Film review

Cavalcade

1933 · Directed by Frank Lloyd · 1h 52m

In a sentenceEmpire, war and jazz, all endured with a straight back from the same drawing room

DramaWar

London, New Year’s Eve 1899. Jane Marryot (Diana Wynyard) and her husband Robert (Clive Brook) see in the new century in their drawing room with their two small sons, Edward and Joe (John Warburton and Frank Lawton, once grown), while downstairs the butler Alfred Bridges (Herbert Mundin), his wife Ellen (Una O’Connor) and the Cook (Beryl Mercer) raise their own glasses. Robert and Alfred are about to sail for South Africa and the Boer War. Jane wants her husband home and her boys kept out of uniform. The first act shows the troopship leaving the dock as the wives watch from the quay, the street crowds when news comes from Mafeking, and a household waiting for letters while the neighbour Margaret Harris (Irene Browne) keeps Jane company. The years then start to arrive in order.

Fi1m review

Frank Lloyd’s screen version of Noël Coward’s pageant is handsomely built and fatally polite. Diana Wynyard holds it together with her face; around her the film salutes the flag, weeps on cue and never asks a hard question of either.

Frank Lloyd has taken Noël Coward’s stage pageant and given it a studio’s worth of streets, docks and drawing rooms. Cavalcade follows one London family, the Marryots, and the couple who serve them, the Bridges, from New Year’s Eve 1899 to New Year’s Eve 1933, and it arranges for every public calamity of those years to pass in front of the same window. It is handsome, sincere and expensively dressed. It is also, for most of its 112 minutes, dead on its feet. That is the verdict; what follows is the reasons.

Diana Wynyard is the reason to watch. She plays Jane Marryot from young wife to grandmother’s age with little help from the make-up department and none from the script, which hands her the same speech about waiting three or four times over. She takes bad news standing up, her face going still rather than crumpling, and Lloyd is wise enough to hold on it. Clive Brook’s Robert is a decent chap with a moustache and a flag, which is all he is asked to be. Una O’Connor, as Ellen Bridges, has the only live comedy in the film and plays it with a sniff, and Herbert Mundin gives Alfred Bridges the one life the script lets go somewhere it has not already approved.

The set pieces are the studio showing what it can do. Ernest Palmer puts the camera high above a dock packed with extras as a troopship pulls out for South Africa, and the wives on the quay become a single grey mass with a few white handkerchiefs in it. Queen Victoria’s funeral is watched from a balcony, the family in black at the rail and the procession moving slowly through the street below. Margaret Clancey handles the war years as a montage, marching feet, the dates laid over them, crosses multiplying, and it is the one stretch where the film moves faster than a stage could. The four credited composers, Louis De Francesco, Arthur Lange, Peter Brunelli and John Stepan Zamecnik, lean on marches and hymns, so every public event arrives with a band. Earl Luick’s costumes take the women from bustles to dropped waists and do most of the work of telling us what year it is.

Between the set pieces the film stands still. Reginald Berkeley’s screenplay keeps the shape of Coward’s play, so a scene starts when someone comes through a door and ends when someone leaves, and people stand facing us and speak in turn. History arrives on a schedule: a date on a card, a disaster, a drawing room absorbing it. The servants are loved so long as they know their place, and when Ursula Jeans’s Fanny Bridges climbs out of it the film’s manners cool towards her. Robert makes a speech about England and what it stands for, and the film plainly agrees with every word, which is its right, but nobody in the room is allowed to answer him.

We were moved, once, and against our will. Early on, at the quay, Jane and Ellen stand side by side watching the ship, one in furs and one in a shawl, and for the length of the shot nobody is anybody’s employer. We felt it in the throat, and then we felt the film notice that we had, and reach for the band. By the middle hour we were bored, because every scene had the same shape, and then we were irritated, because so much money and care had gone into keeping it that way.

Set against what came after, it looks older than 1933. Powell and Pressburger’s The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp (1943) covers forty years of the same England and argues with itself the whole way; this film never does. Coward’s own Brief Encounter (1945) found more of the country in a station buffet than this finds in a Boer War, a royal funeral and a war to end wars. The trouble is not that Cavalcade is old. It is that it is polite about everything, including death.

See it for Wynyard, and as a record of what a Hollywood studio believed England to be, which is a subject of some interest in itself. It carries a U certificate, and the certificate is exact: there is nothing in it to alarm anyone, and that is rather the problem.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

71
Positive
5
Mixed
0
Negative
2

Most critics admire Cavalcade, and the warmest notices are the ones written on its release. The praise clusters on Frank Lloyd’s direction and on the scale of the production: the sweep of the narrative across decades, the restraint with which it is handled, and the care taken over settings and casting. Diana Wynyard is named again and again as the performance that carries the picture, with Clive Brook and Frank Lawton also singled out.

The spread is wide and it runs along the years. The two negative reviews are the recent ones. Time Out finds the film sunk by snobbery, sentimentality and jingoism, with a staginess inherited from Coward’s play. Film Stories calls it sickly and pandering, its melodrama wearing thin early, while conceding some robust performances. Even the broadly approving New Yorker notes that the plot drags and that most of the acting is ordinary. There are no mixed verdicts: critics either warm to it or do not.

Los Angeles Times
8 January 1933
90*

Cavalcade is the greatest picture Fox has ever made and many believe it to be the finest achievement of the talking film, with an unbroken sweep and flow of narrative that gains from its transfer to screen. It has universal appeal due to its humanness and enormous sympathy captured by the cast, with Frank Lloyd cheered for his intelligent, inspired guidance.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
6 January 1933 · Mordaunt Hall
90*

The Fox adaptation of Noel Coward's stage panorama is a most affecting and impressive picture, unfurled with marked good taste and restraint that leaves many eyes misty. It excels in meticulous attention to detail in settings and casting, with standout performances by Clive Brook, Diana Wynyard, and Frank Lawton.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 January 1933 · Kauf.
90*

Cavalcade is about as well made as that subject could have been made for the screen and will call forth all the adjectives critics can think up, bringing Fox and Frank Lloyd eulogies and artistic praise. It is the way the thing was put on celluloid that counts, with very good performances by almost the entire cast, especially Diana Wynyard, and unison created by the producer and director.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
5 January 2018 · THR Staff
80*

The review praises the film as a fine, splendid document of war's follies and an effective historic pageantry. It singles out Diana Wynyard's exquisite performance as the standout element carrying the picture.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
7 January 1933 · John C. Mosher
70*

Cavalcade is a highly memorable picture and extraordinarily adept bit of showmanship, spectacular often and more satisfactory than the London play on which it is based. It thrills and strikes with the anguish and triumphs of an English family across historical events, though the plot drags somewhat and most acting is ordinary except for Diana Wynyard's finesse.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · TM
30*

The critic finds the film overwhelmed by snobbery, sentimentality and jingoism in its pageant of a British family's experiences across decades of war and loss. The staginess, dictated by Noël Coward, compounds the tear-jerking contrivances.

Read the full review →

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1934

Won
Best Director
Won
Best Picture
Won
Best Production Design

If you liked this, try…