Queen Victoria (Emily Blunt) stands beside Prince Albert (Rupert Friend) in a candlelit church
Film review

The Young Victoria

2009 · Directed by Jean-Marc Vallée · 1h 45m · MPA PG

In a sentenceEmily Blunt makes royal independence look like a reasonable request for everyone to stop helping

At court, the future Queen Victoria (Emily Blunt) wants a say in how she lives and whom she trusts. Her mother, the Duchess of Kent (Miranda Richardson), and Sir John Conroy (Mark Strong) stand in the way of that independence as she approaches the throne. Prince Albert (Rupert Friend) brings the prospect of a relationship she might choose for herself. Family disputes and royal obligations surround the courtship, leaving Victoria to distinguish the people who care for her from those who want to direct her.

Fi1m review

Emily Blunt and Rupert Friend make this royal courtship worth an evening. The family quarrels have some bite, but the politics and supporting characters are too neatly managed to trouble an otherwise pleasing romance.

Jean-Marc Vallée’s The Young Victoria is an agreeable royal romance, carried by Emily Blunt and Rupert Friend, and rather less persuasive when it asks us to worry about power. Julian Fellowes gives Victoria plenty of people to resist, but the film is reluctant to let that resistance become seriously uncomfortable. There is pleasure in watching a young woman insist on her own wishes. The romance deserves the attention it gets; some of the other characters could have used a little more.

Emily Blunt supplies the necessary stubbornness without making Queen Victoria seem ready-made for the throne. Her restraint works because it suggests effort: this is a young woman trying to keep her impatience presentable. We felt angry on her behalf during the conflicts with her mother and Sir John Conroy, whose pressure leaves so little room for her own wishes. Miranda Richardson and Mark Strong give her something definite to resist, and these family quarrels are among Julian Fellowes’s most effective material.

With Prince Albert, the film becomes easier company. Rupert Friend makes the attraction to Emily Blunt believable without straining for a grand passion that would leave everyone else looking underemployed. Their mutual interest feels persuasive, and the formality does not prevent warmth from coming through. Julian Fellowes gives Albert less room to develop than Victoria, however, and a change in his manner feels imposed by the script rather than earned by what we have seen. That unevenness matters because the romance asks us to take both people seriously.

Paul Bettany gives Lord Melbourne a welcome suggestion of calculation, making his intelligence attractive and faintly suspect. He makes us curious about what Melbourne wants, which is more than some of the supporting characters manage. Elsewhere, Julian Fellowes is too willing to let a person be understood at a glance. There are competing wishes here, but the writing seldom allows them to become as interesting as Victoria’s courtship.

Hagen Bogdanski’s framing helps keep Emily Blunt visible as a person rather than a royal portrait. The images have the requisite formality, but the faces remain worth watching amid the finery. Patrice Vermette’s production design makes privilege look comfortable, perhaps more comfortable than this story needs. Sandy Powell’s costumes contribute to the sense of propriety the actors must work through, although Jean-Marc Vallée sometimes seems too content to let the clothes and surroundings hold our attention when the drama slackens.

Editors Matt Garner and Jill Bilcock keep the story manageable within 105 minutes, though the supporting characters suffer from how quickly their business is settled. A little more time with them might have made the court feel less conveniently arranged around its heroine. Ilan Eshkeri’s music gives the romance welcome warmth, but occasionally makes the intended response too obvious. The attraction between Emily Blunt and Rupert Friend is strong enough to need less encouragement.

A costume romance does not have to embarrass its characters to make their feelings believable. Emily Blunt and Rupert Friend are persuasive within the film’s reserve, and we would gladly have spent longer with them. Choose it for the couple, and do not expect the politics to keep pace.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

61
Positive
5
Mixed
5
Negative
2

The reviews lean towards qualified approval, with praise clustering around Emily Blunt’s performance and her chemistry with Rupert Friend. Most critics find her Victoria lively, nuanced or determined, giving the romance enough feeling to sustain an otherwise restrained costume drama. The handsome presentation is another recurring strength, while several reviews find the film entertaining despite its stiffness. Supporting performances also receive praise, though Blunt is usually the main attraction.

The divide concerns how much drama survives the polish and reverence. Even favourable reviews note underdeveloped characters, limited spectacle or a lack of urgency; the spread runs from warm approval to firm rejection. The Guardian offers the sharpest dissent on Blunt, finding that her restraint wastes her charisma rather than serving the character. Slant Magazine rejects the romance as unconvincing and the history as lifeless, while singling out Paul Bettany’s Lord Melbourne for praise.

Variety
5 February 2009 · festival review · Derek Elley
80*

Elley finds the film polished, romantic entertainment, praising its performances and assured direction. He singles out Emily Blunt’s nuanced portrayal and her chemistry with Rupert Friend as particular strengths.

Read the full review →
Empire
25 February 2009 · Kim Newman
70*

Newman finds the film elegant, entertaining and informative, though somewhat restrained in its drama. He praises Emily Blunt’s performance and the vivid supporting turns, while noting the film skimps on spectacle.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
17 December 2009 · B- · Keith Phipps
70

Phipps finds the film an effective, if stuffy, costume drama. He praises Emily Blunt’s lively portrayal and the romantic tension she shares with Rupert Friend.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
6 February 2009 · festival review · Kirk Honeycutt
65*

The review finds the film appealing but rarely rousing, with some bloodless direction. It praises Emily Blunt and Rupert Friend’s performances, especially the romance between Victoria and Albert.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be established. No specific praise or complaint is available from the accessible text.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Susannah Straughan
60

The critic finds the biographical drama vivacious and handsome, with Emily Blunt bringing charm and steely determination to Victoria. The conflicts with Victoria’s mother and Sir John Conroy are singled out as the script’s strongest material.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Young Victoria worth watching?
The Young Victoria is worth watching for Emily Blunt and Rupert Friend’s persuasive royal courtship, and we score it 73 out of 100. We recommend it as a warm, restrained costume romance rather than a searching political drama: the family quarrels have bite, but the supporting characters and questions of power are too neatly managed.
How long is The Young Victoria, and what is it rated?
The Young Victoria runs 1h 45m and is rated PG by the MPA in the US. It is a drama and history film.
Where can I watch The Young Victoria in the US?
The Young Victoria is streaming on The Roku Channel and Amazon Prime Video in the US, and it is also available to rent from Apple TV and Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does The Young Victoria compare to The Age of Innocence?
The Young Victoria is the gentler romance, while we recommend The Age of Innocence for a more painfully persuasive account of feelings constrained by impeccable manners. Blunt and Friend make the royal courtship warm and appealing, though its politics remain tidy; Scorsese gives social rules greater dramatic weight, even if he sometimes spends too long explaining them.
What should I watch after The Young Victoria?
After The Young Victoria, try The Age of Innocence (1993, Fi1m 86): For another courtship in which impeccable manners make honest feeling difficult to express. Then The Earrings of Madame de... (1953, Fi1m 87): For romantic feeling conveyed through clothes, glances and the expensive business of keeping up appearances; and The Madness of King George (1994, Fi1m 83): A less reassuring royal household, where illness turns deference into a struggle for power.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2010

Nominated
Best Makeup and Hairstyling
Nominated
Best Production Design
Won
Best Costume Design

If you liked this, try…

  1. A Royal Affair (2012) · not on Fi1m yetA court romance with sharper political consequences and less reassurance from its royal surroundings.

  2. The Age of Innocence (1993, Fi1m 86)For another courtship in which impeccable manners make honest feeling difficult to express.

  3. Belle (2013) · not on Fi1m yetAnother period romance led by a woman confronting rules designed to keep her compliant.

  4. The Earrings of Madame de... (1953, Fi1m 87)For romantic feeling conveyed through clothes, glances and the expensive business of keeping up appearances.

  5. The Madness of King George (1994, Fi1m 83)A less reassuring royal household, where illness turns deference into a struggle for power.