Alfonse Van Worden (Zbigniew Cybulski) shouts from a carriage surrounded by masked figures
Film review

The Saragossa Manuscript

1966 · Directed by Wojciech Has · 3h 03m

In a sentenceEvery time he wakes up under the gallows we laughed harder, and by the third we were less sure it was funny

Saragossa, during the Napoleonic siege. Two officers from opposing armies take shelter in the same abandoned house, find a thick illustrated book, and stop fighting to read it. The book concerns one man’s grandfather: Alfonse Van Worden (Zbigniew Cybulski), a captain of the Walloon Guard, who insists on reaching Madrid by the shortest road, through the mountains, though everyone he meets tells him they are cursed. His servants desert him. At the inn of Venta Quemada he is served supper by two Moorish princesses, Emina (Iga Cembrzyńska) and Zibelda (Joanna Jędryka), who claim to be his cousins and offer him a drink from a skull. He wakes beneath a gallows, beside two hanged men. He rides on, meets a hermit, and the road begins to repeat itself.

Fi1m review

Wojciech Has’s three-hour film is a set of stories folded inside other stories, played straight and shot beautifully. It is funny, strange and long, and it loses us for a stretch in the middle, but it is a film we would send people to.

Wojciech Has opens with the siege of Saragossa. Two officers on opposite sides take cover in the same empty house, find a large illustrated book, and sit down together to read it while the guns go on outside. The book tells of Alfonse Van Worden, a captain of the Walloon Guard who wants to reach Madrid by the shortest road, through the mountains, and will not hear that they are haunted. From there the film runs 183 minutes, in black and white, and by our count is at one point six stories deep. It is built almost entirely out of people sitting down to tell each other things, and it is the most enjoyable film of that kind we know.

Zbigniew Cybulski plays Van Worden with a stiff, slightly baffled dignity. His father (Sławomir Lindner) has drilled him in honour and duels, and he spends the film trying to behave like a brave man while the world declines to behave like a world. At the inn of Venta Quemada two princesses, Emina (Iga Cembrzyńska) and Zibelda (Joanna Jędryka), feed him, call him cousin and hand him a skull to drink from. He wakes under a gallows next to two hanged men. He rides on, meets a hermit, and it happens again. Cybulski is funniest when he is most composed, straightening his coat while a corpse slumps against him.

The second half moves to a castle where the guests tell stories over dinner, and each story contains a story. Don Pedro Velasquez (Gustaw Holoubek), a mathematician, tries to draw the whole thing as a diagram and gives up. Camilla de Tormez (Barbara Krafftówna), Donna Frasquetta Salero (Elżbieta Czyżewska), Senor Toledo (Bogumił Kobiela) and Don Lopez Soarez (Krzysztof Litwin) appear in tales that belong to other people and then walk into the tale we thought we were in. Tadeusz Kwiatkowski’s screenplay, from Jan Potocki’s novel, does not tidy any of this. It keeps the nesting, and trusts us to remember whose voice we are hearing.

Mieczysław Jahoda shoots the mountains as white rock under a hard sun, with figures small against it, and the interiors in deep focus, so that a table of food, a skull and a man standing by the far wall are all sharp at once. The gallows is filmed from the same low angle each time it returns, which is why the joke keeps working. Tadeusz Myszorek and Jerzy Skarżyński fill the inn and the castle with objects that look owned rather than dressed: chess pieces, bottles, a bed with far too many hangings. Jerzy and Lidia Skarżyńska put Van Worden in a uniform that gets no dirtier however many times he wakes on the ground, which is its own small joke. Krzysztof Penderecki’s music is used sparingly, harpsichord fragments and low electronic hums, and it is at its best when it simply stops. Krystyna Komosińska cuts between levels of the story without a dissolve or a caption, and the film would be far less alive if she had softened it.

Here is what we felt. We laughed at the gallows the second time. The third time the laugh caught in our throat and turned into something nearer vertigo, because the film was plainly not going to explain the repetition, and we realised we no longer wanted it to. Later, deep in the second half, we were lost and tired, and we say so.

The tiredness has a location. The stretch of farce around Toledo, Soarez and the Salero household runs perhaps forty minutes, and for much of it we could not have said whose story we were inside, and did not much care. It is the one section where the nesting feels like a habit rather than a design. Then Has cuts back to Van Worden, still on his road, and the film snaps to attention again.

Cybulski had been the restless young man of Ashes and Diamonds (1958); here he is the still point that a whole mad structure turns around, and he is good enough that we never lost hold of him even when we had lost everything else. See it in one sitting, with an interval, and do not try to keep a map. It is not a film that rewards note-taking. It rewards giving in.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

3 of 6
Positive
1
Mixed
2
Negative
0
The Guardian
19 November 2025 · Peter Bradshaw
80*

Bradshaw finds the film an outrageous, head-spinning delight, praising its inventive narrative chaos. He singles out its innocent, refined tone despite its wild departures from conventional storytelling.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
21 May 1999
64*

The page is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be established. No specific praise or complaint can be verified from the available text.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 December 2007 · David Jenkins
64*

The standfirst frames the viewing experience as an open question rather than giving a clear verdict. It singles out the film’s literary scale and full three-hour runtime.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Saragossa Manuscript worth watching?
The Saragossa Manuscript is worth watching for anyone who can give three hours to a black-and-white film built out of people telling each other stories, and we scored it 84. It is funny, strange and shot beautifully, though a stretch of farce in the second half loses its grip for perhaps forty minutes. See it in one sitting, with an interval, and do not try to keep a map.
How long is The Saragossa Manuscript, and what is it rated?
The Saragossa Manuscript runs 3h 03m. It is a fantasy and mystery film.
Where can I watch The Saragossa Manuscript in the UAE?
The Saragossa Manuscript is not on any streaming or rental service in the UAE at the moment. Availability is checked daily.
Is The Saragossa Manuscript based on a true story or a book?
The Saragossa Manuscript is based on a book, Jan Potocki's novel, and not on a true story. Tadeusz Kwiatkowski's screenplay keeps the novel's stories nested inside other stories rather than tidying them, so the film is at one point six tales deep. You do not need to know the book to follow it; the film asks you to remember whose voice you are hearing, and rewards giving in rather than keeping notes.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Hourglass Sanatorium (1973) · not on Fi1m yetHas again, dreamier and sadder, wandering a hospital where time has stopped.

  2. Arabian Nights (1974) · not on Fi1m yetPasolini’s tales within tales, earthy where Has is arch, and just as unhurried.

  3. Valerie and Her Week of Wonders (1970) · not on Fi1m yetCzech fever dream of vampires and grandmothers; the logic is a teenager’s, on purpose.

  4. Kwaidan (1964) · not on Fi1m yetFour Japanese ghost stories told slowly, on sets painted like the inside of a dream.

  5. The Phantom of Liberty (1974) · not on Fi1m yetBuñuel hands the story from stranger to stranger and never once looks back.