Alain Resnais’s puzzle about a man who insists a woman remembers him is exactly made, hard to shake and colder than it needs to be. It held us for an hour and wore on us after, and we still recommend it, with a caveat.
Alain Robbe-Grillet was a novelist before he was a screenwriter, and he wrote Last Year at Marienbad as a script in which what we see and what we are told would not agree. Alain Resnais, two years on from Hiroshima mon amour, filmed it. The result runs 95 minutes and contains one situation, played over and over. A man, X (Giorgio Albertazzi), tells a woman, A (Delphine Seyrig), that they met a year ago, that she asked him to wait a year, and that the year is up. She says it never happened. The film never tells us who is right, and it does not intend to.
What it does instead is look, and Sacha Vierny’s camera is the reason to see it. It moves at walking pace down corridors lined with mirrors and gilt, past guests standing as still as the statues, while Albertazzi’s voice describes the ceilings and the silence in a murmur that never rises. Jacques Saulnier’s production design gives every room more than it can hold: stucco, chandeliers, framed engravings of gardens. The best-known shot puts the guests in a formal garden at midday, each casting a long hard shadow, while the clipped trees around them cast none. We stopped the film and went back to check. It is not a trick of the light, it is a decision, and it tells you how to watch everything else.
Jasmine Chasney and Henri Colpi cut the film against its own narration. X describes a closed door and we see it standing open. A scene in her bedroom is shown three or four ways, the light stronger each time until the walls are almost white. Bernard Evein’s costumes join in: Seyrig is in black feathers, then white satin, then black again, and the film does not mind if she changes between one shot and the next of what is meant to be the same moment. Francis Seyrig’s score is an organ, mostly, and it plays through nearly everything like a church service that has forgotten how to end.
We should be honest about how it went for us. For the first forty minutes we were held completely; the corridors, the voice and the shadows had us leaning in. Somewhere past the hour we grew restless, then bored, then irritated at the organ. Some of that is intended. Robbe-Grillet wants you to feel a year passing in a hotel where nothing happens. We do not think all of it is intended, and a film this exact ought to know the difference.
The performances are poses more than acting, and that is the brief. Seyrig holds her hand to her mouth, turns her head, holds. It looks like a fashion plate until the moment she starts to speak at length, and then a frightened person shows through and the whole film gets warmer for a minute. Albertazzi does his work with his voice, the Italian accent making every sentence sound recited rather than remembered. Sacha Pitoëff, as M, the lean man who may be her husband, has the film’s one joke: a game with matchsticks that he plays against every guest and wins every time. “I can lose,” he says, “but I always win.” He also has the most frightening face in the building.
Resnais had made a film about memory before, and Hiroshima mon amour had people in it. This has figures. The readings it has attracted over more than sixty years, that she is dead, that he is, that this is a seduction or an assault or a ghost story, are all supported by something on screen and all contradicted by something else. We have come to think the film is not hiding an answer. It is a machine for making you argue, and it works.
See it in a cinema if one near you is showing it, because at home the temptation to pause and look something up is strong and fatal. Do not try to solve it. Nobody has in more than sixty years, and the ones who say they have are guessing.