make the nonsense worth following. The editing occasionally makes following it harder than necessary.

Michael Bay’s The Rock is good, noisy action entertainment, kept lively by three actors who give us reasons to care about an implausible story. Two men must get into Alcatraz because five million lives depend on it. Bay treats this as permission to make a considerable mess, and his enthusiasm for the destruction is often infectious. The trouble comes when he presses just as hard on material that would benefit from being left alone.

Sean Connery’s John Patrick Mason and Nicolas Cage’s Dr Stanley Goodspeed are an enjoyable pairing because they seem so ill-suited to working together. Cage’s anxious energy gives the action a welcome uncertainty; we do not get the usual reassurance of a hero entirely at ease with danger. Connery’s confidence is funny without much apparent effort. Their exchanges make the pauses between set pieces worth waiting for, even when the dialogue gives them little help.

Ed Harris gives Brigadier General Francis X. Hummel enough troubled conviction to make the opposition interesting. The character’s conflict comes across in the performance without Harris having to beg for our sympathy, and it gives the confrontations a weight that the plotting cannot supply on its own. Harris commands attention without competing with the noise around him. This kind of action thriller needs someone who can make its threat worth taking seriously, particularly when the other leads are such entertaining company.

We were properly excited by the San Francisco car chase, where Bay’s appetite for destruction has a clear purpose and the stunt work supplies its own pleasure. John Schwartzman’s photography gives the action an emphatic scale, although that insistence can become tiring elsewhere. Michael White’s production design makes Alcatraz feel difficult to move through, a useful obstacle for a film so keen on speed. There is enough here to look at without Bay continually hurrying us towards the next thing.

Richard Francis-Bruce’s editing is less dependable, sacrificing clarity too often in the effort to sustain momentum. Fast cutting is useful when it sharpens the danger, but here it sometimes makes the action harder to follow. The score by Nick Glennie-Smith and Hans Zimmer contributes plenty of drive and too little relief, pressing for excitement when the scene has already earned it. We would have welcomed more restraint in passages where the actors or the stunts were doing quite enough.

The screenplay, credited to Douglas S. Cook, Jonathan Hensleigh, Mark Rosner and David Weisberg, gives these actors some stubbornly second-hand dialogue. It also demands a tolerance for implausibility that the speed can disguise only for so long. Yet the central pairing survives the weak lines, and Hummel’s conflicted position gives Harris something substantial to play. At 137 minutes, the film has time to wear out some of its welcome, particularly when another burst of urgency feels much like the last.

By the standards of the action thriller, the casting makes an important difference: these are people we enjoy watching deal with a problem. Bay’s staging gives them enough forceful spectacle to justify the scale of the threat, even if his impatience occasionally spoils the view. There is little here for anyone who needs a plot to survive close inspection. Choose it for an evening of action, and keep control of the volume.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

4 of 6
Positive
3
Mixed
0
Negative
1
Radio Times
★★★★ · John Ferguson
80

The critic calls it the most satisfying of Michael Bay's blockbusters and praises its role in establishing Nicolas Cage as an unlikely action hero. Bay's enthusiasm for stunts and destruction proves highly contagious.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Chris Hewitt
75*

The critic finds The Rock breathlessly exciting despite its loud, bombastic style and editing flaws. Standout elements include Bay's action choreography and Ed Harris' conflicted villain, along with the strong buddy chemistry between Cage and Connery.

Read the full review →
Time Out
26 September 2014 · WH
70*

The review praises Bay for propelling a mix of combat war movie, Die Hard-style actioner and adventure on high octane despite clichéd dialogue and implausible plot. It singles out the best San Francisco car chase to date.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
10 June 1996 · Terrence Rafferty
40*

The film pounds the captive viewer into submission with nonstop action in a manic style. Connery is up against something bigger and scarier than Alcatraz in this huge-scale action movie.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
7 June 1996 · Kenneth Turan

The film is a nonstop aural bombardment that beats viewers into submission, slick and forceful but largely unconcerned with character. It epitomizes trends in Hollywood filmmaking that have made many people very rich while impoverishing audiences.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
3 June 1996 · David Hunter

The critic calls it an above-average big-budget action film with enough macho behavior and explosive thrills to please genre fans, despite credibility problems. The fast, ferocious direction and solid performances from the lead trio make the slick, silly ride entertaining.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 1997

Nominated
Best Sound

If you liked this, try…

Speed poster86

Speed

1994 · Another unlikely partnership makes an outrageous threat feel worth taking seriously.

Crimson Tide poster

Crimson Tide

1995 · Military authority gets a sterner examination, with two actors worth listening to.

Police Story poster

Police Story

1985 · For physical action staged clearly enough to appreciate the risk and the joke.

The Train poster

The Train

1964 · A military thriller whose practical action makes every obstruction matter.

Ronin poster78

Ronin

1998 · Tense teamwork and car chases for those who prefer less reassurance.