Series review

The Beast in Me

2025 · Directed by Antonio Campos, Tyne Rafaeli, Lila Neugebauer · Series · 15

In a sentenceEight episodes is a long time to spend wondering whether to avoid the man next door

DramaMystery

Agatha ‘Aggie’ Wiggs (Claire Danes) is a reclusive author living with grief. Her new neighbour, Nile Jarvis (Matthew Rhys), arrives with a reputation that makes him difficult to ignore. A property heir suspected of murder, Nile draws Aggie into a relationship shaped by curiosity, suspicion and attempts to gain the upper hand. As she tries to understand the man next door, he becomes harder to keep at a distance. The eight-part mystery drama also features Brittany Snow as Nina Jarvis and Natalie Morales as Shelley Morris.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Claire Danes and Matthew Rhys give The Beast in Me enough tension to make its familiar setup work. But the eight-part thriller keeps them circling each other long after the writing has run short of things to say.

The Beast in Me has two actors worth watching and a mystery that struggles to justify eight episodes. Its strongest material is the awkward relationship between a grieving, reclusive author and the notorious property heir who moves next door. Claire Danes plays Agatha ‘Aggie’ Wiggs, Matthew Rhys plays Nile Jarvis, and their mutual interest gives the series a useful starting point: neither is straightforward company. We would have liked the writing to examine their fascination with each other more closely.

Danes makes Aggie’s withdrawal feel difficult rather than picturesque, which helps prevent her grief from becoming merely a convenient explanation for her behaviour. This sort of thriller can rely on a troubled central character to provide depth that the writing has not earned. Here, the performance supplies some of what the script leaves out. We were more moved by Aggie’s isolation than we expected, because Danes makes her interest in Nile feel like an effort to engage with another person again. She does not ask us to approve of the choice.

Rhys is equally important, giving Nile enough appeal for Aggie’s curiosity to remain credible. A possibly murderous neighbour is not much of a puzzle if he is plainly unbearable from the outset, and Rhys avoids that easy mistake. The exchanges between them are the reason to continue: each seems to be measuring how much the other can be persuaded to disclose. The tension depends on our uncertainty about what either person wants from the conversation.

The directors, Lila Neugebauer, Antonio Campos and Tyne Rafaeli, favour psychological unease over the brisk business of an investigation. Lyle Vincent’s cinematography helps give the encounters a horror-film unease, which suits the uncertainty about Nile. Loren Weeks’s production design contributes to the glossy finish, although that finish makes the threat feel a little too comfortably packaged. The atmosphere works while Danes and Rhys are testing one another. When their relationship stops developing, the care taken with the presentation becomes less persuasive.

The more serious problem is duration. Editors Shelby Siegel and Ralph Jean-Pierre cannot make eight episodes feel necessary when the central relationship keeps returning to the same questions. We grew impatient with the repeated contest for control, because a shift in advantage did not always bring a fresh understanding of either character. The music, credited to Sean Callery, Sara Barone and Tim Callobre, helps maintain the anxious mood. It is less successful at making these stretches feel urgent.

Writers Gabe Rotter, Howard Gordon and Daniel Pearle have material for a disquieting study of why another person’s notoriety can become so absorbing. Yet the programme is hesitant about following Aggie’s fascination towards anything especially uncomfortable. A psychological thriller needs its conversations to change our understanding of the people having them, even when it withholds the answer to the central mystery. Here, too much depends on renewing our suspicion of Nile, with too little attention to why Aggie keeps finding him compelling.

The attraction depends on how much pleasure we take in actors working through a difficult relationship. There is enough here for viewers who enjoy that process, even when the mystery stalls. Choose it for Danes and Rhys, provided a slow plot is not a deal-breaker.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

65
Positive
5
Mixed
3
Negative
3

The reviews are widely divided on The Beast in Me, with praise clustering around Claire Danes and Matthew Rhys rather than the plotting. Admirers find their manipulative relationship compelling, crediting the performances, gothic atmosphere and focused psychological exchanges with sustaining the thriller. The Times praises its tautness and sustained sense of horror. Even some less enthusiastic reviews single out one of the leads, but reservations centre on excessive length, shallow ideas and a mystery that does not generate enough tension.

The Independent values Danes’s performance while judging the series three episodes too long. The harsher dissent goes beyond complaints about pacing: The Telegraph finds neither convincing plotting nor real suspense, while Radio Times considers the cast ill-served by an overblown, silly thriller. The central disagreement is whether the performances and atmosphere make the material gripping or merely lend seriousness to an unpersuasive story.

The Times
13 November 2025 · ★★★★★
100

Claire Danes is superb as the grieving author in this poised, taut and clever psycho-thriller; the director maintains a horror vibe and the leads deliver full game.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
13 November 2025 · Lucy Mangan
90*

The critic praises the series as instant top-tier TV, highlighting the taut psychological two-hander between Claire Danes and Matthew Rhys as wonderful to watch, with awards likely ahead.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
14 November 2025 · Vicky Jessop
85*

The critic calls it one of the best shows Netflix has released this year, an immaculate psychological thriller with a killer cast and compelling cat-and-mouse dynamic.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
13 November 2025 · B+ · Saloni Gajjar
83

The Netflix thriller shines through its intense two-hander between Claire Danes and Matthew Rhys as neighbors entangled in a complex, manipulative relationship. It delivers a sharp, focused character study anchored by strong performances despite some glossy production elements.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
13 November 2025 · C+ · Ben Travers
63

The limited series about a reclusive author drawn to her notorious new neighbor is too timid in its handling of a savage story. Matthew Rhys delivers a strong performance as the possibly murderous real-estate scion, but the show lacks conviction in confronting its ideas.

Read the full review →
The Independent
17 November 2025 · Jacob Stolworthy
60*

Claire Danes elevates the series in Homeland-style form, but the psychological thriller is three episodes too long overall.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

If you liked this, try…

Swimming Pool poster

Swimming Pool

2003 · Another writer becomes absorbed in someone else’s life, with less reassuring results.

The Servant poster

The Servant

1963 · For a more concentrated struggle over who controls a supposedly civilised household.

Caché poster

Caché

2005 · Domestic unease becomes harder to dismiss when nobody can agree where guilt belongs.

Sharp Objects poster

Sharp Objects

2018 · A troubled investigator and oppressive surroundings, with sharper attention to the damage beneath.

Burning poster

Burning

2018 · Suspicion grows around an elusive man, and uncertainty becomes almost impossible to bear.