Martin Riggs (Mel Gibson) crouches atop a moving car on a busy highway
Film review

Lethal Weapon 4

1998 · Directed by Richard Donner · 2h 07m

In a sentenceFour editors, three story writers, two tired cops and one Jet Li, who deserved better company

Detectives Martin Riggs (Mel Gibson) and Roger Murtaugh (Danny Glover) open the film in Los Angeles facing a man in body armour with a flamethrower, and Riggs stripping to his underwear to distract him. Riggs’s girlfriend Lorna Cole (Rene Russo) is pregnant; so, Murtaugh learns, is his daughter Rianne (Traci Wolfe). Nine months later, fishing on Murtaugh’s boat at night, the two collide with a freighter running Chinese immigrants into the harbour, and Murtaugh takes one family, the Hongs (Eddy Ko), into his home. The ship is connected to a Chinatown boss, Benny Chan (Kim Chan), and to Wah Sing Ku (Jet Li), who has his own reasons for wanting the cargo back. Riggs and Murtaugh are promoted to captain, saddled with an eager young detective, Lee Butters (Chris Rock), and reunited with Leo Getz (Joe Pesci), now a private investigator.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Eleven years on, Riggs and Murtaugh are promoted, expectant and plainly ready to go home, and the film feels the same way. Jet Li and one superb freeway chase keep it watchable; a plot nobody cared about keeps it from being more.

Eleven years after Lethal Weapon, Richard Donner brings back Martin Riggs (Mel Gibson) and Roger Murtaugh (Danny Glover) for a fourth time, and the tagline, “The gang’s all here”, is both the sales pitch and the diagnosis. Everyone has turned up: Rene Russo, Joe Pesci, Steve Kahan’s Captain Murphy, Darlene Love and Traci Wolfe as the Murtaugh women, with Chris Rock and Jet Li added to the table. Channing Gibson’s script, from a story by Jonathan Lemkin, Alfred Gough and Miles Millar, is about two men being told they are too old for this, and then being too old for it for 127 minutes.

The reunion itself is pleasant, and that is not nothing. Gibson and Glover have been doing this long enough that the bickering has settled into something like a marriage, Riggs needling Murtaugh about his age, Murtaugh pretending not to mind. The best scene in the film is a quiet one, on Murtaugh’s boat at night, when he decides to hide a family of Chinese immigrants rather than hand them over, and Glover plays the decision without a speech. Rock arrives as Lee Butters, a young detective who talks the way a man talks when he is frightened of being found out, and he gets more laughs per minute than anyone else because he is the only one still trying.

Jet Li, in his first Hollywood film, is the reason to sit through it. His Wah Sing Ku barely speaks and never raises his voice, and Ha Nguyen puts him in plain dark suits that make him look like an accountant until he moves. When he does, Donner for once holds the camera still. There is a moment where he takes a pistol apart in a policeman’s hand, in close-up, in about a second, and we laughed out loud the way you laugh at a card trick. It is the only time the film is frightening, and it is frightening because the violence is done by a person rather than by a special effects department.

The freeway chase is the other thing worth your time. Andrzej Bartkowiak shoots it in hard daylight with the camera low to the tarmac: Riggs dragged along the road on a sheet of plastic trailing from a lorry, a car going straight through the ground floor of an office building and out the far side. We sat forward, and we laughed, and for about six minutes the film had the cheerful disregard for physics and good sense that the first one had.

The rest is padding, and the credits tell you why. Four editors are listed, Dallas Puett, Eric Strand, Frank J. Urioste and Kevin Stitt, and the film cuts like something assembled by four people who were not shown each other’s work. Scenes start without a reason and end without a payoff. Leo Getz has a long monologue about a childhood pet frog that stops the film dead, and we checked our watch during it. The jokes have soured too. Riggs does a mock-Chinese accent at a restaurant owner. A running gag at Butters’ expense, which we will not spell out, was tired in 1998 and is worse now, and we winced each time it came round.

Lethal Weapon was about a man who wanted to die and a man who wanted to get home for dinner, and it took both wishes seriously. This one is about two men who want to retire, and it agrees with them. J. Michael Riva gives the Murtaugh house the same warm clutter it has always had, and the film keeps retreating there, to pregnancies and in-laws and dinner, as if it would rather be a sitcom. Then it remembers it is a 15 certificate and someone is shot in the head. Donner used to hold the two halves together better than anyone in the business, and here he has stopped trying.

If you liked the first three, you will get an evening’s company from this one, and you will know within ten minutes whether that is enough. If you have not seen them, start at the beginning, where the gang was smaller and had somewhere to go.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

49
Positive
1
Mixed
4
Negative
4

The reviews lean mixed to negative, with only one plainly positive notice among nine. Where there is praise, it clusters in the same two places: Jet Li’s fighting, which several critics call the best thing the fourth film adds, and the easy rapport among the returning cast, whose verbal sparring is credited even by those who dislike everything around it. The action set-pieces are generally granted professional execution, and the freeway chase comes up more than once.

The complaints are about the story and the jokes. Most critics find the plot thin or illogical, the humour tired and the running time padded, and there is a recurring sense that the series has run out of steam and its leads are going through the motions. The spread is wide. Variety is the lone enthusiast, calling it buoyant popcorn fare, while the Los Angeles Times declares it creatively bankrupt and Eye for Film says it wastes Li. Two notices are partial, so the picture is less firm than the count suggests.

Variety
8 July 1998 · Leonard Klady
75*

Klady finds the film buoyant, entertaining popcorn fare despite its illogical plot and nihilistic violence. He praises the performances, especially Chris Rock’s comic addition, and singles out the freeway chase and duel for their spectacle.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
10 July 1998
65*

The headline presents the film as an action comedy driven by its familiar stars. It singles out the mix of physical mayhem and jokes, but the blocked article leaves the critic’s overall verdict unclear.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· NF
64*

The page labels this a film review, but provides no review text. Its verdict and any specifically praised or criticized element therefore cannot be determined.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
10 July 1998 · ★★½/4 · Roger Ebert
62

Ebert finds the film entertaining but overly reliant on the series’ familiar formula. He singles out the chemistry among the returning characters as its chief strength.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · John Ferguson
60

Ferguson says the fourth film is a slight improvement over the third, though it still feels like the cast is going through the motions. He praises Jet Li’s fighting skills as the most notable new addition.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Andrew Collins
40*

The critic finds the sequel entertaining but the weakest entry in the series, with a disappointing sense that the franchise has run out of steam. The returning leads’ verbal sparring is praised, while the action is faulted for straining to feel original.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Lethal Weapon 4 worth watching?
Lethal Weapon 4 is worth watching only if you already like Riggs and Murtaugh and want an evening in their company, and we scored it 55. Jet Li and one superb freeway chase earn their place; the rest is padding cut by four editors, with a plot nobody cared about and jokes that have soured. Newcomers should start with the first film.
How long is Lethal Weapon 4, and what is it rated?
Lethal Weapon 4 runs 2h 07m. It is an action and crime film.
Where can I watch Lethal Weapon 4 in the Philippines?
Lethal Weapon 4 is available to rent from Apple TV from ₱149.00. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Lethal Weapon 4, and is it suitable for children?
Lethal Weapon 4 is a 15 certificate in the UK and rated R in the US, and it is not for children. The violence is mostly cartoonish, but someone is shot in the head, a man with a flamethrower opens the film, and Jet Li's fights are the one frightening element because they are done by a person rather than a special effects department. Older teenagers used to action films will cope.
How does Lethal Weapon 4 compare to Lethal Weapon?
Lethal Weapon 4 is the weaker film by some distance, and the original is the one we recommend. The first was about a man who wanted to die and a man who wanted to get home for dinner, and took both seriously; the fourth is about two men who want to retire, and agrees with them. Choose the sequel only for Jet Li and the freeway chase.
What should I watch after Lethal Weapon 4?
After Lethal Weapon 4, try Lethal Weapon (1987, Fi1m 80): The original, when Riggs wanting to die was a plot and not a running gag. Then Hard Boiled (1992, Fi1m 86): John Woo’s Hong Kong cop picture, where the mayhem is choreographed rather than piled up; and Midnight Run (1988, Fi1m 88): Two men who cannot stand each other on a long trip, and every joke lands.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Lethal Weapon (1987, Fi1m 80)The original, when Riggs wanting to die was a plot and not a running gag.

  2. Fist of Legend (1994) · not reviewed yetJet Li given the whole film rather than four scenes; see what Hollywood wasted.

  3. Hard Boiled (1992, Fi1m 86)John Woo’s Hong Kong cop picture, where the mayhem is choreographed rather than piled up.

  4. Midnight Run (1988, Fi1m 88)Two men who cannot stand each other on a long trip, and every joke lands.

  5. Hot Fuzz (2007, Fi1m 84)A British comedy that loves this series enough to take it apart with care.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever