Peter Maximoff (Evan Peters) holds a snack beside a cream-colored car on a wooded road
Film review

X-Men: Apocalypse

2016 · Directed by Bryan Singer · 2h 24m

In a sentenceEven Quicksilver cannot get all these introductions over with

An opening in ancient Egypt introduces Apocalypse (Oscar Isaac), a mutant who begins gathering followers. Magneto (Michael Fassbender) tries to pass as an ordinary man, seeking a life that does not revolve around his powers. Professor Charles Xavier (James McAvoy) has younger mutants around him, including Jean Grey (Sophie Turner), Cyclops (Tye Sheridan) and Nightcrawler (Kodi Smit-McPhee). As Apocalypse recruits mutants to his cause, Xavier faces an opponent building his own force from people like them. The younger mutants enter a conflict already shaped by the older generation’s disagreements.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Bryan Singer gives a likeable young cast and Michael Fassbender too little room in an overfilled superhero sequel. A few playful sequences help, but the villain and the plotting make 144 minutes feel generous.

X-Men: Apocalypse has enough appealing mutants for several films, but too little for most of them to do in this one. Bryan Singer aims for a confrontation large enough to accommodate established characters and a younger cast, and repeatedly stops to introduce somebody else. Simon Kinberg’s screenplay gives them plenty of business without much chance to become interesting together. There are pleasures here, some of them substantial, but at 144 minutes this is a disappointing way to spend time with a good ensemble.

Michael Fassbender provides the strongest reason to stay involved. As Magneto, trying to pass as an ordinary man, he makes the effort of suppressing himself feel exhausting before the film asks for any grander emotion. The smaller scenes allow him to suggest what a normal life might cost someone who can never quite relax into it. James McAvoy brings welcome warmth to Professor Charles Xavier, though the screenplay seldom lets that warmth develop into a sustained exchange between people.

The younger cast are another reason to keep watching. Tye Sheridan gives Cyclops enough awkwardness to suggest a person still getting used to himself, while Kodi Smit-McPhee makes Nightcrawler immediately companionable. Sophie Turner has less opportunity to make Jean Grey equally distinct. Simon Kinberg keeps allocating attention to the next arrival, and the result is a group we might like to know better without the scenes that would let us do so.

The ancient-Egypt opening is more inventive about spectacle. Newton Thomas Sigel’s cinematography gives it a sweep that the later effects-heavy action cannot sustain, and Grant Major’s production design makes the setting more interesting than the villain it introduces. Both help establish a sense of scale without making the images feel anonymous. Once the action grows busier, the variable effects and the shortage of clear character objectives make it harder to follow who is doing what, or why it matters.

We laughed at the Quicksilver sequence, because Evan Peters plays with the difference between his speed and everybody else’s rather than merely demonstrating it. Slow motion becomes a way to build jokes, with time to notice the next one coming and enjoy its arrival. The editors, John Ottman and Michael Louis Hill, find a precision here that the surrounding character-hopping badly needs. The sequence has a clear comic purpose, which makes it easier to follow than much of the larger action.

Oscar Isaac has a less rewarding assignment as Apocalypse, whose menace depends on how insistently the film tells us to fear him. There is little curiosity about what makes this particular villain worth opposing beyond the obvious need to stop him. John Ottman’s score supplies weight to the confrontations, but its solemnity often makes already heavy scenes feel heavier. Oscar Isaac needs more to play than a standing invitation for everybody else to look concerned.

Against the superhero genre’s better ensemble stories, this is weak at making personal differences shape the action. The cast can suggest friendships and friction, but Bryan Singer too often abandons those possibilities to manage another mass of effects. A few enjoyable sequences are not enough for us to recommend the whole film. Existing affection for these mutants will have to do quite a lot of the screenplay’s work.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

51
Positive
6
Mixed
10
Negative
10

The consensus on X-Men: Apocalypse is mixed to negative, though even several detractors find pleasures among the crowded cast and effects. Praise clusters around Quicksilver’s playful slow-motion sequence, which the reviews repeatedly identify as a welcome burst of invention. Michael Fassbender’s Magneto supplies much of the emotional weight, while the younger cast earns credit for charm. Most critics find the storytelling messy, but some consider the performances and occasional visual flair enough to keep it entertaining.

The spread is wide: reservations range from uneven pacing to a more fundamental lack of compelling drama. Overcrowding, thin character development and familiar spectacle recur across the reviews, with the villain a particular weakness for several critics. Deadline dissents on that point, praising Oscar Isaac’s Apocalypse as the chief attraction. Vulture also offers a warmer reading of the ensemble, arguing that the mutants work together rather than merely prepare the franchise’s next instalment.

Vulture
26 May 2016 · David Edelstein
75*

Edelstein likes the film, despite its choppiness and variable effects, and argues that its large ensemble works together rather than feeling like franchise setup. He especially praises the mutants’ complementary dynamics and the emotional force of Magneto’s struggle to pass as normal.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
9 May 2016 · B- · David Ehrlich
70

Ehrlich finds the film audacious and sporadically entertaining, though its heroes and character moments are underdeveloped. He singles out Magneto’s destruction of Auschwitz as a powerful, unsettling use of pop iconography.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
17 May 2016 · Jeremy Aspinall
70*

The headline presents the adventure as spectacular, though it feels like a baton handover. Its epic scale is singled out as a strength.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
23 May 2016 · B- · Ignatiy Vishnevetsky
70

Vishnevetsky finds the film interesting but frustrating and lopsided, pitting the series’ strengths against its weaknesses. He praises Singer’s power-fantasy sequences, especially Quicksilver’s time-stopping rescue, while criticizing the blockbuster structure and underdeveloped female characters.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
29 May 2016 · Richard Brody
70*

Brody finds the film dramatically weak and overlong, but says its strongest visual sequences deliver genuine cinematic ecstasy. He especially praises the inventive ancient-Egypt opening and Quicksilver’s balletic, slow-motion rescue sequence.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
26 May 2016 · Kenneth Turan
65*

Turan finds the film disorganized but engaging and diverting, though not fully convincing. He praises Quicksilver’s choreographed rescue set to “Sweet Dreams” as a standout moment.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is X-Men: Apocalypse worth watching?
X-Men: Apocalypse has enjoyable moments, but we cannot recommend the whole film; we score it 48 out of 100. Michael Fassbender and the playful Quicksilver sequence give existing fans reasons to watch, but the crowded introductions, weak villain and effects-heavy action make its 144 minutes feel longer than they should.
How long is X-Men: Apocalypse, and what is it rated?
X-Men: Apocalypse runs 2h 24m. It is a science fiction and fantasy film.
Where can I watch X-Men: Apocalypse in Colombia?
X-Men: Apocalypse is streaming on Disney+ in Colombia. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is X-Men: Apocalypse, and is it suitable for children?
X-Men: Apocalypse carries a UK 12A certificate, so we would not treat its superhero action as suitable for every child, particularly younger or sensitive viewers. The certificate requires an accompanying adult for children under 12 at the cinema; the film contains large-scale confrontations and a threatening villain, though we find his menace less persuasive than intended.
How does X-Men: Apocalypse compare to X-Men: Days of Future Past?
X-Men: Apocalypse is less satisfying than X-Men: Days of Future Past, which we find better at making its crowded cast’s disagreements matter. Both offer playful action amid solemn superhero business, but Apocalypse spends too much time introducing characters and too little developing them together. The earlier film is the stronger choice for an entertaining ensemble story.
Do you need to have seen the other X-Men films before X-Men: Apocalypse?
X-Men: Apocalypse introduces younger mutants, but we would not choose it as a starting point for the series. Its conflict grows from the older characters’ disagreements, and the film gives many of its introductions too little room to develop. Existing affection for the characters helps more than the screenplay should require.
What should I watch after X-Men: Apocalypse?
After X-Men: Apocalypse, try The Incredibles (2004, Fi1m 88): A family of superheroes whose disagreements make the action worth following. Then Akira (1988, Fi1m 83): A far harsher vision of young people frightened by their own powers; and Unbreakable (2000, Fi1m 81): Superhuman abilities become troubling discoveries, with room for the people discovering them.
What order should I watch the X-Men films in?
Release order is the safe choice for X-Men, and it is the order our collection page lists them in. X-Men: Apocalypse is the most recent of the 5 X-Men titles on Fi1m; before it comes X-Men: Days of Future Past. The full order.

Part of · 5 of 5

X-Men

5 films on Fi1m · 2000–2016 · average 65 · best X2 80

All 5 in order

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Incredibles (2004, Fi1m 88)A family of superheroes whose disagreements make the action worth following.

  2. Akira (1988, Fi1m 83)A far harsher vision of young people frightened by their own powers.

  3. The Host (2006) · not reviewed yetA monster spectacle that keeps its squabbling family firmly in view.

  4. Unbreakable (2000, Fi1m 81)Superhuman abilities become troubling discoveries, with room for the people discovering them.

  5. Chronicle (2012) · not reviewed yetTeenage powers bring awkward friendships and dangerous temptations into sharper focus.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever