A man and woman embrace on a rocky shoreline after dark
Film review

Pandora and the Flying Dutchman

1951 · Directed by Albert Lewin · 2h 04m

In a sentenceJames Mason broods, Ava Gardner speaks, and the scenery politely asks for another minute

Albert Lewin’s romantic fantasy features Pandora Reynolds (Ava Gardner), Hendrick van der Zee (James Mason) and Stephen Cameron (Nigel Patrick). The ensemble also includes Janet Fielding (Sheila Sim), Geoffrey Fielding (Harold Warrender), Juan Montalvo (Mario Cabré), Reggie Demarest (Marius Goring) and Angus (John Laurie). Albert Lewin writes and directs this 1951 film, which combines romance, drama and fantasy. Jack Cardiff provides the cinematography, John Bryan the production design and Alan Rawsthorne the music. The film runs 124 minutes and carries a PG certificate.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Ava Gardner and James Mason make Albert Lewin’s romantic fantasy worth its stretches of solemn excess. The colour and the chemistry carry it, though the scenic pauses sometimes leave the story waiting.

Pandora and the Flying Dutchman is a good romantic fantasy with a weakness for stopping to admire itself. Albert Lewin writes and directs with a seriousness that makes the extravagance persuasive, though he sometimes gives that seriousness too much time. We recommend it to anyone willing to let a romance be strange, solemn and occasionally excessive. At 124 minutes, it asks for patience, and Ava Gardner and James Mason give us a reason to supply it.

Ava Gardner’s Pandora Reynolds gives the film a welcome lightness whenever the dialogue threatens to become too grand. Her ease with a line suggests a person speaking rather than a performer carefully presenting a beautiful sentiment. We were moved more than we expected by the warmth she brings to this sombre romance. It is her relaxed delivery that does it: the feelings become easier to believe when the words sound less prepared.

James Mason’s Hendrick van der Zee can sustain the heavier emotions without making them seem merely decorative. His gravity works particularly well alongside Ava Gardner’s lighter delivery, giving the pairing enough contrast to hold our interest. Together, they make the film’s romantic intensity easier to accept. There are passages where the solemnity becomes oppressive, but he remains worth watching even when the pace makes us impatient.

Jack Cardiff’s Technicolor photography does much of the persuading too. The richness of the colour suits feelings this emphatic, and the scenery receives enough attention to become a pleasure in its own right. John Bryan’s production design supports that visual fullness, though the attraction of the surroundings can draw attention away from the performances. We can see why Albert Lewin wants to linger. We also sometimes want him to get on with the story.

The pauses are the chief weakness. Editors Clive Donner and Ralph Kemplen let scenic passages interrupt the drama, and repeated delays make the film feel longer than its running time. Alan Rawsthorne’s music adds weight to the prevailing seriousness; a little less insistence would have left the performances more room. None of this makes the romance unconvincing, but it does make its demands on our attention more noticeable than they should be.

Romantic fantasy needs some extravagance, and we would not want this one made brisk at the expense of its strangeness. The trouble comes when Albert Lewin treats lingering as sufficient proof of feeling. Ava Gardner can make an emotion register with far less fuss, which leaves the more deliberate stretches looking unnecessarily laboured. The film earns its sentimentality through its actors, then occasionally behaves as though it still has to argue the case.

A taste for romantic excess will help considerably here. Those looking for a tightly paced fantasy may find the scenic interruptions difficult to forgive, however much pleasure the colour gives them. For the more patient, the central performances are sufficient reason to stay. Choose it for an evening when a long, improbable romance sounds appealing, and allow the scenery its share of the conversation.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

69
Positive
6
Mixed
1
Negative
2

Most critics respond warmly to Pandora and the Flying Dutchman, with praise clustering around Jack Cardiff’s Technicolor cinematography and Ava Gardner’s screen presence. The photography wins approval even from reviewers who dislike the film, while admirers find its romance alluring and its blend of myth and atmosphere effective. Gardner’s magnetism is a recurring point of praise, alongside appreciation of her pairing with James Mason and the ease of her dialogue delivery.

The spread is wide, however, with reservations about lingering scenery and heavy sentimentality becoming outright objections among the dissenters. Variety finds the mood persistently sombre and depressing, and Gardner less distinctive, though it praises Mason and Cardiff. The Independent admires the visual allure but considers the story increasingly absurd. The main division is over how much the romantic mood sustains the film when the storytelling slows or strains belief.

Los Angeles Times
20 February 2020 · Edwin Schallert
90*

Schallert praises the film as a distinctive, romantically alluring creation. He singles out its scenic beauty and performances, while noting that lingering mood and scenery excursions interrupt the story.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 May 2010 · David Hughes
85*

The critic finds the film deliriously romantic and deserving of its restored re-release. They single out Ava Gardner’s magnetic performance and Jack Cardiff’s Technicolor cinematography for praise.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · The Standard
85*

The piece is strongly positive, calling the film a Technicolor masterpiece that has stood the test of time. It singles out Jack Cardiff’s superb Technicolor cinematography as a major reason for its lasting appeal.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
13 May 2010 · Andrew Pulver
85*

Pulver finds the film an extraordinary, wonderfully effective blend of myth, romance and documentary. He particularly praises Ava Gardner’s screen presence and the film’s early Technicolor cinematography.

Read the full review →
Time Out
11 May 2010 · ★★★★ · Trevor Johnston
80

The printed four-star rating indicates a positive verdict. The visible metadata highlights Lewin’s unusual background, but the review text is unavailable to identify a specific point of praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1950 · Variety Staff
30*

The review finds the film persistently somber and depressing, with Ava Gardner less distinctive. It singles out James Mason’s performance and Jack Cardiff’s color photography as the production’s standout qualities.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Pandora and the Flying Dutchman worth watching?
Pandora and the Flying Dutchman is worth watching for patient admirers of romantic fantasy, and we score it 79 out of 100. Ava Gardner and James Mason make its solemn, improbable romance convincing, while Jack Cardiff’s rich colour gives the scenery its own appeal. The frequent pauses to admire those surroundings make it a poor choice for anyone wanting a brisk story.
How long is Pandora and the Flying Dutchman, and what is it rated?
Pandora and the Flying Dutchman runs 2h 04m. It is a romance and drama film.
Where can I watch Pandora and the Flying Dutchman in Iceland?
Pandora and the Flying Dutchman is not on any streaming or rental service in Iceland at the moment. It is available in 7 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How does Pandora and the Flying Dutchman compare to A Matter of Life and Death?
Pandora and the Flying Dutchman is the more solemn choice beside A Matter of Life and Death, which we recommend more readily for its humour and moving performances. Both take impossible romances seriously, but Pandora and the Flying Dutchman requires more patience with scenic pauses and romantic excess; Gardner and Mason make that patience worthwhile.
What should I watch after Pandora and the Flying Dutchman?
After Pandora and the Flying Dutchman, try A Matter of Life and Death (1946, Fi1m 92): Another romance willing to treat impossible circumstances with complete emotional seriousness. Then Ugetsu (1953, Fi1m 89): Desire and the supernatural meet in images that make enchantment feel dangerous; and Wings of Desire (1987, Fi1m 88): A gentler supernatural romance, with room for longing and ordinary human pleasures.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. A Matter of Life and Death (1946, Fi1m 92)Another romance willing to treat impossible circumstances with complete emotional seriousness.

  2. Portrait of Jennie (1948) · not on Fi1m yetA haunted romance whose atmosphere makes its impossible love worth believing.

  3. Ugetsu (1953, Fi1m 89)Desire and the supernatural meet in images that make enchantment feel dangerous.

  4. Wings of Desire (1987, Fi1m 88)A gentler supernatural romance, with room for longing and ordinary human pleasures.

  5. The Double Life of Véronique (1991, Fi1m 86)For the colour, the unexplained connections and the confidence to leave mysteries alone.