Series review

A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms

2026 · Directed by Sarah Adina Smith, Owen Harris · Series · 18

In a sentenceA knight and his squire make good company; the toilet jokes have invited themselves

DramaSci-Fi & FantasyAction & Adventure

Ser Duncan ‘Dunk’ the Tall (Peter Claffey) is a knight whose story becomes tied to that of Egg (Dexter Sol Ansell), his squire. Set in Westeros before Game of Thrones, the series follows their developing friendship and the demands of living by a knight’s code when fair treatment is far from assured. Around them are other knights and Prince Maekar Targaryen (Sam Spruell). Adapted from George R.R. Martin’s fiction, the six-episode first series concentrates on the pair and their place among people with more power, status and influence.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Peter Claffey and Dexter Sol Ansell make this small-scale fantasy good company. The friendship is worth following, even when the story stretches thin and the humour turns needlessly coarse.

A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms is an enjoyable fantasy, though its small story sometimes feels stretched. Dunk and Egg give us a way into it that requires no appetite for grand political manoeuvring. The series is interested in what it takes to behave honourably when decency offers little protection, and it approaches that question with more humour than solemnity. Within a genre that can confuse complicated family histories with interesting people, this is a sensible place to start.

Peter Claffey plays Ser Duncan ‘Dunk’ the Tall with an earnestness that could easily become dull, but he makes Dunk’s wish to do right worth taking seriously. Dexter Sol Ansell’s Egg provides the livelier half of the partnership, and their exchanges have the ease that a comic pairing needs. We grew fond of them sooner than we expected, because Claffey lets Dunk’s decency survive the jokes at his expense. Their affection gives the comedy somewhere to go once the initial mismatch has been established.

Gustav Danielsson and Federico Cesca’s photography keeps the emphasis on the pair, allowing their rapport to carry scenes that have little else happening. Tom McCullagh’s production design gives their surroundings a lived-in quality, so this feels like somewhere people have to get on with ordinary life. That is a useful choice for a fantasy concerned with people who have little control over the larger world. Dan Romer’s score is most welcome as support for the lighter mood; the actors have already made the relationship worth caring about.

The writers, including Ira Parker, are less sure about how far to push the coarseness. Bodily-fluid jokes keep intruding on a relationship that is already funny without them, and their insistence becomes tiresome. We do not need Dunk made ridiculous quite so emphatically to understand that he is no grand, polished hero. The humour works better when the pair have to accommodate each other; repeated crudeness starts to feel like a substitute for finding something else for them to do.

Paulo Pandolpho’s editing allows the pairing time to work, but cannot disguise the shortage of incident. Even across a six-episode first series, there are passages that seem to be waiting for the next worthwhile exchange. The limited scale need not be a problem: a small disagreement can sustain a scene if it tells us something new about the people involved. Here the writing sometimes settles for reminding us why we already like them, and liking them does not quite fill the gap.

Directors Sarah Adina Smith and Owen Harris keep the central relationship convincing when the mood becomes darker, even if some of the early pleasure diminishes. The programme is right to test its characters’ decency, and it does not need to become a refuge from everything unpleasant to justify its warmer approach. Its modest ambitions leave room for two performances that deserve the attention. If fantasy is your sort of evening, try it for Claffey and Ansell, with a reasonable tolerance for toilet humour.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

66
Positive
4
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics welcome A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms as a warmer, smaller-scale visit to Westeros, with praise clustering around Dunk and Egg’s rapport, the lead performances and the emphasis on friendship over carnage. The humour and ordinary protagonists make the setting feel more approachable, while supporting performances also earn approval.

The spread is wide, however, running from wholehearted enthusiasm to sharp dismissal. Reservations centre on thin plotting, padding and a scope that can feel limiting rather than intimate. NME enjoys the central relationship but questions the shortage of female characters; Collider finds the adaptation too faithful and insufficiently developed, despite its supporting cast. The Independent offers the strongest dissent, finding the bodily-fluid humour gratuitous and the lowered stakes unappealing. The consensus favours the gentler approach, though the reviews differ on how much substance there is beyond the appealing central pair.

The Telegraph
19 January 2026 · ★★★★ · Ed Power
80

The review calls it an unexpectedly tender, feel-good prequel that delivers justice to the Game of Thrones universe by focusing on friendship rather than dragons or shock deaths. It singles out the sweet depiction of the unlikely bond between Dunk and Egg, along with strong supporting performances, as standout elements.

Read the full review →
The Times
19 January 2026
70*

The critic describes it as a pleasingly concise and playful reinvention of Westeros, a funny Game of Thrones prequel set after House of the Dragon.

Read the full review →
The Independent
13 January 2026
40*

The critic finds the series an odd, body-fluid-drenched spin-off that lowers the stakes and ramps up puerility, likely to baulk Game of Thrones fans. It singles out the gratuitous bodily fluids and crasser tone as points of complaint in this modest prequel based on the Dunk and Egg stories.

Read the full review →
Empire
14 January 2026 · John Nugent

The critic finds it a sweetly enjoyable bite-size alternative to the franchise, praising the odd-couple relationship between Dunk and Egg and its chivalric moral compass. Notes it is slight by design and may disappoint fans seeking sweeping canvases.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
13 January 2026 · Ben Travers

The critic praises the series for opting for a lighter, kinder tone over the usual carnage of the Game of Thrones universe. They single out the chemistry between the lead characters and the show's focus on honor and whimsy in a treacherous world.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
19 January 2026

The critic praises this heartwarming underdog tale of a simple soul and his squire as the Game of Thrones spin-off needed now, a safe space amid real-world troubles. It singles out the endearing protagonists Dunk and Egg for their charm and the series' lighter, more intimate approach compared to prior entries.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

If you liked this, try…

Detectorists poster

Detectorists

2014 · For another mismatched friendship whose small concerns deserve the attention they receive

The Princess Bride poster

The Princess Bride

1987 · For storybook adventure that takes loyalty seriously without becoming solemn about it

Seven Samurai poster

Seven Samurai

1954 · For ordinary lives made worth defending, and honour tested through practical choices

Hunt for the Wilderpeople poster

Hunt for the Wilderpeople

2016 · For another unlikely partnership, with pricklier humour and room for unexpected affection

The Green Knight poster

The Green Knight

2021 · For a stranger, more severe examination of what a knight owes others