Film review

Gangs of Wasseypur - Part 1

2012 · Directed by Anurag Kashyap · 2h 40m

In a sentenceA mining town full of men who can organise a blood feud but not a peaceful family life

ActionThrillerCrime

In the mining town of Wasseypur, rival criminal families pursue power and carry their grievances from one generation to the next. Politics, work and family life become tangled with the business of revenge, while domestic disputes continue alongside the violence. Manoj Bajpayee plays Sardar Khan, Richa Chadha plays Nagma and Tigmanshu Dhulia plays Ramadhir Singh. Around them are Faizal Khan (Nawazuddin Siddiqui), Durga (Reema Sen) and Nasir (Piyush Mishra). Directed by Anurag Kashyap, this first part of a crime saga follows a community in which private feuds and public authority are increasingly difficult to separate.

Fi1m review

Anurag Kashyap’s fierce, funny crime saga is worth the concentration it demands. The performances and music keep its feuding families compelling, even when the crowded plotting makes it hard to keep track of them.

Gangs of Wasseypur – Part 1 is a violent, funny and demanding crime film, and we recommend it with one practical warning: keeping track of the families takes concentration. Anurag Kashyap follows revenge through a mining town where criminal ambition, political influence and domestic life are closely entangled. He gives family dealings as much attention as the gunfire, which is the right decision. The men may think their grudges deserve everyone’s attention, but the people living alongside them have their own concerns.

Manoj Bajpayee gives Sardar Khan a swagger that is funny without making him harmless. He can hold our attention through sheer insistence, which is useful in a story with so many people competing for it. Richa Chadha, as Nagma, makes the family exchanges matter; her presence stops them feeling like intervals between more important criminal appointments. Nawazuddin Siddiqui’s Faizal Khan adds to a strong ensemble, although the film’s pace leaves some of its other faces less firmly established.

Rajeev Ravi’s gliding camera movements make the action easy to follow even when the revenge plotting is not. There is pleasure in that fluency, and Kashyap is willing to make the pleasure uncomfortable. We were horrified by the casualness of the gunplay: the brisk, matter-of-fact staging makes killing look like something these people have fitted into an ordinary day. The violence is brutal, but the lack of ceremony around it is what makes it linger.

Wasiq Khan’s production design helps make Wasseypur feel like a working town rather than a place built for gunfights. That matters because Kashyap and co-writer Zeishan Quadri are interested in how crime fits into ordinary social life, including the political arrangements that allow it to continue. The family exchanges are particularly good at puncturing the men’s importance. Their earthy dialogue gives people something to do besides announce their loyalties, and lets the humour arise from their dealings with one another.

Shweta Venkat Mathew’s editing keeps the film moving across its generations, and the 160 minutes rarely feel padded. The cost is that a new name or grievance can arrive before the last has settled in our memory. A little more room around some introductions would help, particularly when several strands are competing for attention. Kashyap and Quadri occasionally hurry past people whose place in the feud needs establishing more clearly, leaving the actors to make them memorable in the time available.

Sneha Khanwalkar and G. V. Prakash Kumar’s music gives the film another source of energy, with an eclectic soundtrack that is allowed to interrupt solemnity. The songs do not require the story to stop for song-and-dance routines. Their changes of mood suit a film that keeps humour close to brutality, and the music helps the long narrative stay lively. It also supplies welcome changes of pace when the succession of feuds begins to feel relentless.

Against the gangster genre’s habit of making criminal power look enviable, Kashyap gives useful weight to the family complications and political corruption. Even its charismatic men belong to an ugly, unstable way of life, and the humour does not make that life look easier. There is enough character, music and movement here to reward the concentration, but this is not a film for half-watching. Keep the phone out of reach; there are enough names to remember already.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

83
Positive
12
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The consensus is firmly positive, with praise clustering around Anurag Kashyap’s energetic storytelling, earthy humour and handling of feuds across generations. Most critics find that the violence gains weight from the attention to family relationships, political corruption and the conditions that produce gangsters. The performances draw consistent approval, while the music, sharp dialogue and forceful action receive repeated praise. Several reviews also value the way references to Hindi cinema shape the characters’ ambitions and behaviour.

The differences concern the depth beneath that considerable energy, rather than whether the film works. The New York Times admires the camera movement and action but finds less poetry and character interest than in The Godfather. Sight and Sound finds the revenge cycles tiring in the second part, a reservation about the wider saga rather than Part 1 alone. Several critics assess both parts together; enthusiasm ranges from strong approval to much larger claims for Kashyap’s achievement.

Slant Magazine
13 January 2015 · ★★★★ · Glenn Heath Jr.
100

Kashyap’s saga is praised as a dark, funny, and electric masterpiece that portrays 20th-century Indian history through Bollywood’s reference-heavy lens, with standout praise for its outrageous set pieces, character myth-making, and the way it blurs fantasy and reality in cycles of revenge.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
19 January 2015 · Danny Bowes
95*

The critic calls it one of the most ambitious and best gangster films ever made, praising its epic scope across generations and the futility of revenge. The performances, especially by Richa Chadda and Nawazuddin Siddiqui, are highlighted as magnificent.

Read the full review →
Variety
7 June 2012 · festival review · Maggie Lee
90*

The film is hailed as a brilliant collage of genres, pulverizing and poetic in its depiction of violence, and the magnum opus of the director. Its relentless pacing and epic scope across generations and Indian history are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
24 May 2012 · festival review
85*

There is never a dull moment in this over-five-hour Indian gangland epic oozing visual style, laced with tight and often blackly comic dialogue, bolstered by strong performances and a driving neo-Bollywood soundtrack. It is a Tarantino-tinged Bihari take on The Godfather with strong crossover potential.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
21 February 2013 · Nirpal Dhaliwal
85*

The critic sees it as a possible turning point in Hindi cinema for its stylish, pacy and naturalistic portrayal of gangster life in an Indian mining town. It praises the compelling characters, sharp dialogue, fantastic soundtrack without song-and-dance routines, and raw depiction of lawlessness, political corruption and family intrigues.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
16 January 2015 · Martin Tsai
80*

The sprawling story of revenge among criminal clans is called epic in every sense, deftly managing multiple story lines over decades. Performances are uniformly excellent despite unlikable characters.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

If you liked this, try…