Film review

Das Boot

1981 · Directed by Wolfgang Petersen · 2h 30m · MPA R

In a sentenceThere is not enough room in this submarine to have a private panic

DramaHistoryWar

During the Second World War, a German U-boat sets out on a mission with a crew living and working in cramped quarters. The captain, known as Der Alte (Jürgen Prochnow), is responsible for men whose survival depends on the vessel and one another. Among them are Werner (Herbert Grönemeyer) and the chief engineer (Klaus Wennemann). Routine and waiting occupy much of their time, but danger can reach them without warning. Wolfgang Petersen’s adaptation of Lothar-Günther Buchheim’s novel follows the crew through the practical demands of service at sea and the strain of confinement.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Wolfgang Petersen’s submarine drama is gripping, humane and worth the strain. Jürgen Prochnow’s captain gives it weight, though several of the men around him never become much more than frightened faces in a confined space.

Das Boot is a war film we recommend warmly, provided a relaxing evening is not the requirement. Wolfgang Petersen follows a German U-boat crew through a Second World War mission and makes their confinement hard to shake off. At 150 minutes, the film gives waiting and routine enough time to become oppressive before the danger makes us miss them. It is exceptionally effective at making us care whether these men survive, even when it has given us little else to know about them.

Jürgen Prochnow’s captain is the main reason that concern holds. Prochnow makes command seem like a demanding job, requiring concentration rather than a supply of stirring speeches. We watch him because the other men need him to know what to do, and because he cannot make the boat any less vulnerable. It is a restrained performance that gives Petersen a reliable centre, keeping the fear personal when the action could easily reduce everyone to a collection of shouted orders.

Jost Vacano’s cinematography is just as important: the cramped interior remains legible, even when there seems scarcely enough space for the crew to move. The action is exciting without making the submarine feel conveniently larger whenever the camera needs access. Rolf Zehetbauer’s production design gives the men a convincing place to work, with equipment claiming space that people might reasonably want for themselves. The closeness does not wear off once we have understood the layout; Petersen keeps making us sit with it.

Hannes Nikel’s editing lets the tedious stretches register instead of treating them as an inconvenience to be hurried past. That patience pays off during the depth-charge sequences, since the men spend so much time in a place where they cannot get out of one another’s way. We were frightened by the explosions heard from inside the boat, with so little visible to tell us how much worse things might get. The sound makes us listen as intently as the crew, waiting for the next explosion.

Klaus Doldinger’s music helps sustain the tension, though it sometimes gives fear more encouragement than it needs. The film has already made the men’s helplessness clear through the sounds outside their confined quarters. Petersen’s compassion works with similar directness: we spend enough time with the crew for their distress to matter, regardless of their uniforms. His view of war is not complicated, but the physical misery gives it more force than a speech could.

The weakness is how unevenly those men are developed. Herbert Grönemeyer’s Werner and Klaus Wennemann’s chief engineer belong to a crew we believe in as a working group, but several individuals remain difficult to describe beyond their function aboard. Prochnow has enough weight to cover some of that thinness, though he cannot supply everybody else’s inner life. A war film can make a group worth caring about without giving each man an elaborate history; here, a little more distinction would have made the anxiety more personal.

Those limits do not blunt the film’s command of suspense. By the standards of a war thriller, this is patient filmmaking, willing to spend time on the dull business of endurance and trusting us to stay alert. Allow it your full attention, and choose something else if enclosed spaces already make you uneasy.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

79
Positive
4
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics praise Das Boot for making the cramped conditions aboard a German U-boat central to its tension. The reviews repeatedly single out the sound, camerawork and physical detail, with the depth-charge sequences drawing particular praise for conveying the crew’s vulnerability and the chaos of war. Several also value the film’s compassion: its attention to men working under pressure gives the action human weight, while the captain’s performance receives specific recognition.

The reservations concern the writing more than the technical execution, and the responses range from enthusiastic praise to qualified approval. Time Out admires the claustrophobic spectacle but finds the anti-war ironies trite, while Radio Times praises the action camerawork yet considers the characters beyond the captain underdeveloped. The main disagreement is therefore about how much the film achieves beyond suspense: its humanity and anti-war stance persuade most critics, but not all.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Nick de Semlyen
90*

The critic praises the film's technical brilliance and humanism, noting how the depth charge sequence powerfully conveys the senseless chaos of war through sound and claustrophobic realism. It is described as one of the greats for its execution and anti-war message.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
4 April 1997 · Roger Ebert
85*

Ebert highlights the film's intense, realistic portrayal of life aboard a cramped German U-boat during a harrowing WWII mission, praising its dispassionate depiction of the crew's experiences and the director's pure craftsmanship in building tension through sound and detail.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · David Parkinson
60

The critic finds it a tense U-boat epic based on real events, praising the camera work for action but complaining that characters besides the captain lack depth.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · GAd
60*

Praises the claustrophobic spectacle and shooting style but finds the anti-war ironies trite.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
10 February 1982 · Janet Maslin

Maslin commends the film's critical attitude toward war combined with its quiet compassion and precise, verisimilar storytelling of a U-boat crew's mission, noting the sympathetic tone and strong performances, especially the captain's.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 January 1981 · Variety Staff

The review describes the expensive production as an authentic, life-or-death account of a single U-boat mission in 1941, emphasizing its descent into hellish conditions and the realistic portrayal of the crew under the captain.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 1983

Nominated
Best Cinematography
Nominated
Best Director
Nominated
Best Film Editing
Nominated
Best Sound
Nominated
Best Sound Editing

If you liked this, try…

The Cruel Sea poster

The Cruel Sea

1953 · Another naval war film that takes exhaustion and professional responsibility seriously

Le Trou poster

Le Trou

1960 · Confined men, practical work and suspense built from the smallest sounds

Sorcerer poster

Sorcerer

1977 · Exhausted men depend on failing machinery, and the tension allows little relief

The Ascent poster

The Ascent

1977 · A harsher wartime ordeal, with the moral questions given nowhere to hide

Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World poster86

Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World

2003 · Shipboard routines and the burden of command, with more room to breathe